medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2003; 17 (4)

Measurement of the bone mineral content in lumbar vertebrae L2-L4 of female Long Evans rats by means of dual energy X-ray and chemical analysis

Quintana-Armenta A, Ruiz-Rosano L, Valdez-Mijares R, Diez-García MP et al
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 168-172
PDF size: 92.47 Kb.


Key words:

rats Long-Evans, lumbar vertebrae, analytical chemistry, X-ray absorptiometry, dual-energy.

ABSTRACT

A non-invasive method for determining bone mass of rats is by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Using a Hologic QDR-2000 densitometer programmed and calibrated for the study of rat L2-L4 lumbar vertebrae, we assessed the precision and accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) measurements of a group of 14 female Long Evans rats of 22 weeks of age and 290-320 g of body weight. Under anesthesia, three consecutive determinations with repositioning were made per rat. BMD and BMC were (mean ± SD): 175.20 ± 2.00 mg/cm2 and 450.60 ± 18.00 mg, respectively, with group intra-assay coefficients of variation of 1.15 ± 0.20% and 4.12± 1.95% (mean ± SD), respectively, showing good precision. The spectrophotometric analysis of the content of calcium, magnesium, and phosphorous in the product of HNO3 digestion of the L2-L4 vertebrae of the same rats were (in mg, mean ± SD): 131.21 ± 6.93, 2.22 ± 0.17 and 55.77 ± 3.45, respectively, with linear correlation coefficients (r) vs their BMC of 0.52, 0.33 and 0.47 (p > 0.05) (measure of accuracy), which suggest that BMC measurements are approximate, and do not substitute for chemical analyses.


REFERENCES

  1. Ammann P, Rizzoli R, Slosman D, Bonjour JP: Sequential and precise in vivo measurement of bone density in rats dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7: 311-316.

  2. Cazez JP, Muehlbauer RC, Lippuner K, Kelly T, Fleisch H, Jaeger P: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring total bone mineral content in the rat: Study of accuracy and precision. Bone Miner 1994; 26(1): 61-68.

  3. Fiske CH, Subbarow Y: The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 1925; 66: 375.

  4. Gala Paniagua J, Díaz-Curiel M, de la Piedra Gordo C, Castilla Reparaz C, Torralbo García M: Bone mass assessment in rats by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 1998; 71(847): 754-8.

  5. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK: Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5(4): 262-270.

  6. Grier SJ, Turner AS, Alvis Mr: The use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in animals. Invest Radiol 1996; 31(1): 50-62.

  7. Griffin MG, Kimble R, Hopfer W, Pacifici R: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the rat: Accuracy, precision and measurement of bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8(7): 795-800.

  8. Kastl S, Sommer T, Klein P, Hohenberger W, Engelke K: Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bone 2002; 30(1): 243-246.

  9. Rozenberg S, Vandromme J, Neve J, Aguilera A, Muregancuro A, Peretz A, Kinthaert J, Ham H: Precision and accuracy of in vivo bone mineral measurement in rats using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 1995; 5(1): 47-53.

  10. Yamauchi H, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Inoue T: Assessment of spine bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats using DXA. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10(7): 1033-1039.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2003 Jul-Ago;17