medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2002; 3 (1)

Simulator for training elementary technical abilities in laparoscopic surgery. A simple, useful and low cost model

Soto GM, Valencia RJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 25-27
PDF size: 86.82 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic surgery, simulator, training.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To present a simple, useful and low cost model of simulator for training elementary technical abilities in laparoscopic surgery. Setting: Hospital Militar Regional, Acapulco, Gro: Second Level Health Care Regional Hospital. Material and methods: It is made a simulator with a newborn cradle, a surgical cloth, adhesive tape and a just sacrificed chicken. The simulator it is used in the training for the residents, boarding and medicine students to acquire the dominion on the basic procedures in laparoscopic surgery. Results: The simulator is assembled easy and quickly, is useful and it’s extremely cheap. Conclusion: The described model is a practical and economic alternative to acquire and conserve abilities in laparoscopic surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Azcoitia MF, Farías SJA. Experiencia de enseñanza-aprendizaje de cirugía laparoscópica en estudiantes de medicina de pregrado. Cir Gral 2001; 23: 139-44.

  2. Hinojosa PA, Salinas SE, Piza BR, Torres VJM, Soto GM, Dávila AFJ. Entrenamiento tutelar intensivo en colecistectomía laparoscópica en pacientes. Cir Gral 2000; 22: 334-36.

  3. Scott DJ, Valentine RJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Jones DB. Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examinations, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment. Surgery 2000; 128: 613-22.

  4. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Enhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191: 272-83.

  5. Nguyen NT, Mayer KL, Bold RJ, Larson M, Foster S Ho HS, Wolfe BM. laparoscopic suturing evaluation among surgical residents. J Surg Res 2000; 93: 133-6.

  6. Jackman SV, Jarzemski PA, Listopadzki PA, Lee BR, Stolanovici D, Demaree R, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. The EndoHand: comparison with standard laparoscopic instrumentation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999; 9: 253-8.

  7. Cundiff GW. Analysis of the effectiveness of an endoscopy education program in improving residents, laparoscopic skills. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 854-9.

  8. Sutton C, McCloy R, Middlebrook A, Chater P, Wilson M, Stone R, Mist VR. A laparoscopic surgery procedures trainer and evaluator. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997; 39: 598-607.

  9. McIntyre R, Driver CP, Miller SS. The anterior abdominal wall in laparoscopic procedures and limitations of laparoscopic simulators. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 411-3.

  10. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGulgan J, Crothers I, Browing J. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR). Endoscopy 1999; 31: 310-3.

  11. Szekely G, Brechbuhler C, Hutter R, Rhomberg A, Ironmonger N, Schmind P. Modelling of soft tissue deformation for laparoscopic surgery simulation. Med Image Anal 2000; 4: 57-66.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2002;3