Valdés SO

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 1-4
PDF size: 308.40 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Campanario JM. El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): muchos problemas y pocas soluciones. Rev. Esp. Doc. Cient. 25; 3, 2002. Pág. 267- 85.

2. Ziman, J. Public knowledge: The social dimension of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1968.

3. Mcnutt, R.A., Evans, A.T., Fletcher, R.H., Fletcher, S.W. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990, vol 263, p. 1371-1374.

4. Garfunkel, J.M., Ulshen, M.H., Hamrick, H.J., Lawson, E.E. Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990, vol 263, p. 1369-1371.

5. Gardner, M.J., Bond, J. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990, vol 263, p. 1355-1357.

6. Lock, S. A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine, London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1985.

7. Gura, T. Peer review unmasked. Nature, 2002, vol 416, 258-260.