medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2016; 39 (1)

Relación entre supervisión parental y conducta antisocial en menores infractores del Estado de Morelos

Carrillo AL, Juárez GF, González-Forteza C, Martínez VNA, Medina-Mora IME
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 11-17
PDF size: 196.07 Kb.


Key words:

Anti-social behavior, juvenile offenders, familiar environment, parental monitoring, state of Morelos.

ABSTRACT

Introduction Parental supervision is constituted by a series of correlated parental behaviors involving children care, knowing their where abouts, which activities they are performing, and the situation of their adaptive processes. In order for parental supervision to take place, it is necessary that communication and mutual support exist between mother and father, as well as between parents and children so that the family environment becomes pleasant. Supervision is one of the most studied factors related to anti-social behavior, and it has been observed that its absence or inconsistency allows for the occurrence of anti-social behavior, which in the more serious cases leads to delinquency.
Objective To know the relationship between family environment, supervision and the seriousness of anti-social behavior in juvenile offenders confined in a state penitentiary from Morelos.
Method A survey was used to collect data from a population of 86 juvenile male offenders from a state penitentiary located in Morelos.
Results Parent-children communication and support are interrelated and form the familiar environment. Thus, children’s communication predicts proper supervision and monitoring, specifically in the area of knowing children’s activities, which, at the same time, predict less serious anti-social behavior.
Discussion and conclusion It is important that families have an environment based on communication and support. It is also relevant to encourage adolescents to freely communicate with their parents so supervision and monitoring become common elements that help adolescents to stay away from behaviors that could lead them to crime.


REFERENCES

  1. Consejo de Menores. Memoria 1996-mayo 1997. México: Secretaría de Gobernación; 1997.

  2. Consejo de Menores: Memoria 1996-1999. México: Secretaría de Gobernación; 2000.

  3. Juárez F, Villatoro J, Gutiérrez ML, Fleiz C et al. Tendencias de la conducta antisocial en estudiantes del Distrito Federal: Mediciones 1997- 2003. Salud Ment 2005;28(3):60-68.

  4. Secretaría de Seguridad Pública. Consejo de Menores, 2003. Sitio Internet http://www.ssp.gob.mx/application?pageid=cmenores_sub_ 2&docId=838 Fecha de último acceso: 25/07/2005.

  5. CUEVAS E: Se incrementa número de los menores infractores. Jornada Morelos, 5 de julio; 2005.

  6. Kazdin A. Tratamiento de la conducta antisocial en la infancia y la adolescencia. Barcelona, España: Martínez-Roca; 1988.

  7. Alcántara E: Menores con conducta antisocial. México. Porrúa-Universidad Anáhuac; 2001.

  8. Craig G, Baucom D. Desarrollo psicológico. México. Pearson; 2001.

  9. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Ley para el Tratamiento de Menores Infractores para el Distrito Federal en Materia Común y para Toda la República en Materia Federal, 1991, feb. En: InfoJus, sistema de consulta del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Legislación Federal (vigente al 3/02/2015). Sitio internet: http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/ijure/tcfed/186.htm?s= Fecha de último acceso: 5/02/2015.

  10. Juárez F. Predictores de la conducta antisocial y su relación con el uso de drogas en una muestra nacional de estudiantes de enseñanza media y media superior. Tesis de licenciatura. México: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; 1999.

  11. De la Garza F, De la Vega B, Zúñiga V, Villarreal R. La cultura del menor infractor. México: Trillas; 1987.

  12. Stattin H, Kerr M. Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development 2000;71(4):1072-1085.

  13. Dishion T, McMahon R. Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child Family Psychology Review 1998;1(1):61- 75.

  14. Patterson G, Stouthamer-Loeber M. The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development 1984;55(4):1299- 1307.

  15. Barnes G, Farrell M. Parental support and control as predictors of adolescent drinking, delinquency, and related problem behaviors. J Marriage Family 1992;54:763-776.

  16. Villalobos M. La relación familiar, algunos de sus efectos perturbadores en la organización del sujeto. Cuadernos Psicología-Colombia 1994;13(2):7-24.

  17. Medina V (ed.). La comunicación entre padres e hijos. En: Guía Infantil. com, (s/f), revista en línea: http://www.guiainfantil.com/educacion/ familia/comfamilia.htm. Fecha de último acceso: 5/02/2015

  18. Juárez F, Medina-Mora ME, Berenzon S, Villatoro J et al. Antisocial behavior: Its relation to selected sociodemographic variables and alcohol and drug use among mexican students. Substance Use Misuse 1998;33(7):1437-1459.

  19. Villatoro J, Andrade-Palos P, Fleiz C, Medina-Mora ME et al. La relación padres-hijos: una escala para evaluar el ambiente familiar en adolescentes. Salud Ment 1997;20(2):21-27.

  20. Edwards AL. Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. Nueva York:, Appleton Century Crofts; 1957.

  21. IBM SPSS Statistics versión 20 [Software de computadora]. New York: IBM Corporation, SPSS Inc.; 2010.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2016;39