medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Hospital Juárez de México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

Next >>

Rev Hosp Jua Mex 2015; 82 (2)

Esofagitis eosinofílica en pacientes con disfagia e impactación alimentaria sin alteración endoscópica

Uriegas-de-las-Fuentes Á, Manrique MA, Pérez-Valle E, Cerna-Cardona J, Gómez-Peña-Alfaro NS, Hernández-Velázquez NN, Espino-Cortés H, Peñavera-Hernández R, Chávez-García MÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 77-82
PDF size: 142.06 Kb.


Key words:

Eosinophilic esophagitis, dysphagia, esophageal trachealization, crepe-paper mucosa, eosinophilic infiltrate, linear forrows, treatment resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an emerging disease characterized by a dense eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. The main symptoms are dysphagia and esophageal food obstruction, in response to a hypersensitivity reaction to different foods or aeroallergens. Material and methods. We developed an observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study. We included patients of both genders, children and adults, with clinical suspicion of EE or dysphagia. Also patients with esophageal food impaction with normal endoscopy and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical treatment were included. Patients with esophagitis and its complications and those with any endoscopic anomaly were excluded. Patients chosen for the study, four biopsies samples from the proximal and distal esophagus were obtain for histopathological analysis. In each patient we documented age, gender, reference service, medical history (allergies, asthma, rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and chronic cough), endoscopic and histopathological findings. Results. A total of 65 patients, 63 adults and 2 children were included, 39 men (60%) and 26 women(40%). The mean adult age was 50 years old. The indications for performing the EGD were: GERD (60%), dysphagia (35%), esophageal food impaction (5%). Eight patients (12%) had atopic diseases. Thirty-five patients (53.8%) had suggestive endoscopic findings of EE; 23(65.7%) had “trachealization” of the esophagus, 8 (22.8%) had crepe-paper mucosa and 4 (11.4%) had white patches. Forty-six patients had histopathological findings suggestive of GERD (70.7%), the rest were reported with normal mucosa. Not a single patient had an histopathological finding suggestive of EE. Conclusions. Despite the endoscopic findings and the high clinical suspicion, none of our patients had eosinophilic esophagitis.


REFERENCES

  1. Dellon ES. Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2013;42: 133-53.

  2. Aamir Ali M, Lam-Himlin D. Eosinophilic esophagitis: a clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic review. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012; 76(6).

  3. Dellon ES, Gibbs WB. Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histologic Findings Distinguish Eosinophilic Esophagitis From Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 1305-13.

  4. Dellon ES. Perspectives in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1066-78.

  5. Liacouras S. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a sistematic review and consensus recomendations for diagnosis and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011.

  6. Straumann A, Simon HU. Eosinophilic esophagitis: escalating epidemiology. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 418-9.

  7. Croese J, Fairley SK, Masson JW, et al. Clinical and endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 516-22.

  8. Prasad G, Alexander J, Schleck C, et al. Epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis. Epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis over three decades in Olmsted county Minnesota. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1055-61.

  9. Hruz P, Bussmann C, Heer P, et al. Escalating epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis: 21 years of prospective population based documentation on Olten County. Sesión de carteles presentada en DDW 2011; mayo 7-10; Chicago, IL, USA.

  10. Bohm M, Sebastiano C, Malik Z, et al. Racial diffrerences in symptoms and endoscopic findings in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis: a 10 year experience in an urban hospital. Sesión de carteles presentada en DDW 2011; mayo 7-10; Chicago, IL, USA.

  11. Francis D, Arora A, Jensen K, et al. The role of GERD in eosinophilic esophagitis. The role of GERD in eosinophilic esophagitis. Sesión de carteles presentada en DDW 2011; mayo 7-10; Chicago, IL, USA.

  12. Gonsalves N, Policarpio-Nicolas M, Zhang Q, et al. Histopathologic variability and endoscopic correlates in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 313-9.

  13. Kapel R, Genta R. Biopsy practice patterns and diagnostic yield in cases suspected eosinophilic esophagitis in the United States. Sesión de carteles presentada en DDW 2011, mayo 7-10; Chicago Ill.

  14. Sffari H, Clayton F, Fang J, et al. Patchy eosinophilic infiltration in an eosiPatchy eosinophilic infiltration in an eosinophilic esophagectomy with implications for clinical biopsy ascertainment of EoE patients. Sesión de carteles presentada en DDW 2011, mayo 7-10; Chicago, IL, USA.

  15. Furuta G, Kagalwalla A, Lee J. The esophageal string test: a novel minimally invasive method for measuring esophageal inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Sesión AGA Reserch Forum presentada en DDW 2011, mayo 7-10; Chicago, IL, USA.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2015;82