2015, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2015; 53 (1)
Bioethics in clinical practice
Sánchez-Gonzaléz M, Herreros B
Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 66-73
PDF size: 56.16 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Bioethics has grown exponentially in recent decades. Its most important
schools include principlism, casuistry, virtue ethics and the ethics
of care. These schools are not exclusive. Within bioethics, clinical ethics
addresses the inherent clinical practice ethical problems, problems
which are many and very varied. Bioethics training is essential for clinicians
to address these bioethics’ problems. But even the professionals
are trained, there are problems that cannot be solved individually
and require advisory groups in clinical ethics: clinical ethics committees.
These committees are also responsible for education in bioethics in
health institutions. Clinical bioethics is a practical discipline, oriented to
address specifi c problems, so its development is necessary to improve
the decision making in such complex problems, inevitable problems in
healthcare.
REFERENCES
Simón-Lorda P, Barrio Cantalejo IM. Un marco histórico para una nueva disciplina: la bioética. Med Clin (Barc). 1995;105(15):583-97.
Sánchez González MA. Ética, bioética y globalidad. Madrid: Editorial CEP, 2007.
Jonsen, A. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
Potter VR. Bioethics: The science of survival. Perspect Biol Med. 1970;14(1):127-53.
Potter VR. Bioethics, bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs: New York, Prentice Hall, 1971.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University, 1979.
Potter VR. Bioethics. Bridge to the Future. Prentice hall; 1971.
Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Reich W (editor). New York: MacMillan; 1978.
Potter VR. Global Bioethics. Michigan: Michigan State University Press; 1988.
Jonsen AR. American moralism and the origin of bioethics in the United States. J Med Philos. 1991;16(1):113-30.
Clouser KD, Gert B. A critique of principlism. J Med Philos. 1990;15(2):219-36.
Jonsen AR, Toulmin S. The abuse of casuistry: a history of moral reasoning. Berkeley; Los Ángeles: University of California, 1988.
Jonsen A, Siegler M, Winslade W. Clinical ethics. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. For the patient’s good: the restoration of benefi cence in health care. New York: Oxford University, 1988.
Drane JF. Becoming a good doctor: The place of virtue and character in medical ethics. Kansas: Sheed & Ward, 1988.
Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women´s development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 1982.
Simón Lorda P, Júdez J J. Consentimiento informado. Med Clin (Barc). 2001;117(3):99-106.
Herreros B, García Casasola G, Pintor E, Sánchez MA. Paciente confl ictivo en urgencias: defi nición, tipología y aspectos éticos. Rev Clin Esp. 2010 Sep;210(8):404-9.
López-Soriano F, Bernal L, Pozo P. Mapa de confl ictos éticos intrahospitalarios. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2007;22(1):50-5
Ross JW, Glaser JW, Rasinski-Gregory D, Mc- Iver Gibson JM, Bayley C. Health Care Ethics Committees: the next generation. H E C Forum. 1994;6(3):157-62.
Abel F. Comités de ética asistencial. An Sist Sanit Navarra. 2006; 29 Suppl 3:75-83.
Blagg CR. The early years of chronic dialysis: The Seattle contribution. Am J Nephrol, 1999;19(2):350-4.
Stevens ML. The Quinlan case revisited: a history of the cultural politics of medicine and the law. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21(2):347-66
Singer PA, Pellegrino ED, Siegler M. Ethics committees and consultants. J Clin Ethics.1990;1(4):263-7.
Herreros B, Ramnath VR, Bishop L, Pintor E, Martín MD, Sánchez-González MA. Clinical ethics protocols in the clinical ethics committees of Madrid. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(3):205-8.
Ribas Ribas S. Competencias de los comités de ética asistencial y autoevaluación de sus componentes. Estudio CEA-CAT (2). Med Clin (Barc). 2007;128(6):219-25.
Pedersen R, Akre V, Fřrde R. What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(3):147-52.
Full text