medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSan

ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 12

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2016; 20 (12)

Validity of the estimate equations for the fat free mass through the method of the bioelectric impedance in any population

Bergues CI, Morales GM, Bergues CLE, Verdecia JM, Martínez TJP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 6055-6062
PDF size: 655.33 Kb.


Key words:

electric resistance, estimate equations, fat free mass, analyzers of electric bioimpedance.

ABSTRACT

A study with the purpose of comparing 3 equations --selected at ramdom from the literature on the topic-- for the estimation of fat free mass was carried out, and these, in turn, with that estimated when using the clinical approach. For this, the not corrected and corrected values of the corporal electric resistance were taken into account, and mean differences were used as statistical approaches (distribution of the Student´s t test) and the Bland Altman method. The results showed that these estimate equations for fat free mass can be used in the clinical evaluation (in apparently healthy persons and in sick individuals) if a correction factor is introduced to each of them.


REFERENCES

  1. Lara Lafargue A, Bergues Cabrales LE, Verdecia Jarque M, Laurencio Martínez Y, Ortega Díaz Y. Parámetros bioeléctricos in vitro e in vivo, estimados con los analizadores Bodystat® 1500-MDD y BioScan® 98. MEDISAN. 2013 [citado 24 Jun 2016]; 17(9): 4054-63. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/san/vol17_9_13/san01179.htm

  2. Morales González M, Verdecia Jarque M, Rubio González T, Bergues Cabrales LE, Lara Lafargue A, Martínez Tassé JP. Influencia de la resistencia eléctrica en la estimación del agua corporal total y la masa libre de grasa. MEDISAN. 2013 [citado 24 Jun 2016]; 17(10): 7001-10. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/san/vol17_10_13/san121710.htm

  3. Harikumar R, Prabu R, Raghavan S. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and its medical applications: a review. Int J Soft Comp Eng. 2013; 3(4): 193-8.

  4. Wolf GK, Gómez-Laberge C, Kheir JN, Zurakowski D, Walsh BK, Adler A, et al. Reversal of dependent lung collapse predicts response to lung recruitment in children with early acute lung injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012; 13(5): 509-15.

  5. Lucas EG. Use of an electrical impedance tomography method to detect and track fractures in a gelatin medium [tesis]. Michigan: Michigan Technology University; 2014 [citado 24 Jun 2016]. Disponible en: http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1742&context=etds

  6. Oh TI, Jeong WC, McEwan A, Park HM, Kim HJ, Kwon OI, et al. Feasibility of magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) conductivity imaging to evaluate brain abscess lesion: in vivo canine model. J Mag Reson Imaging. 2013; 38(1): 189-97.

  7. Grimnes S, Martinsen OG. Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. 2 ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2008.

  8. Nescolarde L, Núñez A, Bogónez-Franco P, Lara A, Vaillant G, Morales R, et al. Reference values of the bioimpedance vector components in a Caribbean population. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2013; 8(4): 141-4.

  9. Tong IO, Hyung JK, Woo CJ, Hun W, Oh IK, Eung JW. Conductivity image enhancement in MREIT using adaptively weighted spatial averaging filter. BioMed Eng OnLine. 2014 [citado 24 Jun 2016]; 13: 87. Disponible en: https://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-13-87




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

MediSan. 2016;20