medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2016; 73 (1)

Compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate in combination with 2% lidocaine or chlorhexidine

Barcha BDA, Cataño MLC, Simancas PMÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 11-16
PDF size: 229.20 Kb.


Key words:

Chlorhexidine, lidocaine, distilled water, endodontics.

ABSTRACT

Background: Mineral trioxide aggregate remains the material of choice for repairing furcal perforations and ensure the continued root development of immature teeth. Its effect on biomechanical behavior is optimized when mixed with distilled water. Nevertheless, various studies have looked at the possibility of combining it with other mixing agents, such as chlorhexidine and even hypochlorite solution. Objective: To compare the compressive strength (CS) of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) combined with distilled water, 2% lidocaine plus 1:80,000 epinephrine, and 2% chlorhexidine. Material and methods: In vitro experimental laboratory study. We prepared 30 discs of gray MTA (G-MTA) mixed with the three substances (n = 10). Each disc was 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm high, wrapped in a moist gauze, and then left to set for 72 hours at 37 oC and 100% humidity. The compressive strength of each sample was subsequently measured using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, INC., Columbia, NY, USA). The samples were then compressed at a rate of 1 mm/min and the CS was recorded in megapascals (MPa). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Stata V.13.1 for Windows. Results: The distilled water group showed the highest CS values (8.32 ± 3.62 MPa), followed by the 2% lidocaine plus 1:80,000 epinephrine group (6.60 ± 3.42 MPa), and finally the 2% chlorhexidine group (5.15 ± 2.25 MPa). Nevertheless, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Based on the results obtained in this study, we can conclude that G-MTA mixed with distilled water continues to provide superior physical properties, which suggests it is the best option for endodontic procedures. However, given the lack of statistically significant differences, there are other materials that could potentially be regarded as acceptable mixing agents.


REFERENCES

  1. Xu Q, Ling JQ, Gu HJ, Liu JW. Clinical management of open apices teeth with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as apical barrier in adults. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006; 24 (4): 312-314, 317.

  2. Witherspoon DE, Ham K. One-visit apexification: technique for inducing root-end barrier formation in apical closures. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001; 13 (6): 455-460; quiz 462.

  3. Witherspoon DE. Vital pulp therapy with new materials: new directions and treatment perspectives-permanent teeth. J Endod. 2008; 34 (7 Suppl): S25-S28.

  4. Villa P, Fernández R. Apexification of a replanted tooth using mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Traumatol. 2005; 21 (5): 306-308.

  5. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995; 21 (7): 349-353.

  6. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod. 2010; 36 (2): 190-202.

  7. White JD, Lacefield WR, Chavers LS, Eleazer PD. The effect of three commonly used endodontic materials on the strength and hardness of root dentin. J Endod. 2002; 28 (12): 828-830.

  8. Shetty KH, Prathap MS, Prithviraj KJ. Sealing ability of white and gray mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with distilled water and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate as a root end filling material: an ex vivo evaluation. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24 (3): 395.

  9. Basturk FB, Nekoofar MH, Gunday M, Dummer PM. The effect of various mixing and placement techniques on the compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2013; 39 (1): 111-114.

  10. Formosa LM, Mallia B, Camilleri J. Mineral trioxide aggregate with anti-washout gel-properties and microstructure. Dent Mater. 2013; 29 (3): 294-306.

  11. Holt DM, Watts JD, Beeson TJ, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. The anti-microbial effect against Enterococcus faecalis and the compressive strength of two types of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with sterile water or 2% chlorhexidine liquid. J Endod. 2007; 33 (7): 844-847.

  12. Rao A, Shenoy R. Mineral trioxide aggregate-a review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009; 34 (1): 1-7.

  13. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. J Endod. 2006; 32 (3): 193-197.

  14. Mittag SG, Eissner C, Zabel L, Wrbas KT, Kielbassa AM. The influence of chlorhexidine on the antibacterial effects of MTA. Quintessence Int. 2012; 43 (10): 901-906.

  15. Yan P, Peng B, Fan B, Fan M, Bian Z. The effects of sodium hypochlorite (5.25%), chlorhexidine (2%), and glyde file prep on the bond strength of MTA-dentin. J Endod. 2006; 32 (1): 58-60.

  16. Witherspoon DE, Small JC, Regan JD, Nunn M. Retrospective analysis of open apex teeth obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2008; 34 (10): 1171-1176.

  17. Felippe WT, Felippe MC, Rocha MJ. The effect of mineral trioxide aggregate on the apexification and periapical healing of teeth with incomplete root formation. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (1): 2-9.

  18. Pradhan DP, Chawla HS, Gauba K, Goyal A. Comparative evaluation of endodontic management of teeth with unformed apices with mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide. J Dent Child (Chic). 2006; 73 (2): 79-85.

  19. Watts JD, Holt DM, Beeson TJ, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. Effects of pH and mixing agents on the temporal setting of tooth-colored and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2007; 33 (8): 970-973.

  20. Kogan P, He J, Glickman GN, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. J Endod. 2006; 32 (6): 569-572.

  21. Singh H, Kapoor P, Dhillon J, Kaur M. Evaluation of three different concentrations of chlorhexidine for their substantivity to human dentin. Indian J Dent. 2014; 5 (4): 199-201.

  22. Lee BN, Hwang YC, Jang JH, Chang HS, Hwang IN, Yang SY et al. Improvement of the properties of mineral trioxide aggregate by mixing with hydration accelerators. J Endod. 2011; 37 (10): 1433-1436.

  23. Ulusoy OI, Nayir Y, Darendeliler-Yaman S. Effect of different root canal sealers on fracture strength of simulated immature roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112 (4): 544-547.

  24. Hernández EP, Botero TM, Mantellini MG, McDonald NJ, Nor JE. Effect of ProRoot MTA mixed with chlorhexidine on apoptosis and cell cycle of fibroblasts and macrophages in vitro. Int Endod J. 2005; 38 (2): 137-143.

  25. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2005; 31 (2): 97-100.

  26. Zapf AM, Chedella SC, Berzins DW. Effect of additives on mineral trioxide aggregate setting reaction product formation. J Endod. 2015; 41 (1): 88-91.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2016;73