medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2016; 58 (3)

Bias correction of nutritional status estimates when reported age is used for calculating WHO indicators in children under five years of age

Quezada AD, García-Guerra A, Escobar L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 18
Page: 351-357
PDF size: 241.99 Kb.


Key words:

nutritional status, bias, data quality, age distribution, child, preschool.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess the performance of a simple correction method for nutritional status estimates in children under five years of age when exact age is not available from the data. Materials and methods. The proposed method was based on the assumption of symmetry of age distributions within a given month of age and validated in a large population-based survey sample of Mexican preschool children. Results. The main distributional assumption was consistent with the data. All prevalence estimates derived from the correction method showed no statistically significant bias. In contrast, failing to correct attained age resulted in an underestimation of stunting in general and an overestimation of overweight or obesity among the youngest. Conclusions. The proposed method performed remarkably well in terms of bias correction of estimates and could be easily applied in situations in which either birth or interview dates are not available from the data.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/ Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development. Geneva: WHO, 2006.

  2. Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition Software. Department of Nutrition for Health and Development World Health Organization. [Accessed 27 September 2013]. Available in: http://www.who.int/ childgrowth/software/en/

  3. Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 2007;369(9555):60-70. http://doi.org/dgqcr6

  4. Gorstein J. Assessment of nutritional status: effects of different methods to determine age on the classification of undernutrition. Bulletin of the World Helath Organization 1989;67(2):143-150.

  5. WHO Expert Committee. Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry: report of a WHO expert committee (WHO Technical Report Series; 854) Geneva. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 1995;854:1-452.

  6. Olaiz-Fernández G, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Rojas R, Villalpando-Hernández S, Hernández-Ávila M, Sepúlveda-Amor J. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2006. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2006.

  7. Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical Inference, 2nd ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press, 2002: 626.

  8. Wright CM, Parkinson KN. Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is “normal” and do growth charts allow for it? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F254–F257. http://doi.org/c2bggm

  9. Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernández S, Rivera-Dommarco, JA. Resultados de Nutrición de la ENSANUT 2006. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2007.

  10. O’Donnel O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data. Washington: The World Bank, 2008:46.

  11. De Onis M, Lobstein T. Defining obesity risk status in the general childhood population: which cut-offs should we use? Int J Peduatr Obes 2012; 5(6): 458-460. http://doi.org/c4ph35

  12. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall /CRC, 2004.

  13. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, et al. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet 2013;382(9890):452- 477. http://doi.org/f2mhzb

  14. Lohr SL. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Pacific Grove: Duxbury press, 1999:290-293.

  15. De Onis M, Onyango A, Borghi E, Siyam A, Blössner M, Lutter C. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Worldwide implementation of the WHO Child Growth Standards. Public Health Nutr 2012;15(9):1603-1610. http://doi.org/bdvt

  16. Oshaug A, Pedersen J, Diarra M, Bendech MA, Hatløy A. Problems and pitfalls in the use of estimated age in anthropometric measurements of children from 6 to 60 months of age: A case from Mali. J Nutr 1994; 124:636-644.

  17. Cuevas-Naou L, Rivera-Dommarco JA, Shamah-Levy T, Mundo-Rosas V, Méndez-Gómez Humarán I. Inseguridad alimentaria y estado de nutrición en menores de cinco años de edad en México. Salud Publica Mex 2014;56 supl 1:S47-S53.

  18. Ayala-Gaytán EA, Díaz Durán-Hernández A. Infraestructura, ingreso y desnutrición infantil en México. Salud Publica Mex 2015;57:22-28.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2016;58