medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2016; 14 (2)

Randomized clinical trial about the use of self-adhesive mesh against the use of fixed polypropylene mesh to repair inguinal hernia

Sánchez ARA, Hernández AS, Flores OMO, López IR, Rendón MME
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 77-83
PDF size: 164.20 Kb.


Key words:

Inguinal hernia, hernioplasty, self-gripping mesh, postoperative pain.

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of self-gripping mesh has reduced surgical time in inguinal plasty without increasing complications compared to repairs with sutured mesh. However, there is controversy as to whether this reduction and non-use of sutures for fixation impact on the presence and severity of postoperative pain. Objective: Determine whether the use of self-gripping mesh (SGM) reduces the presence and intensity of postoperative pain as opposed to sutured mesh (SM). Material and methods: Single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial in parallel groups: SGM versus SM with the Lichtenstein technique. The application and surgical time was evaluated, as it was: the pain at 24 h, 72 h, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and one year by visual analog scale. Major complications were analyzed. Results: There was less intense pain at 24 h and 72 h (p = 0.012 and p = 0.018). The SGM required less application time (72.4 ± 10 s versus 375.5 ± 38 s, p ‹ 0.0001) and surgical time (24.6 ± 2.5 m versus 40.2 ± 4.9 m, p ‹ 0.0001). The main complications were seroma, testicular edema, and one relapse. Conclusion: The self-gripping mesh could reduce mediate postoperative pain as a consequence of less trauma to tissues due to the non-use of sutures.


REFERENCES

  1. Mayagoitia GJ. Hernias de la pared abdominal: tratamiento actual. 2a edición. México, D.F.: Alfil S.A. de C.V.; 2009.

  2. Bekker J, Keeman JN, Simons MP, Aufenacker TJ. A brief history of the inguinal hernia operation in adults. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007; 151 (16): 924-931.

  3. Amid PK. Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia. 2004; 8 (1): 1-7.

  4. Canonico S, Benevento R, Perna G, Guerniero R, Sciaudone G, Pellino G et al. Sutureless fixation with fibrin glue of lightweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: effect on postoperative pain: a double-blind, randomized trial versus standard heavyweight mesh. Surgery. 2013; 153 (1): 126-130.

  5. Campanelli G, Canziani M, Frattini F, Cavalli M, Agrusti S. Inguinal hernia: state of the art. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2008; 6 Suppl 1: S26-S28.

  6. van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J. Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus non-mesh primary inguinal hernia repair: long-term chronic pain at 10 years. Surgery. 2007; 142 (5): 695-698.

  7. Kalliomäki ML, Meyerson J, Gunnarsson U, Gordh T, Sandblom G. Long-term pain after inguinal hernia repair in a population-based cohort; risk factors and interference with daily activities. Eur J Pain Lond Engl. 2008; 12 (2): 214-225.

  8. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2007; 194 (3): 394-400.

  9. Jeroukhimov I, Wiser I, Karasic E, Nesterenko V, Poluksht N, Lavy R et al. Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218 (1): 102-107.

  10. Fang Z, Zhou J, Ren F, Liu D. Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014; 207 (5): 773-781.

  11. Bruna-Esteban M, Cantos-Pallarés M, Artigues-Sánchez De Rojas E. Use of adhesive mesh in hernioplasty compared to the conventional technique. Results of a randomised prospective study. Cir Esp. 2010; 88 (4): 253-258.

  12. Zhang C, Li F, Zhang H, Zhong W, Shi D, Zhao Y. Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. J Surg Res. 2013; 185 (2): 653-660.

  13. Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I, Joachim A, Sandberg S, Koch T et al. Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208 (6): 1107-1114.

  14. Pandanaboyana S, Mittapalli D, Rao A, Prasad R, Ahmad N. Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon. 2014; 12 (2): 87-93.

  15. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open procedure in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of the results. Am J Surg. 2014; 207 (4): 602-612.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2016;14