medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Alimentación y Nutrición

ISSN 1561-2929 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

RCAN 2016; 26 (1)

Home nutrition support in the pediatric world. The Argentinian experience

Fain H
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 56
Page: 118-136
PDF size: 484.89 Kb.


Key words:

home nutritional support, pediatrics, Argentina, artificial nutrition.

ABSTRACT

Home nutrition support (HNS) has become an important resource for recovering the subject´s nutritional status outside the hospital environment. HNS theory and practice have successfully evolved in the comprehensive care of adults requiring food and nutritional care for extensive periods of time in order to sustain family, social, and labor rehabilitation and reinsertion. Technologies, systems and management programs have been developed for effective conduction of HNS schemes. HNS has been also extended to the pediatric area, and there is every day an increasingly growing number of children and adolescents being placed in HNS schemes for achieving the nutritional recovery goals. Argentina has been both a pioneer and a leader of HNS in the pediatric world. Conduction of HNS schemes in children and adolescents has been made possible thanks to the coordination of efforts made by medical care teams, hospital managements, health institutions, social funds and pensions, pharmaceutical enterprises, and even regional and province governments. Argentina has been also distinguished itself for an important normative activity aimed to regulate the different aspects of the useful and safe provision of food and nutritional care at the child | adolescent´s home. On the other hand, the Argentinian Association for Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (AANEP) has been at the forefront of the construction of alliances, drafting of guidelines, formation of specialists, and the assessment of the impact and effectiveness of HNS schemes. This report reviews the history of HNS in Argentina, reveals the peculiarities of pediatric HNS, relates norms and legal documents that have been set forth with this end in the country, and shares the author´s experience in the management of HNS schemes as an extension of the caring activity of the hospital he works in.


REFERENCES

  1. Casasola S, Ferraresi Zarranz EM. Soporte nutricional a domicilio: ¿El paradigma último de la provisión de cuidados nutricionales al enfermo? RCAN Rev Cubana Aliment Nutr 2011; 21:303-21.

  2. Strobel CT, Byrne WJ, Ament ME. Home parenteral nutrition in children with Crohn’s disease: An effective management alternative. Gastroenterology 1979;77:272-9.

  3. Howard L, Ament M, Fleming CR, Shike M, Steiger E. Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology 1995;109:355.

  4. Ricour C. Home Total Parenteral Nutrition. Nutrition 1989;5:345-6.

  5. Colomb V. Home parenteral nutrition: The pediatric point of view. Nutrition 1999;15:172-3.

  6. Colomb V, Goulet O, Ricour C. Home enteral and parenteral nutrition in children. Baillières Clin Gastroenterol 1998;12:877-94.

  7. González H, Pernas J, Fernández A; et al. Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria. Publicación RNC sobre Nutrición Clínica 1998;7:45-53.

  8. Faguaga G, Gimelli A, Pérez MJ; et al. Internación domiciliaria en pediatría. Arch Argent Pediatr 2004;102:156.

  9. Galarraga M. Soporte nutricional de alta complejidad: Un modelo de atención integral. Publicación RNC sobre Nutrición Clínica 2008;17:89-91.

  10. Bankhead R, Boullata J, Brantley S, Corkins M, Guenter P, Krenitsky J; et al; for Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations Task Force and the ASPEN Board of Directors. Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33:122-67.

  11. ASPEN American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the Use of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in Adult and Pediatric Patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr January 2002;26(1 Suppl):1S-138S.

  12. Kovacevich DS, Frederick A, Kelly D, Nishikawa R, Young L. Standards for specialized nutrition support: Home care patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20: 579-90.

  13. Staun M, Pironi L, Bozzetti F, Baxter J, Forbes A, Joly F; et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in adult patients. Clinical Nutrition 2009;28:467-79.

  14. Lochs H, Allison SP, Meier R, Pirlich M, Kondrup J, van den Berghe G, Pichard C. Introductory to the ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Terminology, definitions and general topics. Clinical Nutrition 2006;25:180-6.

  15. Grupo NADYA de Nutrición artificial domiciliaria y ambulatoria. Manual de nutrición artificial domiciliaria y ambulatoria. Procedimientos educativos y terapéuticos. SENPE Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral. Madrid: 1996.

  16. Martínez González C, Santana Porbén S. Diseño e implementación de un esquema intrahospitalario de Nutrición enteral. RCAN Rev Cubana Aliment Nutr 2001; 15:130-8.

