medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Farmacia

ISSN 1561-2988 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Farm 2015; 49 (1)

Evaluation of the environmental microbiological burden in vaccine production and control areas

Bottale AJ, Riera LM, Rabinovitch L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 47-60
PDF size: 354.38 Kb.


Key words:

environmental microbiological monitoring, disinfectant efficacy, quality assurance, vaccine production.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: the objective of this study was to support microbiological quality assurance in a vaccine production plant through identification of environmental microbiological charge and its behavior with routine disinfectants.
Methods: the existing flora of each classified area was studied. Air samples taken by volumetric and plate sedimentation methods were analyzed. Surfaces and the gown of the staff were assessed by contact method. Genera and species were identified, thus setting a Group of Indicator Microorganisms made up of microorganisms that were isolated at a rate greater than 5% for each facility.
Results: animal Facility: Staphylococcus spp (50 %), Aerococcus spp (21%), Micrococcus spp (10%), Bacillus spp and related genera (6%); Normal Tissue Culture Laboratory: Staphylococcus spp (48%), Micrococcus spp (34%), Bacillus spp and related genera (13%); Quality Control Laboratory: Staphylococcus spp (50%), Micrococcus spp (27%), Kocuria spp (9%), Bacillus spp and related genera (7%); Production: Staphylococcus spp (50%), Micrococcus spp (17%), Kocuria spp (11%), Leuconostoc spp (8 %), Bacillus spp and related genera (6%). The Group of Indicator Microorganisms for the Production Unit was identified as Staphylococcus spp (49.5%), Micrococcus spp (23 %) and Bacillus spp and related genera (8.1%). The regularly used disinfectants for strains from the Group of Indicator Microorganisms showed a high microbicidal efficacy.
Conclusion: the results provide information about the environmental bioburden, which will be useful for the understanding of the microbial entry points and spreading and the implementation of measures to prevent microbial contamination, so critical for manufacture of safe, pure and effective vaccines.


REFERENCES

  1. Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica. Ministerio de Salud. Argentina. Lineamientos generales de Buenas Prácticas de Fabricación para Elaboradores, Importadores/Exportadores de Medicamentos. Disposición N° 2819/04;2004.

  2. FDA, Guidance for Industry. Sterile Drug Produced by Aseptic Processing – Current Good Manufacturing Practice, US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Regulatory Affaire; 2004.

  3. EMA. Guide To Good Manufacturing Practice, Revision To Annex 1. European Agency of Medications. European Union; 2003.

  4. The International Organization for Standardization. Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments. Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness. International Standard ISO 14644-1:1999(E).

  5. World Health Organization. Environmental Monitoring of Clean Rooms in Vaccine Manufacturing Facilities. Geneve: 3rd Draft; 2010.

  6. United States Pharmacopeia. Evaluación microbiológica de cuartos limpios y otros ambientes controlados. Compendios de Normas Oficiales. Ed. N°33; 2010.

  7. The International Organization for Standardization. Cleanrooms asassociated controlled environments-Biocontamination control Part 1: General principles and methods. International Standard 1st Ed. ISO 14698-1:2003(E).

  8. The International Organization for Standardization. Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments - Biocontamination control. Part 2: Evaluation and interpretation of biocontamination. Technical Corrigendum 1. International Standard ISO 14698-2:2003/Cor.1:2004(E).

  9. Sutton S. Qualification of an Environmental Monitoring Program-1. Selection/Justification of Sample Sites. Pharm Microbiol Forum (PMF) Newsletter. 2008; 14(8):2-8.

  10. Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B. Predicted Contamination Levels in Cleanrooms When Cleanroom-Dressed People Are the Contamination Source . Pharm Technol; 2006.[cited 2014 feb 08] Disponible en: http://pharmtech.findpharma.com/pharmtech/Aseptic+processing/Predicted- Contamination-Levels-incleanroomsWhenCl/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/322983

  11. Ljungqvist B, Reinmüller B. Aseptic Production, Gowning Systems and Airborne Contaminants. Pharm Techno (suppl); 2005[cited 2014 oct 09] Disponible en: http://pharmtech.findpharma.com/pharmtech/data/articlestandard//pharmtech/20 2005/160408/article.pdf

  12. Whyte W, Hejab M. Particle and microbial airborne dispersion from people. Euro J Parenteral & Pharm Sci; 2007;12(2):8.

  13. Jiménez L. Microbial diversity in pharmaceutical product recalls and environments. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol [Review]. 2007;61(5):17.

  14. AENOR. Asociacion Española de Normalización y Certificación. Antisépticos y desinfectantes químicos. Ensayo cuantitativo de suspensión para la evaluación de la actividad bactericida básica de los antisépticos y desinfectantes químicos. Método de ensayo y requisitos. Norma española UNE-EN 1040:2006.

  15. Rutala W. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Antisepsis - Principles and Practices. In: Healthcare Facilities. Washington DC; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc; 2001; 233 pp.

  16. Farmacopea Argentina. Buenas prácticas de fabricación para elaboradores, importadores / exportadores de medicamentos. Anexo 1-elaboración de medicamentos estériles. Séptima edición, Volumen 1; 2003.

  17. Whyte W. Collection efficiency of microbial methods used to monitor cleanrooms. Euro J Parenteral & Pharm Sci. 2005;10(2):5.

  18. Ahmed I, Yokota A, Yamazoe A, Fujiwara T. Proposal of Lysinibacillus boronitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., and transfer of Bacillus fusiformis to Lysinibacillus fusiformis comb. nov. and Bacillus sphaericus to Lysinibacillus sphaericus comb. nov. Internat J. Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57: 1117-1125.

  19. Gordon RE, Haynes WC, Pang CHN. The Genus Bacillus. U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C., Agriculture Handbook # 427; 1973.

  20. Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. Endospore-forming Gram-positive Rods and Cocci. In Claus, D Berkeley, R.C. W. (org). Bergey´s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1986; cap 13:1104-1139.

  21. Agostini-Utescher CL, Franzolin MR, Trabulsi LR (in memoriam), Gambale V. Microbiological Monitoring of Clean Rooms in Development of Vaccines. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38:710-716.

  22. Glasel J. The All-important Fine Details Underlying an Effective Cleaning and Disinfection Program. Pharm Microbiol Forum (PMF) Newsletter. 2009;15(7):2-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Farm. 2015;49