medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2016; 17 (4)

Experience with non-absorbable invaginating suture reinforcement of the staple line in laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery

Márquez-González SM, Cerón-Rodríguez F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 175-178
PDF size: 180.04 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic gastric sleeve, gastric leak, stapling line reinforcement, invaginating suture.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In spite of technological advances in stapling materials, the laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy remains associated to serious complications such as the complex situation of a gastric leak. Stapling line reinforcement has been a method proposed to prevent this eventuality. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to assess the results and experience of stapling line reinforcement with invaginating suture in that patient that underwent a laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery. Material and methods: A retrospective study from May 2014 to August 2016 of 108 patients with a standardized laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Results: Surgical time with an average of 78.23 minutes (58-140) and invaginanting suture time of 11.90 minutes (9-17). Post op complications were; bleeding in 3 patients (1 spleen and 2 trocar sites) from wich 2 required re-operation. Leakage was not a complication found in this group. Discussion: The present study favors the invaginating suture as a reinforcing method, in terms of leakage, bleeding, and low cost. Conclusion: Invaginating suture for stapling line reinforcement regardless of requiring additional time, it allows the surgeon to increase his experience and improve his technique skills. This paper sets the precedent for future larger and comparative studies.


REFERENCES

  1. Abou Rached A, Basile M, El Masri H. Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: review of its prevention and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 13904-13910.

  2. Rogula T, Khorgami Z, Bazan M, Mamolea C, Acquafresca P, El-Shazly O et al. Comparison of reinforcement techniques using suture on staple-line in sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015; 25: 2219-2224.

  3. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26: 1509-1515.

  4. Carandina S, Tabbara M, Bossi M, Valenti A, Polliand C, Genser L et al. Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: absorbable monofilament, barbed suture, fibrin glue, or nothing? Results of a prospective randomized study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 20: 361-366.

  5. Kwiatkowski A, Janik MR, Pasnik K, Stanowski E. The effect of oversewing the staple line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: randomized control trial. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016; 11: 149-155.

  6. Barreto TW, Kemmeter PR, Paletta MP, Davis AT. A comparison of a single center’s experience with three staple line reinforcement techniques in 1,502 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients. Obes Surg. 2015; 25: 418-422.

  7. Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (slr) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015; 25: 1133-1141.

  8. Navarro A. Anatomía quirúrgica del estómago y duodeno. Cirugía Digestiva. 2009; II-200: 1-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2016;17