medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2002; 3 (4)

Evaluation of three surgical techniques for treatment of severe obesity

Álvarez CR, Aragón VE, Montoya RJ, Sandoval AO, Toledo DA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 149-154
PDF size: 54.88 Kb.


Key words:

Obesity, obesity surgery, gastric bypass, gastroplasty, gastric banding.

ABSTRACT

In order to compare the medium term result of three surgical techniques for severe obesity, 144 patients were evaluated, 52 underwent Fobi reinforced gastric bypass, 45 vertical silastic ring gastroplasty, and 47 laparoscopic gastric banding. All severely obese patients were studied thoroughly and followed for a period of four years. The results in excess weight loss were in average 72% for Fobi operation, 62% for gastroplasty and 68% for gastric banding. The body fat percent diminished from 58 to 35 with Fobi operation, from 59 to 42 with gastroplasty and from 60 to 34 with gastric banding. High blood pressure turned to normal in 14 out of 23 Fobi technique patients, in 11 out of 19 gastroplasties and 15 our of 29 gastric bands. Sleep apnea improved or disappeared in 4 out of 8 Fobi cases, in 3 out of 8 gastroplasties and 4 out of 11 cases of gastric banding. The use of insulin of hypoglycemic drugs was discontinued in 16 out of 31 patients: 8/13 Fobi’s, 4/9 gastroplasties and 4/9 bands. The Alvarez-Garcia Quality of Life test was done, and from 75 to 90% of the patients were satisfied with the operation, regardless the technique employed; only 10 out the 144 patients were not satisfied or disappointed. In summary, it seems that the three surgical techniques employed for severe obesity control have satisfactory results, with minimal differences among them.


REFERENCES

  1. 1. Obesity, Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic; Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneve, 2000: 39-68.

  2. 2. Herrera MF, Lozano RR, González BJ, Rull JA. Diseases and problems secondary to massive obesity In: Update Surgery for the morbidly obese patient. FD Communications Inc., 2000: 55-62.

  3. 3. IFSO Statement on Patient Selection for Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 1997; 7: 41.

  4. 4. Álvarez CR, García CA. Obesity surgery, a poly-parametric patient autoevaluation. Obes Surg 1991; 1: 445-7.

  5. 5. Cowan G. Bariatric surgeons, stereotypes and paradigms. Obes Surg 1992; 2: 7-12.

  6. 6. Hell E. IFSO and the Future of Surgery. Obes Surg 2000; 10: 495-97.

  7. 7. Mason EE. Vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Arch Surg 1982; 117: 701-6.

  8. 8. Brolin RE. Assimilation. Presidential Address, American Society for Bariatric Surgery, Washington, DC. Obes Surg 2001; 11: 665-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2002;3