medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2016, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2016; 73 (6)

Facial biotype and hyoid bone position in patients commencing orthodontic treatment

Castrillo FA, Alonzo EML, Pérez TLB, Colomé RGE, Alayola CCH, Medina PS

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 297-302
PDF size: 345.45 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the vertical and anteroposterior position of the hyoid bones in patients between the ages of 12 and 20 years with different facial growth patterns upon their commencing orthodontic treatment at the Autonomous University of Yucatán’s Department of Orthodontics. Material and methods. Our sample consisted of 17 lateral cephalometric radiographs traced manually, with the hyoid triangle being measured to determine the vertical position of the hyoid bone (as per the cephalometric analysis of Rocabado). The position of the anteroposterior hyoid bones was determined using Ricketts’s PTV reference plane (linear measurements were taken as described by Ricketts). For the purposes of comparison between different skeletal patterns, the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV=SD/m) were used as a measure of relative variability. Bootstrap Confidence Intervals (BCI) of 95% were used for the mean and for determining the range of possible values for the location of the hyoid. Results: In 58.82% of the sample, the position of the hyoids was found to be lower. In brachyfacial subjects, the hyoids were found to be positioned further forward, as was the case with most of the mesofacial subjects (66.66%). Conclusion: The relative position of the hyoid bones in specific facial biotypes plays an important role during orthodontic treatment, given that it could help in the positioning of the tongue.


REFERENCES

  1. Graber LW. Hyoid changes following orthopedic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1978; 48 (1): 33-38.

  2. Henríquez J, Fuentes R, Sandoval P, Muñoz A. Análisis de la estabilidad ortostática cráneocervical en adultos jóvenes mapuches. Int J Morphol. 2003; 21 (2): 149-153.

  3. Henríquez J, Sandoval P, Fuentes R. Anatomía radiológica del hueso hioides. Int J Morphol. 2000;18 (1): 117-124.

  4. Alarcón A. Deglución atípica: revisión de la literatura. Acta Odontológica Venezolana [Internet]. 2013; 51 (1). Disponible en: http://www.actaodontologica.com/ediciones/2013/1/art21.asp.

  5. Amatoury J, Kairaitis K, Wheatley JR, Bilston LE, Amis TC. Peripharyngeal tissue deformation, stress distributions, and hyoid bone movement in response to mandibular advancement. J Appl Physiol. 2015; 118 (3): 282-291.

  6. Tarkar JS, Parashar S, Gupta G, Bhardwaj P, Maurya RK, Singh A et al. An evaluation of upper and lower pharyngeal airway width, tongue posture and hyoid bone position in subjects with different growth patterns. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10 (1): ZC79-ZC83.

  7. Ulusoy C, Canigur Bavbek N, Tuncer BB, Tuncer C, Turkoz C et al. Evaluation of airway dimensions and changes in hyoid bone position following class II functional therapy with activator. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72 (8): 917-925.

  8. German RZ, Campbell-Malone R, Crompton AW, Ding P, Holman S, Konow N et al. The concept of hyoid posture. Dysphagia. 2011; 26 (2): 97-98.

  9. Coelho-Ferraz MJP, Nouer DF, Bérzin F, Sousa MA, Romano F. Cephalometric appraisal of the hyoid triangle in Brazilian people of Piracicaba’s region. Braz J Oral Sci. 2006; 5 (17): 1001-1006.

  10. Feng X, Cartwright MS, Walker FO, Bargoil JH, Hu Y, Butler SG. Ultrasonographic evaluation of geniohyoid muscle and hyoid bone during swallowing in young adults. Laryngoscope. 2015; 125 (8): 1886-1891.

  11. Bavbek NC, Tuncer BB, Turkoz C, Ulusoy C, Tuncer C. Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20 (7): 1747-1755.

  12. Muto T, Yamasaki A, Takeda S. A cephalometric evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with mandibular retrognathia and prognathia, and normal subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37 (3): 228-231.

  13. Zhang J, Chen G, Li W, Xu T, Gao X. Upper airway changes after orthodontic extraction treatment in adults: a preliminary study using cone beam computed tomography. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (11): e0143233.

  14. Jiang YY. Correlation between hyoid bone position and airway dimensions in Chinese adolescents by cone beam computed tomography analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45 (7): 914-921.

  15. Pae EK, Quas C, Quas J, Garrett N. Can facial type be used to predict changes in hyoid bone position with age? A perspective based on longitudinal data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134 (6): 792-797.

  16. Pae EK, Ferguson KA. Cephalometric characteristics of non- obese patients with severe OSA. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69 (5): 408-412.

  17. Jung SK, Kim TW. The relevance analysis of hyoid bone position to skeletal or dental openbite and dentofacial characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 120 (4): 528-533.

  18. Fernández-Sánchez J, Silva-Filho O. Atlas de cefalometría y análisis facial. Madrid: Editorial Médica Ripano; 2009.

  19. Restrepo GA. Ortodoncia. Teoría y clínica. Medellín: Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas; 2004.

  20. Zamora CE, Duarte S. Atlas de cefalometría. Análisis clínico y práctico. Caracas: Amolca; 2003.

  21. Rocabado M. Análisis biomecánico cráneo cervical a través de una telerradiografía lateral. Rev Chil Ortod. 1984; 1 (1): 42-52.

  22. Lobiondo PE. Diagnóstico en ortodoncia: estudio multidisciplinario. Barcelona: Quintessence; 1998.

  23. Chihara LM, Hesterberg TC. Mathematical statistics with resampling and R. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

  24. STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI versión 16.2.04. StatPoint Technologies, Inc.; 2013. Disponible en: www.statgraphics.com

  25. Jena, AK, Duggal R. Hyoid bone position in subjects with different vertical jaw dysplasias. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81 (1): 81-85.

  26. Valenzuela SP. Posición antero posterior del hueso hioides en los biotipos faciales [Tesis]. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Facultad de Odontología; 2008. Disponible en: http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/cybertesis/2223

  27. Patel D, Ash S, Evans J. The role of orthodontics and oral and maxillofacial surgery in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea-a single case report. Br Dent J. 2004; 196 (5): 264-267.

  28. Hori K, Taniguchi H, Hayashi H, Magara J, Minagi Y, Li Q et al. Role of tongue pressure production in oropharyngeal swallow biomechanics. Physiol Rep. 2013; 1 (6): e00167.

  29. Chauhan A, Autar R, Pradhan KL, Yadav V. Comparison of pharyngeal airway dimension, tongue and hyoid bone position based on ANB angle. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 6 (1): 42-51.

  30. Friedlander AH, Friedlander IK, Pogrel MA. Medical matters: dentistry’s role in the diagnosis and co-management of patients with sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. Br Dent J. 2000; 189 (2): 76-80.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com