medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Odontológica Mexicana Órgano Oficial de la Facultad de Odontología UNAM

ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2017; 21 (1)

Dental cingulum (cingulate)

Moreno S, Moreno F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 6-7
PDF size: 181.23 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

Dental cingulate represents a morphological characteristic scarcely studied in the dental field, but widely researched in biological and anthropological contexts. This morphologic structure, unknown or misunderstood by many dentists, represents the point of origin of different morphological dental traits. Traditionally, dental cingulate has been defined as the portion of enamel forming a convex protuberance in the cervical third of the palatal and lingual surfaces of anatomic crowns of upper and lower incisor and canine teeth. Thus, in the dental context, it has been considered as an exclusive morphological structure of incisor and canine teeth –as class– of human dentition.


REFERENCES

  1. Berkovitz BKB, Holland GR, Moxham BJ. Oral anatomy, histology and embryology. 2nd edition. London: Mosby International; 2002.

  2. Reynolds SH. The vertebrate skeleton. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1897.

  3. Kermack DM, Kermack KA, Mussett F. The Welsh pantothere Kuehneotherium praecursoris. Zool J Linn Soc. 1968; 47: 407-423.

  4. Hillson S. Teeth. Manuals in archaeology. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

  5. Osborn HF. The evolution of mammalian molars to and from the tritubercular type. The American Naturalist. 1888; 22 (264): 1067-1079.

  6. Kraus BS. Morphologic relationships between enamel and dentine surfaces of lower first molar teeth. J Dent Res. 1952; 31: 248-256.

  7. Butler PM. Some functional aspects of molar evolution. Evolution. 1972; 26 (3): 474-483.

  8. Duque JF, Ortíz M, Salazar L, Mejía C. Mamíferos: evolución y nomenclatura dental. Rev Estomat. 2009; 17 (2): 30-44.

  9. Scott GC, Turner II CG. The anthropology of modern human teeth: dental morphology and its variation in recent human populations. London: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

  10. Rodríguez JV. Dientes y diversidad humana: avances de la antropología dental. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2003.

  11. Hernández J, Villavicencio J, Arce E, Moreno F. Talón cuspídeo: reporte de cinco casos. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2010; 21 (2): 208-217.

  12. Nabeel S, Danish G, Hegde U, Mull P. Parastyle: clinical significance and management of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2012; 3 (3): 61-64.

  13. Rodríguez C, Moreno F. Paramolar tubercle in the left maxillary second premolar: a case report. Dental Anthropol. 2006; 19: 65-69.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Odont Mex. 2017;21