medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)

2003, Number 1

<< Back

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2003; 4 (1)

Surgical robotic in Mexico Intelligent instrument systems, current perspectives

Miller FHS

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 45-50
PDF size: 90.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The latest advancements in technology in the past 20 years of the XX century in the areas of Informatics, Engineering, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Genetics as well as in the Military Media; has allowed the development of the necessary tools for the creation of microcameras, high resolution video systems, the beginnings of the third dimension images, simulators and virtual reality; robotics applied to medicine and microrobotics, the creation of intelligent operating rooms, and the appearance of telepresence and nanotechnology. All previously mentioned with the main purpose of offering more dexterity to medical doctors and surgeons, diminish the operating times and diminish the pain to a maximum with a faster recuperation. Mexico has had a great participation in these events as in Endoscopic surgery and continues to be at the highest level. In this New Millennium thanks to the previous advancements, it has been possible to do the first transatlantic surgery on a female patient 68 years old with cholecistitis, operating the patient from New York, United States of America while the patient being in Strasburg, France; 7,000 kilometers of distance.


REFERENCES

  1. Muhe E. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-late results]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1991: 416-23. German.

  2. Muhe E. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 754-8.

  3. Satava RM. Surgery in space. Phase I: Basic surgical principles in a simulated space environment. Surgery 1988; 103: 633-7.

  4. Peck ML. The future of nursing in the technological age: computers, robots and TLC. J Holist Nurse 1992; 10: 183-91.

  5. Satava RM. Nintendo surgery. JAMA 1992; 267: 2329-30.

  6. Melzer A, Schurr MO, Kunert W, Buess G, Voges U, Meyer JU. Intelligent surgical Instrument systems ISIS. Concept and preliminary experimental application of components and prototypes. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1993; 1: 165-79.

  7. Satava RM, Simon IB. Teleportation, telerobotics and telepresence in surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Techcnol 1993; 1: 151-3.

  8. Sackier JM, Wang Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 63-66.

  9. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Partin AW, Bender JS, Zenilman ME, Satava RM. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: initial laboratory and clinical experience. Urology 1994; 44: 15-9.

  10. Kavoussi LR, More RG, Adams JB, Partin AW. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 1995; 154: 2134-6.

  11. Satava RM. Virtual reality, telesurgery, and the new world order of medicine. J Image Guid Surg 1995; 1: 12-6.

  12. Sackier JM. Phantoms and pixels, apparitions and apparatus: image guided general surgery. J Image Guid Surg 1995; 1: 75-9.

  13. Schurr MO, Breitweiser H, Melzer A, Kunert W, Schmitt M, Voges U. Experimental telemanipulation in encdoscopic surgery 1996; 6: 167-75.

  14. Geis WP, Kim HC, Brennan EJ Jr. McAffe PC, Wang Y. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased recourse utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 1996; 29: 471-81.

  15. Visarius H, Gong J, Scheer C, Haralamb S, Noite LP. Man-machine interfaces in computer assisted surgery. Comput Aided Surg 1997; 2: 102-7.

  16. Perissat J, Collet D, Monguillon N. Advances in laparoscopic surgery. Digestion 1998; 59: 606-18.

  17. Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 54-5.

  18. Sackier JM, Wooters C, Jacobs L, Halverson A, Uecker D, Wang Y. Voice activation of a surgical robotic assistant. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 406-9.

  19. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynecological Endoscopic surgery 1998; 13: 2748-50.

  20. Satava RM, Jones SB. Laparoscopic surgery. Transition to the future. Urol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 93-102.

  21. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Hahan JF. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 957-61.

  22. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999; 9: 107-13.

  23. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, Bohem DH, Gulbins H, Detter C. Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system Zeus for Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 11-6.

  24. Satava RM. Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1197-202.

  25. Rininsland H. ARTEMIS. A telemanipulator for cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16 Suppl 2: s106-11.

  26. Buess GF, Arezzo A, Schurr MO, Ulmer F, Fisher H, Gumb L, Testa T, Nobman C. A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endosocopic surgery. The FIPS endoarm. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 395-9

  27. Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for Endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery Surg In: Endosc 2000; 14: 375-81.

  28. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1040-2.

  29. Mosso JVL et al. Colecistectomías laparoscópicas asistidas por un brazo robot teleoperado a 10 metros de distancia. Ciruj General 1999; 21: 197-203.

  30. Mosso JVL, Joscowics L. Desarrollo de la cirugía guiada por computadora. Ciruj General 1998; 20: 128-129.

  31. Mosso JVL, Minor MA, Lara VV, Maya E. Brazo robótico para sujetar y posicionar laparoscopios. Primer diseño y construcción en México. Cir Ciruj 2001; 69: 295-299.

  32. Hoffman HM. Teaching and learning with virtual reality. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 79: 285-9.

  33. Satava RM. Accomplishments and challenges of surgical simulation. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 232-41.

  34. Go PM, Payne JH, Satava RM, Rosser JC. Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 105-6.

  35. Miller HS, Sackier JM, Reyes A, Hernandez JT, Garibaldi JR. Surgical robotic assistance. Is it possible in Latinamerica? Robotic surgery in México! The Mexican experience since 1996. Surg Endosc 2002; 16 Suppl 1: page pending.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com