medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Hematología, Inmunología y Hemoterapia

ISSN 1561-2996 (Electronic)
ISSN 0864-0289 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Hematol Inmunol Hemoter 2015; 31 (2)

Frequency of antigens in Rh and Kell blood system in blood donors

Vásquez RM, Castillo ED, Pavez EY, Maldonado RM, Mena LA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page: 160-171
PDF size: 102.86 Kb.


Key words:

Rh phenotype, Kell phenotype, erythrocyte antigen frequencies, blood donor.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: immunologic studies performed on blood donors are directed to provide a transfusion therapy compatible with ABO blood group system and Rh system D antigen in the recipient. However, as a way to increase transfusion safety, the interest of expanding the range of antigens to determine and therefore to be tested for compatibility prior to a blood transfusion, arises.
Objective: to determine the frequency of the five major antigens of Rh. system and K1 and K2 antigens of the Kell system in blood donors.
Methods: Cross-sectional study including 200 randomly selected voluntary blood donors from “Centro Productivo Regional de Sangre del Maule” (CPRSM). Phenotyping of five major antigens of Rh. system and K1 and K2 Kell system antigens was carried out. The tube hemagglutination technique with monospecific Coombs sera and DG Gel® was used. The Rh. system D, C, c, E, e antigens and Kell system K1 and K2 antigen phenotypic frequencies were calculated in percentages. The most likely Rh.genotype was determined from the phenotype frequency of this system. Similarly, in Kell system the genotype frequency was determined based on phenotype.

Results: in the Rh.system, 96% of the samples studied had D antigen; 97.5% had the "e" antigen, and 35.5% the E antigen. Antigen C was present in 79 % and “c” in 65.5 %. The most frequent Rh. genotype was CDe/CDe. In Kell system, K1 antigen presented a frequency of 4 %, while antigen K2 presented a 99.5 %. Regarding genotypic frequency, a 96 % of the population showed a K2 (kk) homozygous genotype.
Conclusion: the frequency of the seven antigens studied is similar to that described in other populations.


REFERENCES

  1. Withlock S. Immunohematology for Medical Laboratory technicians. Washington: Delmar, Cengage learning; 2010. p.292

  2. International Society of Blood Transfusion. (homepage on the internet)Committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens. (Citado 2014, Oct 27) Disponible en: http://ibgrl.blood.co.uk/ISBT%20Pages/ISBT%20Terminology%20Pages/Terminolo gy%20Home%20Page.htm

  3. Vásquez M, Maldonado M. Sistemas sanguíneos eritrocitarios de importancia clínica. Talca:Universidad de Talca;2013.p.110.

  4. Murphy MF, Stanworth SJ, Yazer M. Transfusion practice and safety: current status and possibilities for improvement. Vox Sang. 2011;100:46–59.

  5. Ministerio de Salud de Chile. Orientaciones para Centros de Sangre y Unidades de Medicina Transfusional; 2007. p. 206

  6. Daniels G, Castilho L, Flegel WA, Fletcher A, Garratty G, Levene C, et al. International society of blood transfusion committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens: Macao report. Vox Sang 2009;96:153–6.

  7. Keramati MR, Shakibaei H, Kheiyyami MI, Ayatollahi H, Badiei Z, Samayati M, et al. Blood group antigens frequencies in the northeast of Iran. Transfus Apher Sci. 2011;45(2):133-6.

  8. International Society of Blood Transfusion. Blood Group Alleles. Names for RH (ISBT 004) Whorshop 2010. (Consultado: Noviembre 5, 2013). Disponible en http://www.isbtweb.org/working-parties/red-cell-immunogenetics-and-bloodgroup- terminology/blood-group-terminology/blood-group-allele-terminology/

  9. Denomme GA. Molecular basis of blood group expression. Transfus Apher Sci. 2011;44:53-63.

  10. Baptista-Gonzalez H. El sistema Rh, una mirada a fondo. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43(1):3-8.

  11. Daniels G. Molecular blood grouping. Vox Sang. 2004;87(1):63-6.

  12. Flegel W. The Genetics of the Rhesus Blood Group System. Dtsch Arztebl. 2007:104(10):651–7.

  13. Bangham J. Writing, printing, speaking: Rhesus blood-group genetics and nomenclatures in the mid-twentieth century. Br J Hist Sci.2014;47:335-61.

  14. Sanz J, Besses C, Vives J. Hematología clínica. 5ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier. 2006.

  15. Dean L. The Kell blood group. In: Dean L. Blood Groups and Red Cell Antigens Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2005 Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2270/pdf/ch08Kell.pdf [consultado: Enero 22, 2012].

  16. Stowell S, Henry K, Smith N, Hudson K, Halverson G, Park J, et al. Alloantibodies to a paternally derived RBC KELL antigen lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn in a murine model. Blood. 2013;122(8):1494-504.

  17. Muñiz E. Grupos sanguíneos. Significado clínico y funcional. Barcelona: Banc de Sang i teixitis; 2008. p.66

  18. Harmening D. Modern blood banking and transfusion practices. 5ta ed. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2005.