  17. Ferraresi Zarranz EM. Accesos endovenosos utilizados para la Nutrición Parenteral. RCAN Rev Cubana Aliment Nutr 2009;19:290-309.

  18. Fabeiro M, Dalieri M, Martínez M, Galarraga M, Prozzi M, Barcellandi P; et al. Nutrición Parenteral Domiciliaria (NPD): Factibilidad de implementación desde un hospital público. Nutrición Hospitalaria [España] 2011;26:1435-9.

  19. Hebat A; para el Comité de Normatización de la Asociación Argentina de Nutrición Enteral y Parenteral. Normas de Buena Práctica Clínica de Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria. Actualización 2004. Publicación RNC dedicada a la Nutrición Clínica 2004;13:114-32. Disponible en: http://www.aanep.org.ar/revistas/rnc4_2 004.pdf. Fecha de última visita: 13 de Enero del 2016.

  20. Hebat A; para el Comité de Normatización de la Asociación Argentina de Nutrición Enteral y Parenteral. Normas de Buena Práctica Clínica de Nutrición Parenteral Domiciliaria. Actualización 2004. Publicación RNC dedicada a la Nutrición Clínica 2004;13:133-44. Disponible en: http://www.aanep.org.ar/revistas/rnc4_2 004.pdf. Fecha de última visita: 13 de Enero del 2016.

  21. Visconti G, Perea Luppi F. Actualización de guías sobre nutrición parenteral pediátrica. Publicación RNC dedicada a la Nutrición Clínica 2010;19:15-25. Disponible en: http://www.aanep.org.ar/revistas/rnc1_2 010.pdf. Fecha de última visita: 13 de Enero del 2016.

  22. Grant MJ, Martin S. Delivery of enteral nutrition [Review]. AACN Clin Issues 2000;11:507-16.

  23. Martin L, Cox S. Enteral feeding: Practice guidance. Paediatr Nurs 2000; 12:28-33.

  24. Jones JS, Tidwell B, Travis J, Spencer T, Phillips P, Burford B. Nutritional support of the hospitalized patient: A team approach. J Miss State Med Assoc 1995;36:91-9.

  25. Colomb V, Goulet O, Ricour C. Home enteral and parenteral nutrition in children. Baillière's Clinical Gastroenterol 1998;12:877-94.

  26. Moreno JM, Shaffer J, Staun M, Hebuterne X, Bozzetti F, Pertkiewicz M; et al. Survey on legislation and funding of home artificial nutrition in different European countries. Clin Nutr 2001;20: 117-23.

  27. August D, DeLegge M, Ireton-Jones C, Steiger E. An evidence-based approach to optimal management of vascular and enteral access for home parenteral and enteral nutrition support. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2006;30(1 Suppl): S5-S6.

  28. Holden CE, Puntis JW, Charlton CP, Booth IW. Nasogastric feeding at home: Acceptability and safety. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:148-51.

  29. Gifford H, DeLegge M, Epperson LA. Education methods and techniques for training home parenteral nutrition patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2010;25: 443-50.

  30. Smith CE, Curtas S, Kleinbeck SV, Werkowitch M, Mosier M, Seidner DL, Steiger E. Clinical trial of interactive and videotaped educational interventions reduce infection, reactive depression, and rehospitalizations for sepsis in patients on home parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 2003; 27:137-45.

  31. Saqui O, Chang A, McGonigle S, Purdy B, Fairholm L, Baun M; et al. Telehealth videoconferencing: Improving home parenteral nutrition patient care to rural areas of Ontario, Canada. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 2007;31:234-9.

  32. Durfee SM, Adams SC, Arthur E, Corrigan ML, Hammond K, Kovacevich DS; et al; for the Home and Alternate Site Care Standards Task Force of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. ASPEN Standards for Nutrition Support: Home and Alternate Site Care. Nutr Clin Pract 2014;29: 542-55.

  33. Santana Porbén S. Sistema de control y aseguramiento de la calidad. Su lugar dentro de un programa de intervención alimentaria, nutrimental y metabólica. Nutrición Hospitalaria [España] 2012; 27:894-907.

  34. Santana Porbén S. Sistema de documentación y registros. Su lugar dentro de un Programa de Intervención alimentaria, nutricional y metabólica. Nutrición Hospitalaria [España] 2005; 20: 331-42.

  35. Planas M, Rodríguez T, Lecha M. La importancia de los datos. Nutrición Hospitalaria [España] 2004;19:11-3.

  36. Ralston CW, O'Connor MJ, Ament M, Berquist W, Parmelee AH. Somatic growth and developmental functioning in children receiving prolonged home total parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr 1984; 105:842-6.

