medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2015, Number 12

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2015; 83 (12)

Factors associated with successful vaginal birth in women with a cesarean section history

Sepúlveda-Mendoza DL, Galván-Caudillo M, Soto-Fuenzalida GA, Méndez-Lozano DH

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 743-749
PDF size: 428.51 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Bakcground: Caesarean section is the main proceedings for ending of pregnancy in the world, and currently represents a public health problem. Some factors that benefit the likelihood of vaginal birth after a previous C-section have been described in literature, with scoring tools designed to predict success for trial of labor after a previous cesarean. There are few studies that identify predictors of success for vaginal delivery in Latin-American patients
Objective: To identify predictive factors associated to vaginal delivery success in patients with a prior cesarean delivery.
Material and method: Case-control study. We included patients with one previous cesarean delivery admitted at our hospital. The variables analyzed with a logistic regression system to predict vaginal delivery success probabilities.
Results: A total of 1160 patients were included, 668 underwent C-section (considered control group), and 492 patients had a vaginal delivery (considered study group). The Factors associated to vaginal birth after cesarean delivery were maternal age (25.1±5.4 vs 24.7±5.5 years old, OR 0.967, p‹0.05), fetal weight (3,253±389 vs 3,383±452 g, OR 0.99, p‹0.05), previous vaginal delivery (49 vs 18.4%, OR 2.97, p‹0.05) and spontaneous labor (90.8 vs 74.1%, OR 3.68, p‹0.05, respectively).
Conclusion: Maternal age, fetal weight, previous vaginal delivery and spontaneous labor were associated with vaginal delivery success in patients with a previous cesarean delivery.


REFERENCES

  1. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1181-93.

  2. Guía de Práctica Clínica: IMSS. Reducción de la Frecuencia de Operación Cesárea. Evidencias y Recomendaciones. 2014 [en línea]. Dirección URL: .

  3. Suárez L, Campero L, De la Vara-Salazar E, Rivera L, Hernández MI, Walker D, y col. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Elevada recurrencia de las cesáreas: revertir la tendencia y mejorar la calidad en el parto. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud 2012.

  4. Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: A meta-analysis. Birth 2007;34:53-64.

  5. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise J-M. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:262.

  6. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010:116:450-63.

  7. Gregory KD, Korst LM, Fridman M, Shihady I, Broussard P, Fink A, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:452.

  8. García-Flores A, Villazón-Villaroel HE. Investigación de la resolución del embarazo de término secundaria a cesárea previa. Hospital Materno Infantil “German Urquidi”. Rev Med (Cochabamba) 2008;19:29.

  9. DiMaio H, Edwards RK, Euliano TY, Treloar RW, Cruz AC. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an historic cohort cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:890-2.

  10. Shanks AL, Cahill AG. Delivery after prior cesarean: success rate and factors. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:233-45.

  11. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:56.

  12. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:30.

  13. Rossi a C, D’Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:224-31.

  14. Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Macones GA. The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:210.

  15. Go MD, Emeis C, Guise J-M, Schelonka RL. Fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality following delivery after previous cesarean. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:311-19.

  16. Eden KB, Mcdonagh M, Denman MA, Marshall N. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:967-81.

  17. Bangal VB, Giri P a, Shinde KK, Gavhane SP. Vaginal birth after cesarean section. N Am J Med Sci 2013;5:140-4.

  18. Loebel G, Zelop CM, Egan JF, Wax J. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:243-6.

  19. Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Fanaroff A, Hack M. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997;100:348-53.

  20. Finster M, Wood M. The Apgar score has survived the test of time. Anesthesiology 2005;102:855-7.

  21. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:824-30.

  22. Cuero-Vidal OL, Clavijo-Prado CA. Parto vaginal después de una cesárea previa, Hospital San Juan De Dios, Cali (Colombia). Estudio de cohorte. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2011;62:148-54.

  23. Guise J, Berlin M, Mcdonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean : a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;103:420-9.

  24. Stamilio D, DeFranco E, Paré E, Odibo A, Peipert J, Allsworth J, et al. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1075-82.

  25. Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ. Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:800-5.

  26. Hashima JN, Guise J-M. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a prenatal scoring tool. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:e22-23.

  27. Harper LM, Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Macones GA. Effect of gestational age at the prior cesarean delivery on maternal morbidity in subsequent VBAC attempt. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:276.e1-6.

  28. Flamm B, Geiger A. Vaginal birth after cesarean: An admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:907-10.

  29. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY. Development of a Nomogram for Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:806-12.

  30. Zupancic JAF. The economics of elective cesarean section. Clin Perinatol 2008;35:591-9.

  31. Smith GCS, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med 2005;2:0871-8.

  32. Sánchez R, Ortiz HI, Chávez A. Parto vaginal en pacientes con antecedente de una cesárea previa. Rev Fac Med UNAM 2003;46:28-31.

  33. Puentes-Rosas E, Gómez-Dantés O, Garrido-Latorre F. Las cesáreas en México: tendencias, niveles y factores asociados. Salud Publica Mex 2004;46:16-22.

  34. Benavides-de Anda L. Conducta durante el trabajo de parto de la mujer con cesárea previa. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1953;8:336-47.

  35. Landon MB. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2008;35:491-504.

  36. Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Paré E, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Allsworth JE, et al. Short interpregnancy interval. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1075-82.

  37. Signore C, Spong CY. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights manuscripts from a National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, March 8-10, 2010. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:235-6.

  38. RCOG. Operative vaginal delivery (Green-top Guideline No. 26). [en línea]. Dirección URL: .




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com