  19. Blacken G, Zimring J, Fu X. Resolution of translation start site for the human Kell glycoprotein. Transfusion. 2013;53(Suppl 2):2882-6.

  20. Hazboun N. The frequency of the most common Kell phenotypes in the Palestinian Population of Bethlehem District; Short Communication, Bethlehem University J. 2010;29:41-5.

  21. Ji Y, Veldhuisen B, Ligthart P, Haer-Wigman L, Jongerius J, Bouinan M, et al. Novel alleles at the Kell blood group locus that lead to Kell variant phenotype in the Dutch population. Transfusion. 2014 Aug. doi: 10.1111/trf.12838.

  22. Armijo O, De la Calle M, Martin E, Rodriguez G, González A, Herrero F, et al. Isoinmunización anti Kell: Manejo clínico de 26 casos. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2010;75(1):91-5.

  23. Aristizabal J, Torres J. Transfusiones en pacientes con pruebas de compatibilidad positivas y en aquellos con anemia hemolítica autoinmune. Iatreia. 2007;20(4):379-87.

  24. Nance ST. Management of alloimmunized patients. ISBT Science Series 2010;5:274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2824.2010.01381.x.

  25. Cortina L, López M. Reacción transfusional hemolítica inmune inmediata. Rev Cubana Hematol Inmunol Hemoter. 2006:22(2):781-800.

  26. Cheng CK, Lee CK, Lin CK. Clinically significant red blood cell antibodies in chronically transfused patients: a survey of Chinese thalassemia major patients and literature review. Transfusion. 2012;52(10):2220-4.

  27. Banc de Sang I Teixits. Normativa ISBT 128.2010. Disponible en: http://www.bancsang.net/es/professionals/normativa.html. [consultado el 15 de julio, 2014].

  28. Cruz M, Iglesias A, Bejar R. Frecuencia de fenotipos del sistema Rh en los donadores del Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación de la Ciudad de México, D.F. Rev Mex Med Tran. 2009;2:117-8.

  29. Thakral B, Saluja K, Sharma R, Marwaha N. Phenotype frequencies of blood group systems (Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, MNS, P, Lewis, and Lutheran) in north Indian blood donors. Transfus Apher Sci. 2010;43(1):17-22.

  30. Cortes Buelvas A. Importancia de la serotipificación completa de donantes. 6º Ciclo internacional de conferencias de la calidad, Ciudad de México. 2012. Disponible en: http://www.ifcc.org/media/216146/Importancia%20de%20la%20serotipificacion% 20completa%20en%20donantes.pdf. [consultado el 22 de julio, 2014].

  31. American Association of Blood Banks. Techinical manual, 15th ed. Bethesda:AABB; 2005. p.603.

  32. Manoi A, Kahar and Rajnikant D. Patel. Phenotype frequencies of blood group systems (Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, MNS, P, Lewis, and Lutheran) in blood donors of south Gujarat, India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014Jan-Jun;8(1):51–5.

  33. Makroo R, Bhatia A, Gupta R, Phillip J. Prevalence of Rh, Duffy, Kell, Kidd & MNSs blood group antigens in the Indian blood donor population. Indian J Med Res. 2013 Mar;137(3):521-6.

  34. Mohamed S, Muna I. Characterization of rh and other blood group systems amongst the maldivian blood donors. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(5):393-6.

  35. Cifuentes L, Valenzuela C, Cruz Coke R, Armanet L, Lyng C, Harb Z. Caracterización genética de la población hospitalaria de Santiago. Rev Med Chile. 1988;116(1):28-33

  36. Acuña M, Llop E, Rothhammer F. Composición genética de la población chilena: las comunidades rurales de los valles de Elqui, Limarí y Choapa. Rev Med Chile. 2000;128(6):593-600.

  37. Musa R, Ahmed S, Hashim H, Ayob Y, Asidin N, Choo P, et al. Red cell phenotyping of blood from donors at the National blood center of Malaysia. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2012:6(1):3-9.

  38. Moraga, M. Genética de poblaciones II: origen y evolución de la población chilena. 2007. Disponible en: http://docencia.med.uchile.cl/evolucion/paginasnuevas2007/MMORAGA2007.PDF [ (consultado el 13 de agosto, 2014].

  39. Schonewille H, van de Watering L, Loomans D, Brand A. Red blood cell alloantibodies after transfusion: factors influencing incidence and specificity. Transfusion.2006;46(2):250-6.

  40. Lau F, Wong R, Chan N, Chui CH, Ng E, Cheng G. Provision of phenotypematched blood units: no need for pre-transfusion screening. Haematologica, 2001;86(7):742-48.

  41. Alcaraz L, Bonilla E, Luna J, Montes M, Sanchez R, Chavez M. Investigación en el trabajo diario de inmunohematología. Fenotipos eritrocitarios y protocolo para encontrar sangre compatible en pacientes con aloanticuerpos antieritrocitos. Gac Méd Méx. 2007;143(2):23-7.

  42. Rashmi S, Makroo R, Vimarsh R, Rosamma N. Detection of alloimmunization to ensure safer transfusion practice. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2013;7(2):135–9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Hematol Inmunol Hemoter . 2015;31