medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ing Biomed 2015; 36 (3)

Implementation of a heterodyne demodulator for blood flow sense discrimination in a bi-directional ultrasonic Doppler detector

García F, Solano J, Fuentes M, Rubio E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 249-256
PDF size: 903.23 Kb.


Key words:

Doppler flowmetry, blood flow, heterodyne separation.

ABSTRACT

Doppler ultrasound systems have been widely used in medical diagnosis, in the study of blood flow, in particular, in the diagnosis of vascular disorders. This is mainly due to its non-invasive method and its relatively low cost. An important feature of the ultrasonic Doppler system is the capability to detect the signal associated with the blood flow and discriminate its direction. The Doppler ultrasound signal contains information associated with the velocity of the blood components, and its frequency spectrum represents the velocity profile of blood flow, which may be direct or reverse. Typically Doppler ultrasound systems which detect the sense of the direction of blood flow signal, are based on methods of homodyne demodulation in quadrature. However the signals produced by these detectors require an additional separation process.
This paper addresses the implementation of a heterodyne demodulator as a part of a Doppler ultrasound detector for measuring bi-directional blood flow. We describe the detection process of the Doppler ultrasound blood flow signal and its representation in the form of a two-dimensional spectrogram. Doppler blood flow sensing devices and their classification according to their operation mode and type of demodulation are also described. Finally, functionality tests are presented and results are analyzed.


REFERENCES

  1. D. H. Evans, W. Norman McDicken, “Doppler Ultrasound Physics, Instrumentation and Signal Processing,” Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2000

  2. P. Atkinson, “A fundamental interpretation of ultrasonic dopplervelocimeter,” Ultrasound in Med. Biol., vol. 2, pp. 107-111, 1975.

  3. F. García, J. Solano, M. Fuentes, E. Rubio, “Detección del Sentido del Flujo Sanguíneo Utilizando Demodulación Heterodina para un Sistema Doppler Ultrasónico y su Validación Mediante Simulación,” Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica, vol. 36, no. 1, Ene-Abr, pp. 23-31, 2015.

  4. J.V.L. Hogan, “The Heterodyne Receiver,” Electronic Journal, vol. 18, pp. 116, 1921.

  5. N. Aydin, D. H. Evans, “Quadrature to directional format conversion of Doppler signals using digital methods,” Physiol Meas, vol. 15, pp. 181-199, 1994.

  6. Richard Lyons. Quadrature Signals: Complex, But Not Complicated. Tutorial, 2008. www.ieee.li/pdf/essay/quadrature_ signals.pdf

  7. F. García-Nocetti, J. Solano-González, M. Fuentes-Cruz, E. Moreno- Hernández, A. Villar-Inclán, J. Prohias- Martínez, “Doppler Ultrasound Blood Flow Measurement System,” 19th International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, España, ISBN:84-87985-12-2 ULT-15-003.PDF, 2007.

  8. NXP Semiconductor, SA602A, Doublebalanced mixer and oscillator, Product data sheet, Rev.3, May 2014.

  9. G. D’Ancona, H.L. Karamanoukian, M.Ricci, T.A. Salermo and J. Bergsland, “Intraoperative Graft Patency Verification in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery,” Futura Publishing Company, Inc. 2001




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ing Biomed. 2015;36