medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias

A partir del año 2010, la Revista Oficial del INER cambió a NCT (Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax)

Ver actualización

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex 2000; 13 (3)

Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity between bronchial cytology and histology in patients with lung cancer. A ten year review.

Peña MES, Vázquez MME
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 139-144
PDF size: 672.07 Kb.


Key words:

Lung tumor, brush biopsy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Lung cancer is the second mortality cause in Mexico, therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the degree of diagnostic certainty of histology and cytology studies used at the National Institute of Respiratory Disease, where a sample quality control method is also needed. Material and methods: All cases of bronchial lavage, brushing and biopsies registered in the Pathology Department of this Institute from 1989 to 1998 were reviewed. Results: of 1,094 cases, 430 were females and 664 were males. The most frequent was adenocarcinoma with 501 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of bronchial lavage and brushing was 62, 58, 65 and 54% respectively, and its predictive value 83 and 80%. The correlation coefficient was 97% Conclusions: The three studies in conjunction are one of the most sensitive methods to identify pulmonary neoplasms.


REFERENCES

  1. Masoyoshi T. Atlas color. Citología del cáncer. 2a ed. México: Panamericana, 1995.

  2. Philip SH. Spencer’s pathology of the lung. 5a ed. London: International, 1996.

  3. Dudgeon LS, Barrett NR. The examination of fresh tissues by the wet-film method. Br J Surg 1934: 22: 4-22.

  4. Bendassat J, Regev A, Slater PE. Predictive value of sputum cytology. Thorax 1987: 42: 165-172.

  5. Mak VHF, Johnston IDA, Hetzel MR, Grubb C. Value of washings and brushings at fibreopctic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Thorax 1990: 45: 373-376.

  6. Kvale PA, Bode FR, Kini S. Diagnostic accuracy in lung cancer. Comparison of thecniques used in association with flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1976: 69: 752-757.

  7. Zavala DC. Diagnostic fibreoptic bronchoscopy: Techniques and results of biopsy in 600 patients. Chest 1975: 68: 12-19.

  8. Wolfgang P, Monika M, Brigitte S. How much brushing is enough for the diagnosis of lung tumors?. Cancer 1992: 70: 2278-2280.

  9. Funahashi A, Browne TK, Houser WC, Hranicka LJ. Diagnostic value of bronchial aspirate and postbronchoscopic sputum in fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1979; 76, 514-517.

  10. Ellis JH Jr. Transbronchial lung biopsy via the fiberoptic bronchoscope: Experience with 107 consecutive cases and comparison with bronchial brushing. Chest 1975; 68: 524-532.

  11. Saltzstein SL, Harrell JH, Cameron T. Brushings, washings or biopsy? Obtaining maximum value from flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of cancer. Chest 1977; 71: 630-632.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex. 2000;13