medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas

ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2015; 34 (4)

Effect of a selective nutrient combination of chromogenic substrates for diagnosis of grampositive cocci

Someillan ID, Zhurbenko R, Rodríguez MC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 313-327
PDF size: 247.14 Kb.


Key words:

chromogenic composition, grampositive microorganisms, nutrient bases, selective inhibitors.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: reemergence of Grampositive bacteria infections and the rise of their pathogenicity require a quick and accurate microbiological diagnosis. BioCen has developed a chromogenic composition for isolation, culturing and rapid and presumptive differentiation of gram-positive microorganisms through specific chromogenic reactions in which the inhibition of gramnegative bacteria is partial or total.
Objective: to evaluate the effect of a combination of nutrient bases, selective inhibitors and chromogenic substrates to increase the selectivity and differential capacity to detect Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus species of clinical importance.
Methods: twenty one microbial strains from the American Type Culture Collection and 24 clinical isolates of Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus and of other gramnegative microorganisms were evaluated. Various combinations of nutrient bases, thallium acetate, nalidixic acid and chromogenic substrates were also assessed for the promotion, growth and differentiation of grampositive bacteria. The microbiological functionality was evaluated whereas the diagnostic quality parameters were determined.
Results: the combination of nutrient bases allowed the development of grampositive microorganisms in 24 hours and their differentiation through specific chromogenic reactions. The growth of gramnegative microorganisms was inhibited by the thallium acetate (0.014 g·L-1) and nalidixic acid (0,008 g·L-1) except for Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa whose morphological characteristics do not interfere with differentiation of target microorganisms. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosis were 100%.
Conclusions: the combination of nutrient bases, selective inhibitors and chromogenic substrates allowed the development and differentiation of the evaluated microorganism species. The inoculation of target and non-target microorganisms in the chromogenic medium and the differentiation of those strains where a similar color of the colonies was detected by means of supplementary rapid tests provided the medium with high diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.


REFERENCES

  1. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: Executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):285-92.

  2. Arias CA, Murray BE. The rise of Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(4):266-78.

  3. Fariña N, Carpinelli L, Samudio M, Guillén R, Laspina F, Sanabria R, et al. Staphylococcus coagulasa-negativa clínicamente significativos. Especies más frecuentes y factores de virulencia. Rev Chil Infectol. 2013;30(5):480-8.

  4. Parks T, Barrett L, Jones N. Invasive streptococcal disease: a review for clinicians. British Medical Bulletin. 2015 [citado 10 Jun 2015]; p. 1-13. Disponible en: http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/

  5. Cantón R, Ruiz-Garbajosa P. Infecciones causadas por bacterias grampositivas multiresistentes (Staphylococcus aureus y Enterococcus spp.). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2013;31(8):543-51.

  6. Pérez Montoya LH, Zurita Villarroel IM, Pérez Rojas N, Patiño Cabrera N, Calvimonte OR. Infecciones Intrahospitalarias: Agentes, manejo actual y prevención. Rev Cient Cienc Méd. 2010;13(2):94-8.

  7. Zhang R, Wang F, Kang J, Wang X, Yin D, Dang W, et al. Prevalence of multidrug resistant Gram-positive cocci in a Chinese hospital over an 8-year period. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(6):9462-9.

  8. Hughes GJ, van Hoek AJ, Sriskandan S, Lamagni TL. The costs of invasive group A streptococcal infections in England. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1719-30.

  9. Huttner A, Harbarth S, Carlet J, Cosgrove S, Goossens H, Holmes A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: a global view from the 2013 World Healthcare-Associated Infections Forum. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2013 [citado 7 May 2015];2(1):31. Disponible en: http://www.aricjournal.com/content/2/1/31

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. CDC Atlanta (EE. UU.): GA; 2013.

  11. Pujol M, Limón E. Epidemiología general de las infecciones nosocomiales. Sistemas y programas de vigilancia. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2013;31(2):108-13.

  12. Reglinski M, Sriskandan S. The contribution of group A streptococcal virulence determinants to the pathogenesis of sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5(1):127-36.

