medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología

Órgano Oficial del Sistema Mexicano de Investigación en Psicología (SMIP)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Invest Psic 2013; 5 (2)

The challenge to build a systemic diagnosis

Ceberio, MR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 155-161
PDF size: 120.53 Kb.


Key words:

Anti-psychiatric, deinstitutionalization, relational network, diagnostics, systemic therapy.

ABSTRACT

The issue of diagnosis was and is a difficult subject to interpret. Among practitioners of clinical psychology and psychiatry there are varying opinions ranging in staunch defense on the diagnosis and subsequent medication to extreme positions that do not consider the diagnosis as a variable within the treatment. These positions show ideologies, theoretical models, therapeutic pragmatism, and policy positions, as well as the history of psychiatry with its own anti-psychiatric and deinstitutionalization movements which have incarnate the deepest critics. In the field of systemic therapy, also positions have been diverse but convergent in the sense that it is difficult to build a diagnostic label regardless of the complex network of interactions that take place in the systems. In this sense, the traditional diagnosis would only be “the tip of the iceberg”, dissecting the bowels that the complex systems entail. Linares (2013) has devoted many years doing research in this controversial area, with excellent developments that combine labels, relational network and diagnostics.


REFERENCES

  1. Bateson, G., Weakland, J., Haley, J., & Fry, W. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251-264.

  2. Brown, S. (1973). Laws of the form. Nueva York: Bantam Books.

  3. Ceberio, M. R. (2010). La nave de los locos. Buenos Aires: Teseo.

  4. Ceberio, M. R. (2013). Cenicientas y patitos feos. De la desvalorización personal a la buena autoestima. México: Herder.

  5. Ceberio, M. R. & Linares, J. L. (2000). Locura, marginación y libertad. Buenos Aires: ECUA. Ceberio, M. R. & Watzlawick, P. (1998). La construcción del universo. Barcelona: Herder.

  6. Basaglia, F. (1968). L’istituzione negata. Turín: Einaudi.

  7. Coletti, M. & Linares, J. L. (comp.) (1997). La intervención sistémica en los servicios sociales ante la familia multiproblemática. La experiencia de Ciutat Vella. Barcelona: Paidós.

  8. Cooper, D. (1985). Psiquiatría y antipsiquiatría. Barcelona: Paidós.

  9. Keeney, B. (1983). Estética del cambio. Barcelona: Paidós.

  10. Laing, R. (1980). El yo dividido. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  11. Lidz, T. (2013). La persona. México: Herder.

  12. Linares, J. L. (1996). Identidad y narrativa. La terapia familiar en la práctica clínica. Barcelona: Paidós.

  13. Linares, J. L. & Campo, C. (2000). Tras la honorable fachada. Los trastornos depresivos desde una perspectiva relacional. Barcelona: Paidós.

  14. Linares, J. L. & Soriano, J. A. (2013). Pasos para una psicopatología relacional. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 5(2), 119-146.

  15. Morin, E. (1984). Ciencia con consciencia. Barcelona: Anthropos.

  16. Whitehead, A. N. & Russell, B. (1981). Principia mathematica. Madrid: Paraninfo. (Versión en castellano de Principia mathematica, 1910, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  17. Watzlawick, P., Beaving, J., & Jackson, D. (1981). Teoría de la comunicación humana. Barcelona: Herder.

  18. Wynne, L., Ryckoff, L., Day, J., & Hirsch, S. I. (1958). Pseudomutuality in the family relations of schizophrenics. Psychiatry, 21, 205-220.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Invest Psic. 2013;5