medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (3)

Bi-dimensional cephalometric prediction in orthognathic surgery

Pérez VJ

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 169-173
PDF size: 273.56 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Cephalometrics is a standardized universal method for the diagnosis, prediction and treatment planning of various facial deformities. The aim of this article is to propose a simplified bi-dimensional cephalometric study.


REFERENCES

  1. Ryan FS, Barnard M, Cunningham SJ. What are orthognathic patients’ expectations of treatment outcome-a qualitative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70 (11): 2648-2655.

  2. Chen B, Zhang ZK, Wang X. Factors influencing postoperative satisfaction of orthognathic surgery patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002; 17 (3): 217-222.

  3. Reineke P. Essentials of orthognathic surgery. Quintessence Publishing; 2003: pp. 15-65, 69-75.

  4. Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C, White RP Jr, Rogers L, Sarver DM. The accuracy of video imaging in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107 (2): 177-185.

  5. Cousley RR, Grant E. The accuracy of preoperative orthognathic predictions. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 42: 96-104.

  6. McNeil RW, Proffit WR, White RP. Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod. 1972; 42: 154-164.

  7. Jones RM, Khambay BS, McHugh S, Ayoub AF. The validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36 (10): 900-908.

  8. Abe N, Kuroda S, Furutani M, Tanaka E. Data-based prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery: clinical assessment of new simulation software. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44 (1): 90-96.

  9. Xia J, Samman N, Yeung RW, Shen SG, Wang D, Ip HH et al. Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000; 15 (4): 265-282.

  10. Farrel B, Franco B, Tucker R. Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014; 26: 459-473.

  11. Betts NJ, Dowd KF. Soft tissue changes associated with orthognathic surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 8: 13-38.

  12. Barbenel J, Paul E, Khambay B, Walker S, Moos F, Ayoub F. Errors in orthognathic surgery planning: the effect of inaccurate study model orientation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 1103-1108.

  13. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Lancellotti L, Sarti A. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 26-32.

  14. Nadjmi N, Mollemans W, Daelemans A, Van Hemelen G, Schutyser F, Bergé S. Virtual occlusion in planning orthognathic surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39 (5): 457-462.

  15. Kwon J, Choi W, Kyung M, Park H. Accuracy of maxillary repositioning in two-jaw surgery with conventional articulator model surgery versus virtual model surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 732-738.

  16. Khambay B, Ullah R. Current methods of assessing the accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue facial predictions: technical and clinical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44: 132-138.

  17. McCormick U, Drew J. Virtual model surgery for efficient planning and surgical performance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 638-644.

  18. Gossett C, Preston C, Dunford R, Lam-passo J. Prediction accuracy of computer- assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 609-617.

  19. Pospisil OA. Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987; 15 (2): 79-83.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com