  37. Borges VC, da Silva MDLT, Dias MCG, González MC, Waitzberg DL. Longterm nutritional assessment of patients with severe short bowel syndrome managed with home enteral nutrition and oral intake. Nutrición Hospitalaria [España] 2011;26:834-42.

  38. Malone M. Longitudinal assessment of outcome, health status, and changes in lifestyle associated with long-term home parenteral and enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 2002;26:164-8.

  39. Crosby J, Duerksen DR. A retrospective survey of tube-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50:1712-7.

  40. Crosby J, Duerksen DR. A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving longterm home enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2007;31:274-7.

  41. Ferraresi Zarranz EM. Complicaciones infecciosas en la Nutrición parenteral. Revista del ITAES Instituto Técnico para la Acreditación de Establecimientos de Salud [Argentina] 2008;10:20-33.

  42. Ferraresi E, Murguía Torres D. Complicaciones infecciosas de la nutrición parenteral. En: Nutrición enteral y parenteral [Editores: Arenas Márquez H, Anaya Prado R]. McGraw Hill. Ciudad México: 2007. pp 298.

  43. Rudolph CD, Link DT. Feeding disorders in infants and children. Pediatric Clinics North America 2002; 49:97-112.

  44. Mason SJ, Harris G, Blissett J. Tube feeding in infancy: Implications for the development of normal eating and drinking skills. Dysphagia 2005;20: 46-61.

  45. Byars KC, Burklow KA, Fergusson K, O’Flaherty T, Santoro K, Kaul A. A multicomponent behavioral program for oral aversion in children dependent on gastrostomy feedings. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003;37:473-80.

  46. Harding C, Faiman A, Wright J. Evaluation of an intensive desensitisation, oral tolerance therapy and hunger provocation program for children who have had prolonged periods of tube feeds. Int J Evidence‐ Based Healthcare 2010;8:268-76.

  47. Anónimo. Hospital finds nutrition care pays off on all counts, cutting costs, complications, mortality. Clin Resour Manag 2000;1:183-6,177.

  48. Colomb V. Economic aspects of paediatric home parenteral nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2000; 3:237-9.

  49. Green R. More painting with numbers. Med Rec Health Care Inf J 1981;22: 31-6.

  50. Melville CAS, Bisset WM, Long S, Milla PJ. Counting the cost: Hospital versus home central venous catheter survival. J Hosp Infect 1997;35:197-205.

  51. Carnevalli Baxter Y, Dias MCG, Maculevicius J; et al. Economic study in surgical patients of a new model of nutrition therapy integrating hospital and home vs. the conventional hospital model. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 2005;29(Suppl):S96-S105.

  52. O'Connor M, Malone M, Hambleton R. An investigation into information provided for patients on home parenteral nutrition. J Clin Pharm Ther 1988; 13:403-9.

  53. Ireton-Jones C, Lang RK, Gravenstein ME, Schimel S. Home nutrition support from the patient's perspective: The real reality story! Nutr Clin Pract 2006; 21:542-3.

  54. Fain H, Cabrera A, Del Cerro S, Villanova N, Buiras V, Perochena J. Nutrición enteral domiciliaria cíclica en un hospital público. Resúmenes del XIV Congreso Argentino- VI del Cono Surde Soporte Nutricional y Metabolismo. Buenos: 2009. RNC 2009;18(3):90-1. Disponible en: http://www.aanep.org.ar/revistas/rnc3_2 009.pdf. Fecha de última visita: 16 de Enero del 2016.

  55. Nutrición Enteral y Parenteral. Guía para pediatras, neonatólogos y terapistas [Editores: Fernández A, Fain H]. Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría. Asociación Argentina de Nutrición Enteral y Parenteral. FUNDASAP Ediciones. Buenos Aires: 2009.

  56. Guía de Práctica Clínica de Soporte Nutricional Enteral y Parenteral en Pacientes Hospitalizados y Domiciliarios. Asociación Argentina de Nutrición Enteral y Parenteral. Sociedad Argentina de Nutrición. Asociación Argentina de Dietistas y Nutricionistas/Dietistas. Asociación de Nutricionistas Dietistas y Licenciadas Municipales de Buenos Aires. Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Argentina. Disponible en: http://www.aanep.org.ar/downloads/nor mas/resolucion-Guias-AANEP.pdf. Fecha de última visita: 23 de Enero del 2016.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

RCAN. 2016;26