medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular

ISSN 1561-2937 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2015; 21 (2)

Transulnar via cardiac catheterization. A second option?

Rodríguez BS, Leyva QA, Valdés RM, Almeida GJ, Ponte GG, Aguilar MJM, Ley RM, Pérez GJC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 66-69
PDF size: 240.59 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Rodríguez S, Leyva A, Valdés M, Almeida J, Ponte G, Garc-ía RA. Vía de acceso transradial. Evidencia científica y curva de aprendizaje. Rev CubanaCardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2014;20:123-30.

  2. Riekkinen HV, Karkola KO, Kankainen A. The radial artery is larger than the ulnar. Ann Thorac Surg.2003;75:882–4.

  3. Ashraf T, Panhwar Z, Habib S, Memon MA, Shamsi F, Arif J. Size of radial and ulnar artery in local population. J Pak Med Assoc.2010;60:817–9.

  4. Deshmukh AR, Kaushik M, Aboeata A, Abuzetun J, Burns T L, Nubel, C, et al. Efficacy and safety of transulnar coronary angiography and interventions—A single center experience. CathetCardiovascIntervent. 2014;83:E26–31.

  5. de Andrade PB, Tebet MA, Noguiera EF, Esteves VC, de Andrade MV, Labrunie A, et al.Transulnar approach as an al-ternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial failure. Am Heart J.2012;164:462–7.

  6. Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, Bussy N, Cata-rino G, Shahmir A, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter CardiovascInterv. 2006;67:711-20.

  7. Hahalis G, Tsigkas G, Xanthopoulou I,Deftereos S, Ziakas A, Raisakis K, et al. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: A randomized trial. The transulnar or transradial instead of coronary transfemoral angiographies study (the AURA of ARTEMIS study). CircCardiovascInterv. 2013;6:252-61.

  8. Li YZ, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Guo YH, Liu YY, Shi DM, et al. Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary an-giography and intervention.Chin Med J.2010;123:1774-9.

  9. Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, Petkoska D. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 2014;83:E51–60.

  10. Rodríguez-Olivares R, García-Touchard A, Fernández-Díaz JA, Oteo JF, Zorita B, Goicolea J. Abordaje transulnar con arteria radial homolateral ocluida: descripción de la vascula-rización del antebrazo y seguimiento a largo pla-zo.RevEspCardiol. 2014;67:854-5.

  11. Vassilev D, Smilkova D, Gil R. Ulnar artery as access site for cardiac catheterization: anatomical considerations.J Interv-Cardiol. 2008;21:56-60.

  12. Ley M. Efectividad de la Vía de Acceso Transcubital en el Cateterismo Cardiaco. [Trabajo de terminación de residencia para optar por el título de especialista de Primer Grado en Cardiología]. La Habana: Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Her-manos Ameijeiras; 2014.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2015;21