medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2016; 17 (1)

Initial experience in minimally invasive robotic surgery in Third Level Hospital in Mexico

Ruiz SEJ, Ortiz WR, Rodríguez RG, Valadez CD, Blanco FJA, González SJR

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 29-33
PDF size: 154.32 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objectives: The use of Robotic Surgical Systems is an expanding technology in the world. Robot-assisted surgery overcomes some limitations of laparoscopy. Mexico joins this advantage in a Third Level Hospital in Zumpango. The present study describes our experience. Methods: From October 2013 to March 2015, 98 patients with different diseases underwent robotic surgery, the surgeries were performed for eight qualified surgeons. Surgical results were recorded in a database. Results: 98 patients underwent robotic surgery, 59% male and 41% female, mean age: 50.9 years. A total of 102 operations, 94 simples and 4 doubles procedures performed; Urological 46.9%, 41.8% general surgeries and 11.2% gynecological surgery. The most common surgery was prostatectomy (31.4%) The average operating time was 178 min. 13.28% rate of complications and one death. Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a reality in Mexico, the experience is limited but produced encouraging results, we find this practice safe and feasible, with acceptable surgical time, low conversion rates and low morbidity. This study is rewarding for its impact on our health care system but a major revision is important to improve our practice.


REFERENCES

  1. Valero R, Ko YH, Chauhan S, Schatloff O, Sivaraman A, Coelho FR et al. Cirugía robótica: Historia e impacto en la enseñanza. Actas Urol Esp. 2011; 35: 540-545.

  2. Yates DR, Rouprêt M, Bitker MO, Vaessen C. To infinity and beyond: the robotic toy story. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 263-265.

  3. Miller H. Cirugía robótica en México. Los sistemas inteligentes, perspectivas actuales y a futuro en el ámbito mundial. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2003; 4: 45-50.

  4. Carbajal A. Estado del arte en cirugía robótica. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2001; 2: 109-112.

  5. González RR, Ballí JJ, Rumbaut RD. Nuevas tecnologías en cirugía: cirugía robótica. Avances. 2007; 13: 41-50.

  6. Corona-Montes VE. La cirugía robótica como alternativa para el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata de bajo riesgo en México. Rev Mex Urol. 2013; 73: 221-222.

  7. Lucena OJR, Coronel P, Orellana PS. Historia, evolución, estado actual y futuro de la cirugía robótica. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina. 2007; 30: 109-114.

  8. Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hangen ME. Set-up and docking of the da Vinci surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot. 2010; 6: 57-60.

  9. Sait KH. Early experience with the da Vinci® surgical system robot in gynecological surgery at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Int J Womens Health. 2011; 3: 219-226.

  10. Talamini M, Campbell K, Standfield C. Robótic gastrointestinal surgery: early experience and system description. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002; 12: 225-232.

  11. Ortiz OE, Ramos CA, Moreno SJ, Pardo MC, Galante RI, Bullón SF et al. Multidisciplinary development of robotic surgery in University Tertiary Hospital: Organization and outcomes. Cir Esp. 2010; 87: 95-100.

  12. Uffort EE, Jensen JC. Side docking the robot for robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. JSLS. 2011; 15: 200-202.

  13. Chin JL, Luke PP, Pautler SE. Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007; 1: 97-101.

  14. Dogra PN, Javali TD, Singh P, Kumar R, Seth A, Gupta NP et al. Perioperative outcome of initial 190 cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. A single-center experience. Indian J Urol. 2012; 28: 159-163.

  15. Castillo OA, Lopez-Fontana G, Rodriguez-Carlin A, Landerer E, Vidal-Mora I, De Orúe-Rios M et al. Prostatectomía radical asistida por robot da Vinci: experiencia inicial en 50 casos consecutivos. Rev Chilena de Cirugía. 2011; 6: 609-616.

  16. Rojas I, Larrain de la CD, Morengo F, Gonzalez F, Padro J, Buckel H. Uso rutinario del montaje lateral (side-docking) en cirugía robótica ginecológica: estudio de factibilidad. Rev Chil Ostet Ginecol. 2012; 77: 428-433.

  17. Einarsson JI, Hibner M, Advincula AP. Side docking: an alternative docking method for gynecologic robotic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 4: 123-125.

  18. Tan SJ, Lin CK, Fu PT, Liu YL, Sun CC, Chang CC et al. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 51: 18-25.

  19. Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT. Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Initial experience at a single institution. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 24: 303-312.

  20. Yumioka T, Iwamoto H, Masago T, Morizane S, Yao A, Honda M et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in an initial Japanese series: The impact of prior abdominal surgery on surgical outcomes. Int J of Urol. 2015; 22: 278-282.

  21. Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 78-86.

  22. Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2014; 12: 1077-1811.

  23. Ramos AC, Domene CE, Volpe P, Pajecki D, D’Almeida AV, Ramos MG et al. Early outcomes of the first brazilian experience in totally robotic bariatric surgery. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013; 26: 2-7.

  24. Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F et al. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 117-119.

  25. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003; 138: 777-784.

  26. Abdalla EZ, Averbach M, Ribeiro-Junior U, Machado MA, Luca-Filho CR. Robotic abdominal surgery: a Brazilian initial experience. Arg Bras Cir Dig. 2013; 26: 190-194.

  27. Monzó JI, Garcia MF, Manzur E, Schell J, Finkelstein D, Albornoz M, Ortega R, Secin FP. Experiencia inicial en cirugía laparoscópica asistida por robot en un Servicio de Urología de un hospital público. Rev Arg de Urol. 2011; 72: 46-55.

  28. Velemir L, Azuar AS, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, Jardon K, Rabischong B, Pouly JL, Mage G. Optimizing the role of surgeon assistants during a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009; 37: 74-80.

  29. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006; 191: 555-560.

  30. Göcmen A, Sanlikan F, Ucar MG. Turkey’s experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 282: 163-171.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com