Delgado MM

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 272-274
PDF size: 152.07 Kb.

ABSTRACT

For many years now, cast posts have been regarded as standard in prosthetics despite the technical and mechanical limitations caused by their high moduli of elasticity, which prevent the forces involved from being effectively dissipated and, therefore, concentrate stress within the root canal. Scientific evidence-based literature describes fiberglass posts with moduli of elasticity similar to or approaching that of dentin as having anisotropic properties, as opposed to the isotropic properties of traditional posts. We propose a restorative approach that involves the post, the cement, and the dentin, forming a homogeneous complex known as a «monobloc» that enables enhanced mechanical behavior that benefits the remaining tooth structure.

REFERENCES

1. Dreyer E. Rehabilitación de la pieza dentaria endodónticamente tratada. Rol del perno-muñón. Revista de la Sociedad de Endodoncia de Chile. 2006; 14: 40-44.

2. Coltene/Whaledent Technical Manual. 2000.

3. Parodi G. Comportamiento de la dentina del diente despulpado. Factores biológicos y mecánicos. Odontología Uruguaya. 1995; 1: 14-20.

4. Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the surface of fiber post after cutting. J Endod. 2002; 28 (2): 610-612.

5. Chieruzzi M, Pagano S, Pennacchi M, Lombardo G, D’Errico P, Kenny JM. Compressive and flexural behaviour of fibre reinforced endodontic posts. J Dent. 2012; 40: 968-978.

6. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61: 535-543.

7. Scotti R, Ferrari M. Pernos de fibra. Bases y aplicaciones clínicas. Barcelona: Ed. Masson; 2004.

8. Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 151-157.

9. Duret B, Reynaud M. Fiber post carbono. Chir Dent Fr. 1990; 22: 131-141.

10. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 15-18.

11. Texeira FB, Pisack JR, Thompson JY. An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post system. JADA. 2006; 137: 1006-1012.

12. Conceicäo NE. Odontología restauradora. Salud y estética. 2a edición. Madrid: Ed. Med. Panamericana; 2008.

13. Nissan J, Dimitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 304-308.

14. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post and core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 301-306.

15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 422-429.

16. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982; 16: 265-273.