medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Odontológica Mexicana Órgano Oficial de la Facultad de Odontología UNAM

ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2017; 21 (2)

Inter-examiner concordance in the assessment of periodontal findings by means of panoramic X-rays

Díaz CA, Hernández AY, Montalvo AS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 98-102
PDF size: 220.69 Kb.


Key words:

Chronic periodontitis, panoramic X-ray, inter-examiner variability, diagnosis, periodontics, (MeSH).

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the degree of inter-examiner concordance in the interpretation of periodontal findings in panoramic X-rays in last year students of the School of Dentistry at the University of Colombia. Material and methods: A descriptive inter-observer concordance-consistency study was conducted for interpretation of periodontal findings in panoramic X-rays among last year students of the School of Dentistry of the University of Colombia and compared results to thos obtained by a periodontics specialist. Concordance evaluation was achieved by means of a kappa coefficient using SPSS Statistics 2.0 program. Results: 80 last year students (undergraduate seniors) were evaluated each one assessed two panoramic X-rays, for a total of 160 observations. General concordance established a minimum kappa value of 0.011, and maximum value of 0.720. Conclusions: Concordance among observing students and the gold standard was poor. This indicated that students did not apply acquired knowledge during their undergraduate dental studies, and provided thus a misleading impression on the circumstances of the periodontium.


REFERENCES

  1. Corbet EF, Ho DK, Lai SM. Radiographs in periodontal disease diagnosis and management. Aust Dent J. 2009; 54 Suppl 1: S27-4S3.

  2. Rushton VE, Horner K. The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. J Dent. 1996; 24 (3): 185-201.

  3. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Screening panoramic radiology of adults in general dental practice: radiological findings. Br Dent J. 2001; 190 (9): 495-501.

  4. Simancas-Pallares M, Arévalo-Tovar L, Díaz-Caballero A. Concordancia interexaminador de hallazgos periodontales utilizando radiografía periapical convencional. Rev Univ Ind Santander Salud. 2016; 48 (1): 45-50.

  5. Hirschmann PN. Radiographic interpretation of chronic periodontitis. Int Dent J. 1987; 37 (1): 3-9.

  6. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent. 2000; 28 (4): 219-226.

  7. Martínez M. Anatomía normal en la radiografía panorámica. Rev Ateneo Argent Odontológica. 2008; 47 (3): 18.

  8. Aguilar O, Gallego-Gómez CL, Iriarte-Agudelo AM, Quintero IS. Prevalencia de hallazgos en radiografías panorámicas de rutina. Rev Nal Odo UCC. 2009; 5 (9): 15-20.

  9. Martínez M, Martínez B, Bruno I. Radiografía panorámica en la práctica dental: alcances y limitaciones. RAAO. 2008; 47 (2): 18-21.

  10. Akesson L, Håkansson J, Rohlin M. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19 (5): 326-332.

  11. Díaz-Caballero AJ, González-Martínez FD, Arévalo-Tovar LL. Concordancia entre nivel de inserción clínico y examen radiográfico para diagnóstico de periodontitis crónica. Avances en Periodoncia. 2012; 24 (2): 95-102.

  12. Ashwinirani SR, Suragimath G, Jaishankar HP, Kulkarni P, Bijjaragi SC, Sangle VA. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of conventional intraoral periapical and direct digital radiographs in detecting interdental bone loss. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9 (2): ZC35-ZC38.

  13. Lanning SK, Best AM, Temple HJ, Richards PS, Carey A, McCauley LK. Accuracy and consistency of radiographic interpretation among clinical instructors using two viewing systems. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70 (2): 149-159.

  14. Lewis EA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Tedesco LA. Reliability and validity of clinical assessments of malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81 (6): 473-477.

  15. Marbach JJ, Raphael KG, Janal MN, Hirschkorn-Roth R. Reliability of clinician judgements of bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30 (2): 113-118.

  16. Cerda J, Villarroel L. Evaluación de la concordancia inter-observador en investigación pediátrica: Coeficiente de Kappa. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2008; 79 (1): 54-58.

  17. Armitage GC. The complete periodontal examination. Periodontol 2000. 2004; 34: 22-33.

  18. Montero-Aguilar M, Zeledón-Mayorga R, Ramírez-Mora T, Monestel-Umaña S. Variabilidad interexaminador del diagnóstico de periodontitis apical crónica en radiografías panorámicas. Odovtos Int J Dent Sc. 2015; 54 (3): 54-58.

  19. Gedik R, Marakoglu I, Demirer S. Assessment of alveolar bone levels from bitewing, periapical and panoramic radiographs in periodontitis patients. West Indian Med J. 2008; 57 (4): 410-413.

  20. Tewary S, Luzzo J, Hartwell G. Endodontic radiography: who is reading the digital radiograph? J Endod. 2011; 37 (7): 919-921.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Odont Mex. 2017;21