medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2016; 38 (2)

Initial experience in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a general hospital in Mexico City

Crisanto-Campos BA, Arce-Liévano E, Robles-Aviña JA, Cárdenas-Lailson LE, Trejo-Ávila ME, Moreno-Portillo M
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/69210

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/69210
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/69210

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 59-66
PDF size: 254.83 Kb.


Key words:

Pancreatic tumors, laparoscopic pancreaticoduo­denectomy.

ABSTRACT

Background: Nowadays, open pancreaticoduodenectomy is the gold standard in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. Gagner and Pomp described in 1994 the laparoscopic approach of pancreaticoduodenectomy; there are numerous papers in the worldwide literature describing acceptable outcomes with the laparoscopic approach. Aims: To describe the outcomes of patients with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the last two years at the host hospital. Material and methods: Patients with pancreatic tumors treated from March 2013 to March 2015 with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. Outcomes were determined and compared with those published in the worldwide literature. Results: Seven patients were included (five with total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and two with hybrid approach). The mortality rate was 0%; morbidity, 14.2%; mean operating time, 625 minutes; mean blood loss was 678 ml; the mean hospital stay was 12.5 days. Conclusions: The outcomes obtained in this study demonstrate that, in selected patients and with skilled surgeons, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe and efficient option to treat patients with resectable pancreatic tumors.


REFERENCES

  1. Liang S, Hameed U, Javaraman S. Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 14246-14254.

  2. Gagner M, Palermo M. Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009; 16: 726-730.

  3. Schnelldorfer T, Reyd-Lombardo K, Sarr M. Development of pancreatoduodenectomy in North America. Surg Today. 2011; 41: 377-381.

  4. Anderson B, Karmali S. Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: dream or reality? World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 14255-14262.

  5. Chan C, Franssen B, Uscanga L, Robles G, Campuzano M. Pancreaticoduodenectomía: resultados en un centro de alto volumen. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2006; 71: 252-256.

  6. Crisanto B, Torres M, Vázquez I, Dávila M, Arce E, Cárdenas L, et al. Quiste de colédoco en adultos: resección totalmente laparoscópica. Reporte de caso. Cirugía Endoscópica. 2013; 14: 38-42.

  7. Crisanto B, Arce E, Cárdenas L, Romero L, Rojano M, Gallardo M, et al. Manejo laparoscópico de los seudoquistes pancreáticos: experiencia de un hospital general de la Ciudad de México. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2015; 80: 198-204.

  8. Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994; 8: 408-410.

  9. Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2015; 1: 9-23.

  10. Hakeem A, Verbeke C, Cairns A, Aldouri A, Smith A, Menon K. A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014; 13: 435-441.

  11. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 215: 810-819.

  12. Jarufe N, Fernández J, Boza C, Navarrete F, Escalona A, Funke R, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomía totalmente laparoscópica: técnica quirúrgica y experiencia inicial. Rev Chilena de Cirugía. 2009; 61: 33-38.

  13. Flores F, Guadalupe R, García L, Pilatuña E. Experiencia en las primera duodenopancreatectomías o cirugía de Whipple realizadas totalmente por laparoscopía. Rev Oncol. 2010; 20: 51-55.

  14. Mazza O, Claria R, Bersano F, Yazde L, Santibañes E, Pekolj J. Duodenopancreatectomía totalmente laparoscópica. Consideraciones técnicas y aplicabilidad inicial en un centro de alto volumen de cirugía pancreática. Rev Argent Cirug. 2012; 102: 62-68.

  15. Senthilnathan P, Gurumurthy SS, Gul SI, Sabnis S, Natesan AV, Palanivelu C, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer —experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015; 25: 295-300.

  16. Kim S, Song K, Jung Y, Kim Y, Park d, Lee S, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 95-103.

  17. Croome K, Farnell M, Que F, Reid-Lombardo K, Truty M, Nagorney D, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncological advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 633-640.

  18. Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel H, Sulimanoff I, Fisher S, Viñuela E, Kingham P, et al. Minimally-invasive vs. open pancreatoduodenectomy: sistematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 129-149.

  19. Tran TB, Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, Poultsides GA, Norton JA, Visser BC. The first decade of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: costs and outcomes using the nationwide inpatient sample. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 1778-1783.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2016;38