medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica

Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2011; 9 (3)

Clinico-etiological correlation and factors associated with onychomycosis

Ríos YJM, Ríos CM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 221-227
PDF size: 131.16 Kb.


Key words:

Onychomycosis, dermatophytes, yeasts, molds.

ABSTRACT

Background: Onychomycosis (OMC) is an important public health problem, it can predispose to other infections and also cause systemic infections in immunocompromised hosts. It is also a cosmetic problem with physical, psychosocial and occupational limitations. There is little information about the ethiologic agents of onychomycosis in Panama and its clinical correlation.
Objective: To determine the clinical and ethiological correlation associated factors with the development of onychomycosis in hospitalized patients at the Complejo Hospitalario Dr. Arnulfo Arias Madrid during 2009.
Material and method: Descriptive, prospective, longitudinal, randomized and open study with a representative sample of 203 hospitalized patients. A detailed clinical history of each patient was written and nail samples were taken for direct mycological exam and culture.
Results: 203 patients with clinical characteristics of OMC were studied. 75.37% of the patients had distal and lateral subungueal OMC, and 78.82% wore closed shoes made with synthetic materials. 42.11% of the direct mycological exams, and 53.20% of the cultures were positive. Yeasts were isolated in 41.67%, dermatophytes in 39.81%, and non dermatophytes molds in 18.52%. Trichophyton rubrum was the most common isolated agent (31.48%).
Conclusion: The direct mycological exam and the culture confirm the diagnosis of OMC, but we assumed there may be some false negative results. Yeasts, dermatophytes and molds were isolated from the patients with OMC of our hospital. Trichophyton rubrum was the most frequent agent.


REFERENCES

  1. Brito A, Marcano C, Lemus D, Ruiz A, Borelli K. “Dermatofitos causantes de tiña en las uñas de los pies en población menor de 20 años”. Rev Soc Ven Microbiol 2001; 21.

  2. Gupta M, Sharma NL, Kenga AK, Mahajan VK, Tegta GR. “Onychomycosis: clinico-mycologic study of 130 patients from Himachal Pradesh, India”. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007; 73: 389-392.

  3. Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. “Onychomycosis – Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Management”. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008; 26: 108-116.

  4. Fuentes-Rivera D. “Epidemiología y diagnóstico clínico-etiológico de onicomicosis en un centro universitario (junio 97-mayo 99)”. Dermatología Peruana 2000; 10: 21-33.

  5. Surjushe A, Kamath R, Oberai C, Saple D, Thakre M, Dharmshale S, et al. “A clinical and mycological study of onychomycosis in HIV infection”. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007; 397-401.

  6. Awad P, Cristina SM, Cabrera SH. “Onicomicosis por dermatofitos en pacientes diabéticos en la Asociación de diabéticos de Chile”. Rev Chilena Dermatol 2006; 22(2): 97-100.

  7. Weightman W, Phillips P. “Diabetes and the skin – onychomycosis”. Aust Fam Physician 2006; 35: 499.

  8. Kuvandik G, Çetin M, Genctoy G, Horoz M, Duru M, Akcali C, et al. “The prevalence, epidemiology and risk factors for onychomycosis in hemodialysis patients”. BMC Infect Dis 2007; 7: 102.

  9. Escobar M, Carmona-Fonseca J. “Onicomicosis por hongos ambientales no dermatofíticos”. Ver Iberoam Micol 2003; 20: 6-10.

  10. Balleste R, Mousqués N, Gezuele E. “Onicomicosis. Revisión del tema”. Ver Med Uruguay 2003; 19: 93-106.

  11. Córdoba S. “Onicomicosis: diagnóstico y manejo terapéutico”. Nuevadermis Revista 2006; 4: 8-15.

  12. Piraccini BM, Tosti A. “White superficial onychomycosis: epidemiological, clinical and pathological study of 79 patients”. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140: 696-701.

  13. Valdivia L. “La Dermatofitosis: clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento”. Dermatol Peru 2003; 13: 7-12.

  14. Luque A, Ramos L, Amigot S, Riccomi A. “Estudio micológico de 100 casos de lesiones ungueales de la ciudad de Rosario – República Argentina”. Rev Iberoam Micol 1997; 14: 164-167.

  15. Martins EA, Guerrer LV, Cunha KC, Soares MM, de Almeida MT. “Onychomycosis: clinical, epidemiological and mycological study in the municipality of São José do Rio Preto”. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2007; 40: 596-598.

  16. Manzano Gayosso P, Méndez Tovar L J, Arenas R, Hernández Hernández F, Millán Chiu B, Torres Rodríguez JM, et al. “Levaduras causantes de onicomicosis en cuatro centros dermatológicos mexicanos y su sensibilidad antifúngica a compuestos azólicos”. Rev Iberoam Micol 2011; 28: 32-35.

  17. López Jodra O, Torres Rodríguez J. “Especies fúngicas poco comunes responsables de onicomicosis”. Rev Iberoam Micol 1999; 16: S11-S15.

  18. Escobar ML, Carmona Fonseca J, Santamaría L. “Onicomicosis por Malassezia”. Rev Iberoam Micol 1999; 16: 225-229.

  19. Arenas R, Isa-Isa R. “Onicomicosis por Malassezia SP ¿Portadores o verdaderas onicomicosis?” Dermatologia Venezolana 2001; 39: 24-26.

  20. Bonifaz A, Cruz Aguilar P, Ponce RM. “Onychomycosis by molds. Report of 78 cases”. Eur J Dermatol 2007; 17: 70-72.

  21. Velez H. “Onicomicosis por hongos saprófitos. Informe de 49 casos”. IATREIA 1988; 1: 91-97.

  22. Ungpakorn R. “Mycoses in Thailand: Current concerns”. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2005; 46: 81-86.

  23. Barrera Vigo MV, Tejera Vaquerizo A, Mendiola Fernández M, Cid J, Cabra de Luna B, Herrera Ceballos E. “La biopsia ungueal: un método diagnóstico de gran utilidad. Estudio de 15 casos”. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2008; 99: 621-627.

  24. Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Saunte DM, Arendrup MC. “Five-Hour diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections with specific detection of Trichophyton rubrum”. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 1200-1204.

  25. Savin C, Huck S, Rolland C, Benderdouche M, Faure O, Noacco G, et al. “Multicenter evaluation of a commercial PCR-Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay diagnostic kit (Onychodiag) for diagnosis of dermatophytic onychomycosis”. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 1205-1210.

  26. Garg J, Tilak R, Singh S, Gulati AK, Garg A, Prakash P, et al. “Evaluation of pan-dermatophyte nested PCR in diagnosis of onychomycosis”. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 3443-3445.

  27. Weinberg JM, Koestenblatt EK, Tutrone WD, Tishler HR, Najarian L. “Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis”. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 193-197.

  28. Shenoy MM, Teerthanath S, Karnaker VK, Girisha BS, Krishna Prasad MS, Pinto J. “Comparision of potassium hydroxide mount and mycological culture with histopathologic examination using periodic acid- Schiff staining of the nail clippings in the diagnosis of onychomycosis”. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008; 74: 226-229.

  29. Rich P, Harkless L, Atillasoy E. “Dermatophyte test medium culture for evaluating toenail infections in patients with diabetes”. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1480-1484.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica. 2011;9