medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (1)

Sagittal cephalometric diagnosis using Power Point (Microsoft® Office)

Silva MR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 9-17
PDF size: 740.16 Kb.


Key words:

Cephalometric analysis, cephalometrics, Power Point.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe a sagittal cephalometric analysis using Power Point Microsoft® Office. Method: The digital image of a class I normodivergent 13-year-old female with ideal features and no prior orthodontic treatment was used. The corresponding tracings were made using Power Point (Microsoft® Office) tools.


REFERENCES

  1. Broadbent HB. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931; 1: 45-46. Reprinted in Angle Orthodontist 1981; 51: 93-114.

  2. Ridel RA. Cephalometric roentgen graphic study of the relation on the maxilla and associated parts to the cranial base in normal and malocclusion of the teeth MSD [Thesis]. Chicago Illinois: North-western University; 1948.

  3. Mc Namara JA, Brudom WL. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in the mixed dentition. Ann Arbor: Needham press; 1993; 2: 38

  4. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1952; 38: 162-182.

  5. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953; 39: 729-755.

  6. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Am J Orthod. 1961; 31: 141-156.

  7. Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod. 1974; 65: 586-611.

  8. Jacobson A. The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975; 67 (2): 125-138.

  9. Legan H, Burstone C. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1980; 38: 744-751.

  10. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51: 115-150.

  11. McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86 (6): 449-469.

  12. Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a Relationship? Angle Orthod. 1985; 55 (2): 127-138.

  13. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthop Dentofacial Orthod. 1993; 103 (4): 299-312.

  14. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthop Dentofacial Orthod. 1993; 103 (5): 395-411.

  15. Fastlicht RJ. Tetragon: visual cephalometric analysis. J Clin Orthod. 2000; 33 (6): 353-360.

  16. Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle in orthodontics diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod. 1954; 24 (3): 121-169.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2016;4