medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas

ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2015; 34 (4)

Composition of urolithiasis in Cuban patients by sex

Bacallao MRA, Mañalich CR, Gutiérrez GF, Badell MA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 328-336
PDF size: 140.47 Kb.


Key words:

urolithiasis, lithiasis composition, infrared spectroscopy, urinary stones.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: urolithiasis imply significant morbidity and economic costs. For its management, it is fundamental to make clinical and lab evaluation including the study of the chemical composition.
Objective: to determine the frequency of occurrence of several types of urolithiasis according to their composition and relationship with the individual’s sex.
Methods: descriptive and cross-sectional study that included urolithiasis of Cuban adults sent to the Renal Physiopathology Lab of the Institute of Nephrology for the study of chemical composition in the 2001-2011 period. A Philips PU9516 infrared spectroscope served to analyze lithiasis. The various compounds were identified by comparing them with the reference spectra. All the data were collected and processed with SPSS 15.0; the frequency distribution analysis. Independence test and Fisher’s exact test were used to confirm the differences between sexes in terms of type of lithiasis.
Results: of 1815 analyzed lithiasis, 1316 (71.1 %) were simple. Simple calcium oxalate lithiasis represented 46.8 % of the total number. In the combinations, the most frequent were calcium oxalate plus calcium phosphate (24.7 %). The frequency of calcium oxalate and uric acid lithiasis was higher in men (p= 0.00 and those of calcium phosphate and struvite (p= 0.00) in women.
Conclusions: calcium stones, mainly monohydrated calcium oxalate, are the most common in the studied lithiatic population. Calcium oxalate and uric acid are the commonest in men whereas struvite and calcium phosphate are more frequent in women.


REFERENCES

  1. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817-23.

  2. Bushinsky DA, Coe FL, Moe OW. Nephrolithiasis. En: Taal MW, Chertow GM, Marsden PA, Skorecki K, Yu ASL, Brenner BM, Editores. The Kidney. 9 ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences. 2011. p. 1455-507.

  3. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR. Urologic Diseases in America Project: Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int. 2005;68:1808-14.

  4. Lotan Y. Economics and cost of care of stone disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009;16:5-10.

  5. Labrada MV, Larrea E, Castillo M, Borrero L, Valdéz A, Portal J, et al. Resultados de la litotricia extracorpórea utilizando el litotritor MODULITH SLX-MX (STORZ) para el tratamiento de la litiasis ureteral. Rev Cubana Cir. 2010 Sep [citado 7 May 2014];49(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034- 74932010000300002&lng=es

  6. Knoll T, Schubert AB, Fahlenkamp D, Leusmann DB, Wendt-Nordahl G, Schubert G, et al. Urolithiasis through the ages: data on more than 200,000 urinary stone analyses. J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1304-11.

  7. Costa-Bauzá A, Ramis M, Montesinos V, Grases F, Conte A, Pizá P, et al. Type of renal calculi: variation with age and sex. World J Urol. 2007 Aug;25(4):415-21.

  8. Alaya A, Nouri A, Belgith M, Saad H, Jouini R, Fadhel-Najjar M, et al. Changes in Urinary Stone Composition in the Tunisian Population: A retrospective study of 1,301 Cases. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32:177-83.

  9. Bastian PJ, Lörken M, Euler H, Lümmen G, Bastian HP. Results of the evaluation of 85,337 urinary stone analyses. Aktuelle Urol. 2008 Jul;39(4):298-304.

  10. Zaidman JL, Pinto N. Studies on urolithiasis in Israel. J Urol. 1976 Jun;115(6):626-7.

  11. Usman KD, Golan S, Abdin T, Livne PM, Pode D, Duvdevani M, et al. Urinary stone composition in Israel: current status and variation with age and sex-a bicenter study. J Endourol. 2013 Dec;27(12):1539-42.

  12. Najeeb Q, Masood I, Bhaskar N, Kaur H, Singh J, Pandey R, et al. Effect of BMI and Urinary pH on Urolithiasis and Its Composition. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2013;24(1):60-66.

  13. Ansari MS, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, Aron M, et al. Spectrum of stone composition: structural analysis of 1050 upper urinary tract calculi from northern India. Int J Urol. 2005 Jan;12(1):12-6.

  14. Dardamanis M. Pathomechanisms of nephrolithiasis. Hippokratia. 2013 Apr;17(2):100-07.

  15. Basiri A, Taheri M, Taheri F. What is the state of the stone analysis techniques in urolithiasis? Urol J. 2012;9(2):445-54.

  16. Wagner CA, Mohebbi N. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol. 2010 Nov- Dec;23 (Suppl 16):S165-9.

  17. Hernández T, Mañalich R, Reyes L, Fraxedas R. ¿Difiere la proporción de los componentes químicos del cálculo renal de los países euroasiáticos a la de un país tropical? Nefrología. 1993;23(6):593-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd. 2015;34