medigraphic.com
ISSN 1729-519X (Print)

2016, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 2016; 15 (5)

Efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy. Clinical trial

Seijas COR, Olazábal GE, Morera PM, Pérez TF, Montes de Oca ME, García-Menocal HJL

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 688-701
PDF size: 148.68 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for the study of colon’s disease and in certain pathologies a therapeutic option. Colon insufflation normally performed using ambient air which led this technique to be painful. Insufflation with carbon dioxide (CO2) causes less abdominal pain.
Objective: To evaluate, the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy.
Material and Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (Phase IIb) was performed. Universe: all patients with indication of colonoscopies that met the selection criteria and assist to the Minimal Access Surgery National Centre in Havana in the period from October to December 2014. The sample consisted of a total of 100 patients over 18 years of which 50 were subject to the air insufflation technique and 50 with CO2 insufflation.
Results: Abdominal pain after colonoscopy was significantly lower in the group that received the CO2 insufflation. Hypoxemia and propofol doses used were similar in both groups. CO2 average pressure values were higher in the case of the CO2 group during the procedure but within the normal range; without clinical complications.
Conclusions: The use of CO2 in colonoscopy causes significantly less pain in the first hour. Its use in patients with deep sedation is safe and the technique is not altered and doesn’t have a time reduction.


REFERENCES

  1. Lieberman D. Progress and Challenges in Colorrectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2115-26.

  2. Valori, J-F. Rey, W. S. Atkin, M. Bretthauer, Senore C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.Endoscopy. 2012;44(S03):SE88–SE105.

  3. Raju G, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R. Endoscopic management of colonoscopic perforations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74,6 : 1380–1388 4.

  4. Sanabria E, Seoane A, Araújo I, García A, Márquez L, et al. Incidencia de complicaciones de la colonoscopía en un programa de cribado poblacional de cáncer colorrectal: estudio prospectivo multicéntrico. Endoscopy. 2013; 45- A 64. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1354669 5.

  5. Boley SJ, Agrawal GP, Warren AR, Veith FJ, Levowitz BS, Treiber W, et al. Pathophysiologic effects of bowel distension on intestinal blood flow. Am J Surg. 1969;117:228-34.

  6. Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest.Endosc 1984;30:68-70.

  7. Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J, Norman G, Goodacre RL.Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gas-trointest Endosc 1992;38:564-7.

  8. Sumanac K, Zeally I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK,et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO2 insuf-flation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial eva-luating a new commercially available CO2 delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:190-4.

  9. Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Gisselsson L, Grot-mol T, Skovlund E, et al. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer pre-vention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air inssuflation in colonoscopy. Gut. 2002;50:604-7.

  10. Church J, Delaney C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:322-6.

  11. Díez P, Gil P, Alcaide N, AtienzaR, Barrio J, de la Serna C, Pérez-Miranda M. Comparación entre la insuflación con aire ambiente o con dióxido de carbono durante la colonoscopía en pacientes sedados conpropofol. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104: 411-417.

  12. Kiriyama S, Naito H, Fukuchi M, Yuasa K, Horiuchi K, Kuwano H, Saito Y. Improvement of Abdominal Distention and Pain After Colonoscopy Without Sedation Using Carbon Dioxide Insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75, 4: AB282–AB283.

  13. Wong JC, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong DC, Chung CC, Li MK. Towards painless colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial on carbon dioxide-insufflating colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78: 871-4.

  14. Rogers BH. Carbon dioxide for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1980;78: 1659-60.

  15. Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B, Rieder E, Karner-Hanusch J, Dirlea D, et al. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien KlinWochenschr. 2009;121: 464-8.

  16. Yamano H, Yoshikawa K, Kimura T, Yamamoto E, Harada E, Kudou T, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gasvolume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partialCO2 pressure. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45: 1235-40.

  17. Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q, Wei JF, Chen XF, Zhou DK, et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment.Pharmacol.Ther 2012;35 (10):1145-54.

  18. Vázquez-Sequeiros E.Insuflación con dióxido de carbono en endoscoía: ¿lujo o necesidad? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012; 104 (8):395-398.

  19. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1153-7

  20. Sajid MS, Caswell J, Bhatti MI, Sains P, Baig MK, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and metaanalysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Disease. 17(2), pp. 111– 123.

  21. Suzuki T, Minami H, Kotmasu T, Masusda R, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto A, et al. Prolonged carbon dioxide insufflation under general anesthesia for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:1021-9.

  22. Uraoka T, Kato J, Kuriyama M, Hori K, Ishikawa S, Harada K, et al. CO2 insufflation for potencially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopist. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(Supl 41):5186-2.

  23. Ko CW, Riffle S, Shapiro JA, Saunders MD, Lee DS,Tung BY,et al.Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screen in gors urveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:648-56.

  24. Jonas DE, RussellLB, Sandler RS, Chou J, Pignone M.Patients time requirements for screen in gcolonoscopy. Am J Gastroentero l2007;102:2401-10.

  25. Rogers BH.The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonosco- pic electro surgical polipectomy.Gastrointest Endosc.1974;20:115-7.

  26. Geyer, U. Guller, Ch. Beglinger, "Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Colonoscopy Is Safe: A Prospective Trial of 347 Patients," Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, vol. 2012, Article ID 692532, 4 pages, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/692532.

  27. Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GIendoscopy: a systematic review.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:843-9.

  28. Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosopy 2012; 44(02): 128-136.

  29. Seebach L, Bauerfeind P,Gubler C."Sparing thesurgeon":Clinical experience with over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal perforation. Endoscopy. 2010;42:1108-11.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com