medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica de Costa Rica y Centroamérica

Colegio de Medicos y Cirujanos República de Costa Rica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 620

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Cos Cen 2016; 73 (620)

¿Funciona la inseminación artificial hómologa como tratamiento de la infertilidad?

Rivera BC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 591-594
PDF size: 180.35 Kb.


Key words:

infertility, homologus artificial insemination.

ABSTRACT

Infertility is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), as a disease of the reproductive system that occurs at the inability to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of unprotected sex. Infertility problems in the country are serious, it is estimated that it is present on approximately 10% of all couples of reproductive age (15 to 49). Artificial insemination is the only treatment of infertility in Costa Rica. The study contemplate a population of all women aged 35 to 40, who were subjected to an homologus artificial insemination cycle, at the Center for Human Reproduction at the Adolfo Carit Eva Hospital back in 2013. The total population corresponds to 32 women patients, of which only 16%5 patients achieved pregnancy by artificial insemination. The incidence rate of pregnancies for 2013 in patients 35 to 40 years is 15.62%.


REFERENCES

  1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA,Nygren, KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22(6):1506-1512.

  2. Bongaarts J. A method for estimation of fecundability. Demography 1975;12:645-60.

  3. Cohlen, BJ. Should we continue performing intrauterine inseminations in the year 2004. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2005; 27(59):3-13.

  4. Custers IM, Steures P, Hompes P, Flierman P, van Kasteren Y, van Dop PA, van der Veen F, Mol BW. Intrauterine insemination: how many cycles should we perform? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:885-8.

  5. Eshre Capri Workshop Group. Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:295- 307.

  6. Eshre Capri Work shop Group. Intrauterine Insemination, Human Reproduction Update 2009; 1 (1): 1-13.

  7. Glosario de terminología en Técnicas de Reproducción Asistida (TRA). Versión revisada y preparada por el International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS)

  8. Gordon, J.D., J. Rydfors, M. Druzin, Y. Tadir, Y. El-Sayed, J. Chan, D. Lebovic, E. Langen y K. Fuh. 2007. Obstetrics, gynecology and infertility. 6ed. Scrub-Hill Press, Virginia, EEUU.

  9. Hughes 1998: Hughes EG, Collins JA, Gunby J. A randomized controlled trial of three low do se gonadotrophin protocols for un explained infertility. Human Reproduction 1998;13(6):1527-31.

  10. Jones Jr. HW, Cooke I, Kempers.R, Brinsden.P, Sounders.D. nternational Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010. Fertil and Steril 2010; 95 (2): 491.

  11. Levene MI, Wild J, Steer P. Higher multiple birth and the modern management of infertility in Britain. The British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;99(7):607-13.

  12. M. Diego, Diagnóstico de la infertilidad, estudio de la pareja infértil. Unidad de Medicina Reproductiva. Clínica de la Mujer, Viña del Mar. Rev. Med. Clin. Condes - 2010; 21(3) 363 – 367.

  13. Royere D. Intrauterine insemination: state of the art in humans. Gynécologie, obstétrique & fertilité 2004 Oct; 32 (10): 873-9. Sun W, Stegmann BJ, Henne M, Catherino WH and Segars JH. A new approach to ovarian reser.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Cos Cen. 2016;73