medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2016; 29 (3)

Validation of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the screening of visual disorders in children

Álvarez RMB, Mokey CMO, Izquierdo IME, Álvarez VG, Rodríguez CA, Romero DA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 398-409
PDF size: 122.59 Kb.


Key words:

clinical practice guideline, visual screening, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, kappa agreement coefficient.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to validate the examination procedures established by the Clinical Practice Guideline suggested for the screening of visual disorders at pediatric ages in the primary health care.
Methods: a descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study of a sample of 633 patients aged 3-5 years was conducted at Marfan teaching pediatric hospital from February 2014 to January 2015. Two primary health care pediatricians and a psychologist performed the screening set by the clinical practice guideline; one ophthalmologist supervised and controlled the application of screening in line with the set protocol whereas the other, aided by an optometrist, made the selected tests as truth criteria. The study of the predictive capacity of the exam procedures in the suggested clinical practice guideline was based on four variables, i.e. visual acuity, stereopsis, eye alignment and fundus reflex examination. Data processing used Statistic software and Epidat 4.
Results: the overall values for sensitivity was 88.15 %, specificity 9.21 %, positive and negative predictable values reached 79.07 % and 98.57 %, respectively. The agreement force was very good, with K= 0.813.
Conclusions: the results confirm that the suggested Clinical Practice Guideline should be recommended as a valid tool to detect visual disorders at pediatric ages under the present conditions of the Cuban society.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Ceguera y discapacidad visual. Datos y cifras. Nota descriptiva No. 282; 2014 [citado 9 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/es/

  2. Carlton J, Kaltenthaler E. Amblyopia and quality of life: a systematic review. Londres: Eye. 2011;25:403-13.

  3. García Aguado J, Esparza Olcina MJ, Galbe Sánchez-Ventura J, Martínez Rubio A, Mengual Gile JM, et al. Cribado de alteraciones visuales en la infancia. Rev Pediatr Aten Prim. 2014;16:173-94.

  4. American Academy of Ophthalmology/Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. Pediatric Eye Evaluations. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2012 [citado 16 de octubre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://one.aao.org/preferredpractice- pattern/pediatric-eye-evaluations-ppp--september-

  5. American Academy of Ophthalmology/Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines. Amblyopia. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2012 [citado 16 de octubre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.aao.org/ppp

  6. Grupo PrevInfad/PAPPS Infancia y Adolescencia. Cribado de los trastornos visuales. Guía de actividades preventivas por grupos de edad; 2014 [citado 9 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.aepap.org/previnfad/actividades.htm

  7. Esparza Olcina MJ. Cribado de alteraciones visuales en niños de uno a cinco años: Revisión sistemática para actualizar la recomendación de 2004 de la US Preventive Services Task Force. Evid Pediatr. 2013;9:57.

  8. Álvarez Rivero MB. Recomendaciones Oftalmología. En: Colectivo de autores. Libro Consulta de Puericultura. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2014. p. 22-3.

  9. Donis JH, Evaluación de la validez y confiabilidad de una prueba diagnóstica. AvanBiomed. 2012;1:73-81.

  10. Wilson JMG, Junger G. The principles and practice of screening for disease. Public Health Papers: WHO No. 34; 1968 [citado 24 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37650

  11. Miller JM, Lessin HR, American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology, American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Instrumentbased pediatric vision screening policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):983-6.

  12. Delgado Domínguez JJ. Detección de trastornos visuales. Recomendación. En: Recomendaciones PrevInfad/PAPPS; 2007 [citado 24 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.aepap.org/previn-fad/rec_vision.htm

  13. Adler P, Scally AJ, Barrett BT. Test-retest variability of randot stereoacuity measures gathered in an unselected sample of UK primary school children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:656-61.

  14. Williams C, Harrad RA, Harvey I, Sparrow JM, ALSPAC Study Team. Screening for amblyopia in preschool children: Results of a population-based, randomised controlled trial. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001;8:279-95.

  15. Laria C. Screening en ambliopía y estrabismos. Act estrabol. 2012 [citado 9 de diciembre de 2015];41(1):4. Disponible en: http://www.oftalmologia.eloculista.es/index.php?/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Oftal. 2016;29