medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2015; 11 (2)

Types of scientific publications

Jiménez ÁJM

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 58-67
PDF size: 275.72 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Publish is a need that becomes increasingly important; the main factor that limits is the «act of writing». We must finish our quality research with good writing in order to obtain diffusion and impact. The research documents are the protocol in which a research project is planned, the manuscript in which the results of research are written and scientific paper that is the publication of research in a scientific journal, that brings new knowledge not previously published. The publications can be divided into primary so called for presenting research results not previously reported, secondary are those in which primary publications are explicitly analyzed and tertiary or articles of scientific opinion.


REFERENCES

  1. Contreras AM, Ochoa-Jiménez RJ. Guía de Redacción de Artículos Originales en Ciencias de la Salud. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México: Ediciones de la Noche; 2012. 522 ISBN 978-607-9147-15-0.

  2. Cohen S. Redacción sin dolor. Aprenda a escribir con claridad y precisión. 1994.

  3. Day RA. Cómo escribir y publicar trabajos científicos. 3ª edición. Washington: OPS 2005. p. 253.

  4. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A. Reporting financial conflicts of interest and relationships between investigators and resarch sponsor. JAMA. 2001; 286 (1): 89-91.

  5. Glick M. You are what you cite: the role of references in scientific publishing. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138: 12-14.

  6. Hernández SR, Fernández CC, Baptista LP. Metodología de la investigación. 4ª edición. México DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, Capítulo 7, Concepción o elección del diseño de investigación; 2006. pp. 157-231.

  7. Peat J, Elliot E, Baur L, Keena B. Scientific writing easy when you know how. London: BMJ Books, 2002. p. 292.

  8. Sahu DR, Abraham P. Authorship: rules, rights, responsabilities and recommendations. J Postgrad Med. 2000; 46 (3): 205-210.

  9. Quindós G. Confundiendo al confuso: reflexiones sobre el factor de impacto, el índice h (irsch), el factor Q y otros cofactores que influyen en la felicidad del investigador. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2009; 26: 97-102.

  10. Tomaska L. Teaching how to prepare a manuscript by means of rewriting published scientific papers. Genetics. 2007; 175 (1): 17-20.

  11. Rivera H: El índice h: criterio necesario en la evaluación de investigadores. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011; 49 (2): 123-124.

  12. Wendl MC. H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature. 2007; 449: 403.

  13. Kellner AWA, Ponciano LCMO. H-index int the Brazilian Academy of Sciences comments and concerns. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2008; 80: 771-781.

  14. Bornman L, Daniel HD. The state of h index research. EMBO Rep. 2009; 10: 2-6.

  15. Zhang C-T. The e-index, comprementing the h-index for excess citations. Plos ONE. 2009; 4 (5): e5429.

  16. Butson MJ, Yu PK. The first author h-index (h(fa)-index): leveling the field for small and large institute medical and science scholars. Australias Phys Eng Sci med. 2010; 33: 399-300.

  17. Shekelle P, Woolf S, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines. Developing guidelines BMJ 1999; 318: 593-596.

  18. Gordon G, Drummond R. Guías para usuarios de literatura médica. Manual para la práctica clínica basada en la evidencia. Encontrar la evidencia. JAMA; 2004. p. 17.

  19. Falavigna A. Jiménez-Avila JM. AOSpine. Educación en Investigación: De la idea a la publicación. Traco Diferencial. ISBN 978-85-7061-742-2. 2014.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com