Pérez-López S, Ortiz-Zaragoza MC, Landgrave-Ibáñez S, González-Pedraza A

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 39-42
PDF size: 250.61 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to compare parental educational styles of families with pregnant and non-pregnant teenage daughters. Methods: observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and comparative study. It included pregnant and non-pregnant adolescents, between 15 and 19 years old, from the ti Bekal Health Care Center of the Health Services in Mexico City. It was made an identification card, as well as a scale to evaluate the parental educational of adolescents. Using inferential statistics with the t test of Student from independent samples, 0.05 significance level and the statistical program spss v. 18. Results: the study included 16 pregnant teenagers and 28 non-pregnant; whose age averaged 17.88 ±1. 45 years and 16.68 ±1.12 years old, respectively, in the dimensions of the scale, pregnant women showed best results in affection and communication, humor and psychological control, in this last dimension it was showed statistically significant differences in pregnant teenagers (p=0.010); on the other hand, the non-pregnant women obtained best averages in control behavior with significant differences (p=0.036) in autonomy and revelation. Conclusions: there was no predominance of better results between the two study groups in the different dimensions of the scale, however, in the control behavioral dimension, which defines the permissive style of parents; pregnant adolescents scored much lower with difference statistically significant in favor of a relaxed or permissive education.

REFERENCES

1. Banco Mundial. Madres adolescentes (% de las mujeres entre 15 y 19 años que tuvieron hijos o se encuentran embarazadas en la actualidad). [Internet] [citado 2014 Nov 15]. Disponible en: http://datos. bancomundial.org/indicador/SP.MTR.1519.ZS

2. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición, Ensanut 2012. [Internet] [citado 2014 Nov 30] Disponible en: http://ensanut.insp.mx/informes/ensanut2012ResultadosNacionales. pdf

3. inegi. Censo de población y vivienda 2010. [Internet] [citado 2014 Noviembre 29]. Disponible en: http:// www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/olap/proyectos/bd/ consulta.asp?p=17118&c=27769&s=est

4. Marín FL, Villafañe GA, Gurza A. La relación familiar como un factor que predice el embarazo adolescente. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala. 2006;9(3):24-42.

5. Oliva DA, Jiménez JM, Parra JÁ, Sánchez-Queija I. Acontecimientos vitales estresantes, resiliencia y ajuste adolescente. Revista de Psicopatología y psicología Clínica. 2008;13(1):53-62.

6. Baumrind D. Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence. 1968;(3):255-72.

7. Steinberg L, Silk JS. Parenting adolescents. En: Bornstein I, editor. Handbook of parenting. Vol. 1. Children and Parenting. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. p. 103-34.

8. Méndez Sánchez M, Andrade Palos P, Peñaloza Gómez R. Prácticas parentales y capacidades y dificultades en preadolescentes. Revista Intercontinental de Psicología y Educación [Internet] 2013: [citado 2014 Dic 11] 15(1);99-118. Disponible en: http:// www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80225697007

9. Fletcher AC, Steinberg L, Williams-Wheeler M. Parental Influences on Adolescent Problem Behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development. 2004;75(3):781-96.

10. Oliva DA, Parra JÁ, Sánchez-Queija I, López GF. Estilos educativos materno y paterno: evaluación y relación con el ajuste adolescente. Anales de Psicología. 2007;23(1):49-56.

11. Oliva DA, Antolín SL, Pertegal VM, Ríos BM, Parra JA, Hernando GA, et al. Instrumentos para la evaluación de la Salud Mental y el desarrollo positivo adolescente y los activos que lo promueven. Andalucía, España: Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de salud diseño y maquetación. Obemedia S.C.; 2011.