Shankar N, AlBasheer M, Marotta P, Wall W, McAlister V, Chandok N

Language: English
References: 8
Page: 477-481
PDF size: 46.95 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Liver transplantation is a highly effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. However, there is debate over the practice of liver transplantation in older recipients (age ≥ 60 years) given the relative shortage of donor grafts, worse post-transplantation survival, and concern that that older patients may utilize excess resources postoperatively, thus threatening the economic feasibility of the procedure. Aim. To determine if patients ≥ 60 years of age utilize more health resources following liver transplantation compared with younger patients. Material and methods. Consecutive adult patients who underwent primary liver transplantation (n = 208) at a single center were studied over a 2.5-year period. Data were collected on clinico-demographic characteristics and resource utilization. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, or frequencies were obtained for baseline variables. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: age ≥ 60 years (n = 51) and ‹ 60 years (n = 157). The Chi-Square Test, Mantel-Haenszel Test, 2-sample test and odds ratios were calculated to ascertain associations between age and resource utilization parameters. Regression analyses were adjusted for model for end-stage liver disease score, location before surgery, diabetes mellitus, donor age, cold ischemia time, albumin, and diagnosis of hepatitis C. Results. Recipients ≥ 60 years of age have similar lengths of hospitalization, re-operative rates, need for consultative services and readmission rates following liver transplantation, but have longer lengths of stay in the intensive care (hazard ratio 1.97, p = 0.03). Conclusion. Overall, liver transplant recipients ≥ 60 years of age utilize comparable resources following LT vs. younger recipients. Our findings have implications on cost-containment policies for liver transplantation.

REFERENCES

1. D’Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, Marubini E. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 1986; 31(5): 468-75.

2. United Network for Organ Sharing 2011.

3. Floreani A. Liver disorders in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23(6): 909-17.

4. Lim YS, Kim WR. The global impact of hepatic fibrosis and end-stage liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 2008; 12(4): 733- 46, vii.

5. Olsen SK, Brown RS Jr. Live donor liver transplantation: current status. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2008; 10(1): 36-42.

6. Taylor MC, Greig PD, Detsky AS, McLeod RS, Abdoh A, Krahn MD. Factors associated with the high cost of liver transplantation in adults. Can J Surg 2002; 45(6): 425-34.

7. Aloia TA, Knight R, Gaber AO, Ghobrial RM, Goss JA. Analysis of liver transplant outcomes for United Network for Organ Sharing recipients 60 years old or older identifies multiple model for end-stage liver disease-independent prognostic factors. Liver Transpl 2010; 16(8): 950-9.

8. Washburn WK, Pollock BH, Nichols L, Speeg KV, Halff G. Impact of recipient MELD score on resource utilization. Am J Transplant 2006; 6(10): 2449-54.