medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 6

Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2014; 52 (6)

About breast cancer and mammography

Espinosa-Larrañaga F, Ramiro-H M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 604-605
PDF size: 29.18 Kb.


Key words:

Breast cancer, Mammography, Health public policy.

ABSTRACT

The development of health public politics is not easy and requires a long time to be established and evaluated the most of the times. There are a lot of determiners that infl uence on results. An example is the rule that is looking for identifi cation of non palpable lesions in breast through the practicing a mammography with the goal of decreasing mortality on a health problem in Mexico and worldwide: breast cancer.


REFERENCES

  1. Esserman LJ, Thompsom IM Jr, Reid B. Overdiagnosis and over treatment in cancer: An opportunity for improvement. JAMA. 2013;310(8):797-8.

  2. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1998-2005.

  3. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Janson L, Manjer J, Garne JP. Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: Follow up study. BMJ. 2006;332(7543):689-92.

  4. Martínez-Montañez OG, Uribe-Zúñiga P, Hernández- Ávila M. Políticas públicas para la detección del cáncer de mama en México. Salud Publica Mex [en línea]. 2009;51 Supl 2:s350-60.

  5. Herrera-Gómez A, Granados-García M. Manual de oncología. Procedimientos médico quirúrgicos. Quinta edición. México: McGrawHill; 2013. p. 593-604.

  6. Rodríguez-Cuevas S, Macías CG, Franceshi D, Labastida S. Breast carcinoma presents a decade earlier in Mexican women than women in the United States and European countries. Cancer. 2001;91(4):863-8.

  7. Gutiérrez JP, River-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levi T, Villalpando- Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición, 2012. Resultados nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2012.

  8. Norma ofi cial mexicana NOM-041-SSA2-2011 para la prevención, diagnóstico, tratamiento, control y vigilancia epidemiológica del cáncer de mama. Diario Ofi cial de la Federación del 9 de junio de 2011.

  9. American Cancer Society. [Sitio web]. Press Releases. American Cancer Society responds to changes to USPSTF mammography guidelines. Disponible en http:// pressroom.cancer.org/index.php?s=43&item=201.2009

  10. National Cancer Institute. [Sitio web]. Fact Sheets. Mammograms. Disponible en http://www.cancer.gov/ cancertopics/factsheet/detection/mammograms

  11. Pace LE, Keating NL. A systematic assessment of benefi ts and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1327-35.

  12. Hernández-Valencia M, Hernández-Quijano T, Zárate A, Saucedo R. Utilidad y riesgos de la mamografía rutinaria para detectar cáncer de mama. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2014;52(6):704-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2014;52