  13. Khan HA, Ahmad A, Mehboob R. Nosocomial infections and their control strategies. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2015;5(7):509-14.

  14. Díaz Pérez M, Zhurbenko R, Fuentes Bárcenas M, Hernández Cortez C, Castro- Escarpulli G, Rodríguez Martínez C, et al. Evaluation of an alternative chromogenic method for the detection and enumeration of enterococci in waters. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8(7):652-8.

  15. Manafi M, Kneifel W, Bascomb S. Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates used in bacterial diagnostics. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55(3):335-48.

  16. Orenga S, James AL, Manafi M, Perry JD, Pincus DH. Enzymatic substrates in microbiology. J Microbiol Meth. 2009;79(2):139-55.

  17. Durán Vila A, Rodríguez Martínez C. Inventors; National Center of Biological products, assignee. Selective culture medium for the isolation and/or detection of species in the Streptococcus genus. EP patent 1 600 514 B1. 2011 Ago 31.

  18. Sigma A. Biochemicals and Reagents for like Science Research. St. Louis (EE. UU.): Sigma-Aldrich; 2000.

  19. ISO 13843 (2000). Water quality – Guidance on validation of microbiological methods, ISO/TR 13843. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standarization; 2000.

  20. Reuter G. Selective media for group D-Streptococci. Int J Food Microbiol. 1985;2(1-2):103-14.

  21. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC Jr. Color atlas and textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5th ed. New York, Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1997.

  22. Díaz Pérez M, Rodríguez Martínez C, Zhurbenko R. Enterococcus, medios de cultivo convencionales y cromogénicos. Rev Cubana Hig Epidemiol. 2013;51(1):97-110.

  23. Rodríguez JJ, Altamirano MA. Genetic toxicology of thallium: a review. Drug Chem Toxicol 2013;36:369-83.

  24. Konguchi K, EDE K-I, Sagara Y, Nakamura M. Effect of thallium acetate on the growth of bacteria. Kurume Med J 1969;16(3):163-8.

  25. Calvo J, Martínez-Martínez L. Mecanismos de acción de los antimicrobianos. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2009;27(1):44-52.

  26. Power DA, McCuen PJ. Manual of BBL Products and Laboratory Procedures. 6th ed. Cockeysville, MD: Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems; 1988.

  27. Gobbetti M, Calasso M. Streptococcus. En Batt CA, Tortolello ML (Ed). Encyclopedia of food microbiology. 2nd ed. Elsevier Ltd. 2014;3:535-54.

  28. Hongfei Z, Fengling B, Fang Z, Walczak P, Xiangning J, Bolin Z, et al. Characterization of soybean protein hydrolysates able to promote the proliferation of Streptococcus thermophilus ST. J Food Sci. 2013;78(4):575-81.

  29. Zhurbenko R, Rodríguez Martínez C, Díaz Pérez M, Durán Vila A, López Hernández OD, Viera Oramas DR, et al. Caracterización de la peptona de soya para el cultivo de microorganismos. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2006;58(2):109-18.

  30. Zhurbenko R, Rodríguez Martínez C. Bases nutritivas para el cultivo de los microorganismos: Parte 1. Procesos tecnológicos. Salud (i) Ciencia. 2008;16(4):420-5.

  31. Osmanov SK. Poluchenie I experimentalnoie izuchenie pitatielnikj sried s gidrlizatami krovi zhivtnikj dlia mikrobiologicheskoi diagnostiki streptkokkovikj infektsii (Tesis doctoral). Moskva: MNIIVSIIIM; 1983.

  32. Meli F, Lazzi C, Neviani E, Gatti M. Effect of protein hydrolysates on growth kinetics and aminopeptidase activities of Lactobacillus. Curr Microbiol. 2014;68:82-7.

  33. Tsoraeva A, Zhurbenko R. Development and Characterization of a Mixed Nutrient Base for the Culture of a Wide Range of Microorganisms. Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 2000;42:155-61.

  34. MacFaddin JF. Pruebas Bioquímicas para la identificación de Bacterias de importancia clínica.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd. 2015;34