medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica

Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2006; 4 (2)

Use of botulinic toxin in pre-operative of chin’s allograft implant

Blugerman G, Schavelzon D, Pontón A, Chomyszyn A, Bonesana G, Martínez L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 95-98
PDF size: 291.06 Kb.


Key words:

Chin, AEsthetical aspect of the chin, Allografts, Type a boutolinic toxin.

ABSTRACT

The position and shape of the chin are important in the harmony and in the beauty of the face. The chin interferes also with the position and function of the lips. In this area several muscles are inserted and they play a key role in the mouth occlusion and in the aesthetical aspect of the chin.
Through the years, different procedures have been used with the aim to increase bony projection of the chin. The most popular one is done using allografts. But these grafts must resist the strong force of the muscles, as from these conflicts, adverse effects and complications of different degrees can occur. To attenuate these undesirable effects, we have use with success the pre-operative Type A botulinic toxin (Botox, of Allergan, and Dysport, of Ipsen Inamed).


REFERENCES

  1. Aufricht G. Combined plastic surgery of the nose and chin. Am J Surg 1958; 95: 231-236

  2. Cohen SR, Mardach OL, Kawamoto HK Jr. Chin disfigurement following removal of alloplastic chin implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (1): 62-66; discussion, 67-70

  3. Costantino PD, Friedman CD. Soft-tissue augmentation and replacement in the head and neck. General considerations. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994; 27 (1): 1-12

  4. Costantino PD. Synthetic biomaterials for soft-tissue augmentation and replacement in the head and neck. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994; 27 (1): 223-262

  5. Garner WL. Gore-Tex facial implants. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (7): 1899-1900

  6. Gibson FB, Calhoun KH. Chin position in profile analysis. Comparison of techniques and introduction of the lower facial triangle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118 (3): 273-276

  7. González-Ulloa M, Stevens E. The role of chin correction in profileplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 41 (5): 477-486

  8. González-Ulloa M. Quantitative principles in cosmetic surgery of the face (profiloplasty). Plast Reconstr Surg 1962; 29: 186-198

  9. Gross EJ, Hamilton MM, Ackermann K, Perkins SW. Mersilene mesh chin augmentation. A 14-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (3): 183-189; discussion, 190

  10. Li KK, Cheney ML. The use of sliding genioplasty for treatment of failed chin implants. Laryngoscope 1996; 106 (3 Pt 1): 363-366

  11. Maas CS, Merwin GE, Wilson J et al. Comparison of biomaterials for facial bone augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116 (5): 551-556

  12. Mahler D. Chin augmentation —A restrospective study. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 8 (6): 468-473

  13. Matarasso A, Elias AC, Elias RL. Labial incompetence: a marker for progressive bone resorption in silastic chin augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (6): 1007-1014; discussion, 1015

  14. McCarthy JG. Microgenia: a logical surgical approach. Clin Plast Surg 1981; 8 (2): 269-278

  15. McCarthy JG, Ruff GL. The chin. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15 (1): 125-137

  16. McCarthy JG, Ruff GL, Zide BM. A surgical system for the correction of bony chin deformity. Clin Plast Surg 1991; 18 (1): 139-152

  17. Moenning JE, Wolford LM. Chin augmentation with various alloplastic materials: a comparative study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1989; 4 (3): 175-187

  18. Pitanguy I, Martello L, Caldeira AM, Alexandrino A. Augmentation mentoplasty: A critical analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1986; 10 (3): 161-169

  19. Pitanguy I. Augmentation mentoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42 (5): 460-464

  20. Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982; 81 (5): 351-370

  21. Rosen HM. Aesthetic guidelines in genioplasty: The role of facial disproportion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (3): 463-469; discussion, 470-472

  22. Sclafani AP, Thomas JR, Cox AJ, Cooper MH. Clinical and histologic response of subcutaneous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor) implants to acute and early infection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (3): 328-336

  23. Strauss RA, Abubaker AO. Genioplasty: A case for advancement osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (7): 783-787

  24. Zide BM, Pfeiffer TM, Longaker MT. Chin surgery: I. Augmentation — The allures and the alerts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (6): 1843-1853; discussion, 1861-1862.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica. 2006;4