medigraphic.com
Colegio de Medicos y Cirujanos República de Costa Rica

2016, Number 621

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Cos Cen 2016; 73 (621)

Descripción de pacientes con artrogriposis congénita en un centro de fisioterapia pediátrica en el norte de México

Rojo ODJ, Torres FJ

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 751-756
PDF size: 378.28 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: congenital arthrogryposis defined as congenital limitation of movement, nonprogressive of two or more joints in different areas of the body. It is considered the result of a fetal motility decrease in early stages of pregnancy, which causes a regression in the development of muscle with consequent limitation of movement. Aim: to describe the types of congenital arthrogryposis patients of a pediatric rehabilitation center (Centro de Rehabilitación e Inclusión Infantil Teletón [CRIT] in State of Durango), in the Northern Mexico. Methods: it is a descriptive study; records were reviewed of 17 patients diagnosed with congenital arthrogryposis, making graphs. Results: were found 8 patients with amyoplasia, 4 were found with distal arthrogryposis type 1, cases of patients with distal arthrogryposis type 2B, 3, 4, 8 and 9 with a case in each type was also found. Conclusions: amyoplasia is the most common type of arthrogryposis in CRITDurango (47%).


REFERENCES

  1. Bamshad M, Bohnsack JF, Jorde LB, Carey JC. Distal arthrogryposis type 1: clinical analysis of a large kindred. Am J Med Genet. 1996 Nov 11; 65(4): 282-5.

  2. Bamshad M, Jorde LB, Carey JC. A revised and extended classification of the distal arthrogryposes. Am J Med Genet. 1996 Nov 11; 65(4): 277-81.

  3. Bamshad M, Van Heest AE, Pleasure D. Arthrogryposis: a review and update. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul; 91 Suppl 4: 40-6.

  4. Bevan WP, Hall JG, Bamshad M, Staheli LT, Jaffe KM, Song K. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (amyoplasia): an orthopaedic perspective. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jul-Aug; 27(5): 594-600.

  5. Botha SJ, Bütow KW. Gordon syndrome: literature review and a report of two cases. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 Jan; 52(1): e18-22.

  6. Dudkiewicz I, Achiron R, Ganel A. Prenatal diagnosis of distal arthrogryposis type 1.Skeletal Radiol. 1999 Apr; 28(4): 233-5.

  7. Hall JG, Aldinger KA, Tanaka KI. Amyoplasia revisited. Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Mar; 164A(3): 700- 30.

  8. Hall JG. Oligohydramnios sequence revisited in relationship to arthrogryposis, with distinctive skin changes. Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Nov; 164A(11): 2775-92.

  9. Kalampokas E, Kalampokas T, Sofoudis C, Deligeoroglou E, Botsis D. Diagnosing arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 2012: 264918.

  10. Kowalczyk B, Felús J. Arthrogryposis: an update on clinical aspects, etiology, and treatment strategies. Arch Med Sci. 2016 Feb 1; 12(1): 10-24.

  11. Martinez AE, Palafox VHE, Manzano SC. Hallazgos radiológicos más frecuentes en los pacientes con diagnóstico de artrogriposis en el Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. Anal Radiol Mex 2007; 6 (1): 37-42.

  12. Nowlan NC. Biomechanics of foetal movement. Eur Cell Mater. 2015 Jan 2;29: 1-21.

  13. Pagnan NA, Gollop TR. Distal arthrogryposis type II D in three generations of a Brazilian family. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Mar; 26(3): 613-9.

  14. Skalsky AJ, McDonald CM. Prevention and management of limb contractures in neuromuscular diseases. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2012 Aug; 23(3): 675-87.

  15. Toydemir RM, Bamshad MJ. Sheldon-Hall syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009 Mar 23; 4:11.

  16. Valdés-Flores M, Casas-Avila L, Hernández-Zamora E, Kofman S, Hidalgo-Bravo A. Characterization of a group unrelated patients with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016 Jan-Feb; 92(1): 58-64.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com