medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Odontológica Mexicana Órgano Oficial de la Facultad de Odontología UNAM

ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2015; 19 (2)

Focal multiepithelial hyperplasia: comparative treatment, glycyrrhizinic acid versus liquid nitrogen

Cáceres SO, Fragoso RR, Mena CC, Álvarez RA, Pavón RN, Vació MC, Cuairán RV
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 101-105
PDF size: 389.33 Kb.


Key words:

Focal multiepithelial hyperplasia, glycyrrhizinic acid, liquid nitrogen.

ABSTRACT

In pediatric population, focal multiepithelial hyperplasia (FMH) is characterized by the onset of multiple lesions in the mucosa of the mouth; it is associated to the human papillomavirus. Presently, no special treatment is preferred, the most widely used is liquid nitrogen (LN) treatment, nevertheless, this is an uncomfortable and painful treatment for the patient. This would prompt us to look for new, less invasive treatment alternatives such as use of glycyrrhizinic acid (GA). Aim: To compare GA efficiency versus LN in FMH in Mexico Children’s Hospital patients (HIM) aged 5 to 13 years. To determine clinical epidemiological characteristics as well as adverse effects. Material and methods: The present was a randomized controlled clinical trial. It was divided into two groups: group A was treated with GA applications, four times a day, two atomizer shots, for one month. Group B was treated with LN once a month for three months. Results: 20 pediatric-age patients were studied, out of which 11 were male and 9 female. 12 patients had relatives afflicted with the disease. Most frequent topography was the lower lip. Efficiency of group treated with GA was 63% when compared to group treated with LN which exhibited 81% efficiency. Systemic diverse effects were only observed with use of LN. 0.075 p was obtained (7.5%). Conclusions: GA efficiency was ascertained although it was lesser than that of LN. GA can be used as an adjuvant treatment in order to decrease lesions, it elicits minimal local adverse effects.


REFERENCES

  1. Ficarra G, Adler S, Galleoti F, Shillitoe E. Focal epithelial hyperplasia (Heck’s disease): the first reported case from Italy. Tumori. 1991; 77: 83-85.

  2. Simón RS, Martín M, Tejerina-González E, Salinas S, Patrón-Romero M. Hiperplasia epitelial focal. Una lesión infrecuente en nuestro medio. Abstract Congreso Soc Esp Anat Patol. 2001.

  3. Bassioukas K. Oral focal epithelial hyperplasia. Eur J Dermatol. 2000; 10: 395-397.

  4. Guevara A, Blondet J, Llerena V. Prevalencia y distribución de la hiperplasia epitelial focal en la población escolar de Morrote-Lambayake-Perú. Folia dermatol. 2003; 14: 15-20.

  5. Zeuss M, Miller CS, White DK. In situ hybridization analysis of human papillomavirus DNA in oral mucosal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 71: 714-720.

  6. Martin-Crevillente O. Report on the results of the tests with the product Epigen (Laboratories Cheminova International, S.A., Madrid). Evaluate the effectiveness and the tolerance of the antiviral preparation Epigen in women with papilloma virus infection. Madrid: Ginecologic Center “Salud y Mujer”; 1998.

  7. de Villiers EM, Neumann C, Le JY, Weidauer H, zur Hausen H. Infection of the oral mucosa with defined types of human papillomaviruses. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1986; 174: 287-284.

  8. Carlos R, Sedano H. Multifocal papilloma virus epithelial hyperplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994; 77: 631-635.

  9. Freedberg I, Eisen A, Wolf K. Pathology of disorder affecting the oral mucosa. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine. 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999 (1): pp. 1306-1312.

  10. Lazarova AZ, Pérez AH, Díaz G. Hiperplasia focal del epitelio oral. Primer caso descrito en Cuba. Med Cutan Iberolatinoam. 1988; 16: 18-20.

  11. Mahe A, Blachereau P, Gaulier A, Aouichi G, sigal S. Etude histologique ultrastructurale et virologuique d’un cas d’hyperplasie épithéliale focale ou maladie de Heck. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1989; 116: 840-842.

  12. Orfanos CE, Strunk V, Gartmann H. Focal epithelial hyperplasia of the oral mucosa: Heck’s disease. Dermatológica. 1974; 149: 163-175.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Odont Mex. 2015;19