medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 4

<< Back

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (4)

Substitution of retained canines with first maxillary premolars. Case report

Hernández P, Vázquez LA, Ortiz VM, Ortiz VG, Terán AA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 271-277
PDF size: 1182.51 Kb.


Key words:

Retained teeth, first maxillary premolars.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Retained teeth are defined as non-erupted, well-formed, teeth that remain inside the jawbone. Third molars as well as upper canines are the most frequently retained teeth, athough lower second premolars and supernumerary teeth are also prone to suffer retention. Objectives: To replace retained canines with first maxillary premolars by using the labial cuspid of the first maxillary premolars as canine guidance and class I molar relationship coupled to a suitable anterior guidance. Case report: A 16 year-old male patient with bilateral molar class III, primary maxillary canines and upper and lower anterior crowding: the radiographs show two supernumerary teeth between the lateral incisors and the first upper premolars and the impaction of the permanent maxillary canines over the upper central incisors roots, with resorption of a third of the upper right central incisor root and of the apical third of the lateral incisor in the same side, as well as the central and lateral in the opposite side. Conclusions: The replacement of the canines by premolars, excluding the orthodontic surgery, is a viable treatment with good functional, periodontal and esthetic results, as long as there is a good orthodontic management of the final position of the anterior teeth. Nevertheless, it’s not a choiceforall cases.


REFERENCES

  1. Aguana K, Cohen L, Padrón L. Etiopatogenia y terapéutica de caninos permanentes ectópicos e incluidos. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría Ortodoncia. (2010, Junio). Disponible en: http://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2010/art15.asp

  2. Pérez FMA, Pérez FP, Fierro MC. Alteraciones en la erupción de caninos permanentes. Int J Morphol. 2009; 27 (1): 139-143.

  3. Simms RA. Management of orthodontic treatment when first premolars are substituted for canines. Angle Orthod. 1997; 47 (4): 239-248.

  4. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, Loozen G, Willems G. Root resorption of the maxillary lateral incisor caused by impacted canine: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13: 247-255.

  5. Canut JA, Plasencia E, Barrachina C, Asensi C. Ortodoncia clínica. Edit. Salvat/Melo. Barcelona-México. 1998. pp. 59-61.

  6. Lai CS, Suter VG, Katsaros C, Bornstein M. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 36 (4): 450-456.

  7. Aguana K, Cohen L, Padrón L. (2011, Junio). Diagnóstico de caninos retenidos y su importancia en el tratamiento ortodóncico. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatria. Ortodoncia.ws. Recuperada 16/05/13. Disponible en: http://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2011/art11.asp

  8. Alves N, De Oliveira Nascimento CM, Olave E. Aspectos clínicos y morfológicos de los dientes supernumerarios. Int J Morphol. 2011; 29 (3): 1040-1046.

  9. Mirabella D, Giunta G, Lombardo L. Substitution of impacted canines by maxillary first premolars: a valid alternative to traditional orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143 (1): 125-133.

  10. Nieri M, Crescini A, Rotundo R, Baccetti T, Cortellini P, Pini Prato GP. Factors affecting the clinical approach to impacted maxillary canines: a bayesian network analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137 (6): 755-762.

  11. Ericson S, Kurol PJ. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70 (6): 415-423.

  12. Manne R, Gandikota S, Juvadi SR, Medapati R, Anche S. Impacted canines; Etiology, diagnosis and orthodontic management. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012; 4 (Suppl 2): S234-S238.

  13. Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101: 159-171.

  14. Bishara SE. Clinical management of impacted maxillary canines. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4 (2): 87-88.

  15. Bjerklin K, Guitirokh CH. Maxillary incisor root resorption induced by ectopic canines. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81 (5): 800-806.

  16. Becker A, Chaushu G, Chaushu S. Analysis of failure in the treatment of impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthodontic Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137 (6): 743-754.

  17. Alonso A, Albertini J, Bechelli. Oclusión y diagnóstico en rehabilitación oral. Editorial Médica/Panamericana. 2003; pp. 26-29.

  18. Tuesta O, Williams F, Adriazola M, Tomona N. Tratamiento de caninos impactados mediante exposición quirúrgica y tracción ortodóncica: reporte de un caso. Rev Estomatol Hered. 1997; 7-8 (1-2): 26-29.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2016;4