medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Cirugía

ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2014; 53 (3)

Usefulness of Rockall clinical score in upper non variceal gastrointestinal bleeding

Infante VM, Guisado RY, Rodríguez ÁD, Ramos CJY, Angulo PO, Domínguez OR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 235-243
PDF size: 205.62 Kb.


Key words:

non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Rockall clinical score, endoscopy, ROC curves.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the clinical Rockall score serves to stratify the individuals with non variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage depending on the risk of presenting active bleeding and therefore, they urgently need digestive endoscopy.
Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of the Rockwall clinical score in identifying patients who need therapeutic endoscopy.
Methods: a prospective study with calculation of the Rockall clinical score according to a homonymous scale. Performance of urgent endoscopy and of therapeutic hemostatic endoscopy in patients with active or recent bleeding. Determination of efficacy through the analysis of ROC curves, Youden´s index and calculation of sensibility and specificity of the best cutoff point.
Results: one hundred and eighteen patients were included, 22 of whom (18.6 %) received therapeutic endoscopy to manage active or recent bleeding. Rocwall clinical score reached a mean of 1.79 points. It was found that 83 (70.3 %) were high and 35 (29.7 %) low risk patients. The predictive capacity was excellent, being the ABC= 0.960 (95 % CI: 0,904-1,017). The cutoff point was 1 (J= 0.971) with 97 % sensibility and 71 % specificity.
Conclusions: the Rockall clinical score can be safely used to make a decision on the urgent performance of endoscopy in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.


REFERENCES

  1. Farooq FT, Lee MH, Das A, Dixit R, Wong RC. Clinical triage decision vs risk scores in predicting the need for endotherapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;30(1):129-34.

  2. Gralnek IM, Dulai GS. Incremental value of upper endoscopy fortriage of patients with acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):9-14.

  3. Colle I, Wilmer A, Le Moine O, Debruyne R, Delwaide J, Dhondt E, et al. Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding management: Belgian guidelines for adults and children. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2011 Mar;74(1):45-66.

  4. Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulce rbleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):345-61.

  5. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):101-13.

  6. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK. Consensus recommendations fo rmanaging patients with non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann InternMed. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):843-57.

  7. Sung JJ, Chan FK, Chen M, Ching JY, Ho KY, Kachintorn U, et al. Asia-Pacific Working Group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1170-7.

  8. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21.

  9. Forrest JA, Finlayson ND, Shearman DJ. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet. 1974 Aug 17;2(7877):394-7.

  10. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J. Howearlyshouldendoscopy be performed in suspectedupper gastrointestinal bleeding? Am J Gastroenterol [serial onthe Internet]. 2012 [Citado noviembre 2014];107(2). Available from: http://www.nature.com/ajg/journal/v107/n2/full/ajg2011363a.html

  11. Chandra S, Hess EP, Agarwal D, Nestler DM, Montori VM, Song LM, et al. External validation of the Glasgow-BlatchfordBleeding Score and theRockall Score in the US setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.03.010.

  12. Trawick EP, Yachimski PS. Management of non-varicealupper gastrointestinal tracthemorrhage: controversies and areas of uncertainty. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 21;18(11):1159-65.

  13. Fonseca J, Alves CC, Neto R, Arroja B, Vidal R, Macedo G, et al. Non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Portugal: A multicentric retrospective study in twelve Portugues e hospitals. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jun;35(6):377-85.

  14. Jerraya H, Bousslema A, Frikha F, Dziri C. Is there a place for the Glasgow-Blatch ford score in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding?. Tunis Med. 2011 Dec;89(12):916-9.

  15. De la Fuente SG, Khuri SF, Schifftner T, Henderson WG, Mantyh CR, Pappas TN. Comparative analysis of vagotomy and drainage versus vagotomy and resection procedures for bleeding peptic ulcer disease: results of 907 patients from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):78-86.

  16. Espinoza Rios J, Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J, Lindo Ricce M, Garcia Encinas C, Rios Matteucci S, Vila Gutierrez S, et al. Prospective validation of the Rock all Scoring System in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Cayetano Heredia Hospital Lima-Peru. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2009 Apr-Jun;29(2):111-7.

  17. Trawick E, Yachimski P. Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tracthemorrhage: Controversies and areas of uncertainty. World J Gastroenterol [serial onthe Internet]. 2012 [Citado noviembre 2014];18(11). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309904/?tool=pubmed

  18. Holster IL, Kuipers EJ. Update on the endoscopic management of peptic ulcer bleeding. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Dec;13(6):525-31.

  19. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, Mowat C, Gaya DR, Thompson E, et al. Out patient management of patients with low-riskupper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):42-7.

  20. Meltzer AC, Burnett S, Pinchbeck C, Brown AL, Choudhri T, Yadav K, et al. Preendoscopic Rockall and Blatchford scores to identify which emergency department patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleed do not need endoscopic hemostasis. J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):1083-7.

  21. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, et al. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical out comes and intervention in hospitalized patients withupper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):576-83.

  22. Ahn S, Lim KS, Lee YS, Lee JL. Blatch ford score is a use ful tool forpredicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Aug;28(8):1288-94.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2014;53