medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Interna de México

Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Med Int Mex 2016; 32 (1)

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as predictor of severity and mortality in patients with abdominal sepsis

Reyes-Gálvez JA, Gracida- Mancilla NI, Enríquez-Santos D, Carrillo-Esper R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 41-47
PDF size: 783.49 Kb.


Key words:

sepsis, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, APACHE II.

ABSTRACT

Background: Abdominal sepsis is a clinical entity that is on the increase and its mortality depends mainly on clinical evaluation, timely diagnosis and an early treatment. Currently, there are different ways of measuring the severity and mortality of sepsis, especially with biomarkers and scales; however, the scales, laboratories and biomarkers are not available in many health centers in our country because especially of the high cost. Therefore, it is necessary to search for easy, quick and low-cost methods to measure severity and mortality of this entity.
Objective: To assess if neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is an adequate marker of prognosis and severity in sepsis.
Material and Method: A retrospective, observational, correlational, analytical study was conducted with patients of the Integral Attention of the Abdominal Sepsis Clinic (IAASC) of the Hospital General de Mexico, from July 2013 to July 2014, with diagnosis of abdominal sepsis and submitted to surgery for correction of the abdominal infectious focus. APACHE II scale and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were applied at entering to the Emergency Room, as well as the discharge state as alive or dead. APACHE II scale was considered to divide the cases in slight (less than 14) and severe (higher than 15).
Results: There were included 193 cases. The finding of the adjusted analysis was that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a diagnostic test with low correlation to the severity of abdominal sepsis having an area under the curve of 0.660, with sensitivity of 44% and specificity of 79% and for mortality has an area under the curve of 0.702, and sensitivity of 45% and specificity of 77% having both a breakpoint of 18 (p ‹0.05).
Conclusion: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a low global statistical power test with low sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the severity and mortality of patients with abdominal sepsis.


REFERENCES

  1. Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41:580-637.

  2. Ortiz Leyba C, Garnacho Montero J. Conocimientos actuales en la fisiopatología de la sepsis. Med Intensiva 2005;29:135-141.

  3. Aziz M, Jacob A, Yang WL, Matsuda A, Wang P. Current trends in inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators in sepsis. J Leukoc Biol 2013;93:329-342.

  4. Carrillo-Esper R, Carrillo-Cordova JR, Carrillo-Cordova L. Estudio epidemiológico de la sepsis en unidades de Terapia Intensiva mexicanas. Cir Cir 2009;77:301-308.

  5. Mikkelsen ME, et al. Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1670-1677.

  6. Rangel FS. Epidemiología de la sepsis bacteriana. Enf Infec Microbiol 1999;19:173-180.

  7. Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill. Critical Care 2010;14:207.

  8. Mata Vicente JF. Escalas pronósticas en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int 2012;26:234-241.

  9. Samraj RS, Zingarelli B, Wong HR. Role of biomarkers in sepsis care. Shock 2013;40:358-365.

  10. Zahorec R. Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts–rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy 2001;102:5-14.

  11. Chávez Pérez JP. Sepsis abdominal. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int 2002;16:124-135.

  12. Rodea RH. Guía clínica para la atención del paciente con sepsis abdominal en el servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital General de México. Documento interno, 2002.

  13. Pulido CA. Tratamiento médico en sepsis abdominal. Cir Gen 2011;33:23-24.

  14. Sartelli, et al. Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2014;9:22.

  15. Hecker A, Uhle F, Schwandner T, Padberg W, Weigand MA. Diagnostics, therapy and outcome prediction in abdominal sepsis: current standards and future perspectives. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014;399:11-22.

  16. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Norrby-Teglund A, Mylona V, et al. Risk assessment in sepsis: a new prognostication rule by APACHE II score and serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor. Crit Care 2012;16:149.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Int Mex. 2016;32