Eguia BO, Morales TB, Guízar MJM, Lemus DR

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 263-268
PDF size: 562.39 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Very often, there is insufficient bone volume available in the edentulous site of a patient to allow dental implant placement. One way to prepare such patients for an implant placement is to use an autologous bone block (ABB) graft. Objective: To determine the success and failure rates of ABB grafts and their associated factors. Material and methods: A review was made of all the ABB graft surgeries performed at the Department of Oral Surgery of De La Salle Bajío University’s Faculty of Dentistry during the period 2010-2015. The graft was considered a success if, during the subsequent surgical procedure to place the implant, osseointegration was confirmed and there was a sufficient increase in bone volume to allow the placement of an implant of the selected diameter. Results: Thirty-five cases of ABB grafts were reviewed, 25 (71.4%) of which were successful and 10 (28.6%) of which failed. Most of the failures involved grafts performed at posterior sites and patients who were smokers. Conclusions: ABB grafts are an alternative treatment option that can help to improve the bone volume in atrophic sites. However, the results obtained are unpredictable, especially in smokers.

REFERENCES

1. Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualties. J Am Dent Assoc. 1969; 78 (4): 767-776.

2. Brånemark PI, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Breine U, Jeppson PH, Ohman A. Reconstruction of the defective mandible. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 9 (2): 116-128.

3. Buser DA. Localized ridge augmentation using GBR, I. Surgical procedures in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993; 13 (1): 29-45.

4. Ferrigno N, Laureti M. Surgical advantages with ITI TE implants placement in conjunction with split crest technique. 18-month results of an ongoing prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 (2): 147-155.

5. Chiapasco M, Consolo U, Bianchi A, Ronchi P. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a multicenter prospective study on humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19 (3): 399-407.

6. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P, Rimondini L. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: A 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15 (1): 82-95.

7. Cordaro L, Amadé D, Cordaro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13 (1): 103-111.

8. Smith JD, Abramsson M. Membranous versus endochondral bone autografts. Arch Laryngol. 1974; 99 (3): 203-205.

9. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983; 72 (6): 778-784.

10. Borstlap WA, Heidbuchel KL, Freihofer HP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Early secondary bone grafting of alveolar cleft defects. A comparison between chin and rib grafts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1990; 18 (5): 201-205.

11. Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kleinman A, Rohrer MD. The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17 (2): 238-248.

12. Olate S, Kluppel LE, Chaves-Netto HDM, Stabile GAV, Mazzonetto R, Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Sitios donantes mandibulares en implantología - Una evaluación clínica. Int J Odontostomat. 2007; 1 (2): 121-127.

13. Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, Nisii A, Barausse C, Esposito M. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7 (2): 153-171.

14. Rocchietta I, Simion M, Hoffmann M, Trisciuoglio D, Benigni M, Dahlin C. Vertical bone augmentation with an autogenous block or particles in combination with guided bone regeneration: a clinical and histological preliminary study in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18 (1): 19-29.

15. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 (4): 432-440.

16. Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L, Sigal L. Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation. Implant Dent. 2005; 14 (2): 131-138.

17. Schwartz-Arad D, Samet N, Samet N et al. Smoking and complications of endosseous dental implants. J Periodontol. 2002; 73 (2): 153-157.

18. Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kleinman A, Rohrer MD. The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17 (2): 238-248.

19. Ortega-Lopes R, Andrade VC, Nóia CF, Cidade-Castelo PV, Netto HDM, Mazzonetto R. Retrospective four year analysis in 199 bone grafts of the alveolar ridge. RGO: Rev Gaucha Odontol. 2012; 60 (1): 79-83.

20. Proussaefs P. Clinical and histologic evaluation of the use of mandibular tori as donor site for mandibular block autografts: report of three cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26 (1): 43-51.

21. Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for extensive reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges. J Periodontol. 2005; 76 (4): 636-641.

22. Tolman D. Reconstructive procedures with endosseous implants in grafted bone: a review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10 (3): 275-294.

23. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12 (6): 767-776.