medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
ISSN 0484-7903 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2017; 40 (S1)

Neuroaxial approach options. Evidence and importance of the use of the USG in the neuroaxis

Rebollo-Manrique RE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 247-249
PDF size: 147.64 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Longnecker D, Brown D, Newman M, Zapol W. Section D. Regional. Chapter 46. Neuraxial anesthesia. In: Anesthesiology. Ed. McGraw-Hill; 2010.

  2. Miller R, Cohen N, Eriksson L, Fleisher L. IV Anesthesia Management. 51. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. Miller anesthesia. 8a ed. Ed. Elsevier; 2016.

  3. Butterworth J, Mackey D, Wasnick J. Section IV: Regional anesthesia and pain management. 45 Spinal, epidural, & caudal blocks. In: Clinical anesthesiology. 5a ed. Ed. MacGraw Hill; 2013.

  4. Neal JM, Brull R, Horn JL, Liu SS, McCartney CJ, Perlas A, et al. The Second American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine Assessment of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Executive Summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:181-194.

  5. Harrison DA, Langham BT. Spinal anaesthesia for urologic surgery. A survey of failure rate, postdural puncture headache and patient satisfaction. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:902-903.

  6. Horlocker TT, McGregor DG, Matsushige DK, Schroeder DR, Besse JA. A retrospective review of 4767 consecutive spinal anesthetics: central nervous system complications. Perioperative outcomes group.
Anesth Analg. 1997;84:578-584.

  7. Wulf H. Epidural anaesthesia and spinal hematoma. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43:1260-1271.

  8. Perlas A, Chaparro LE, Chin KJ. Lumbar neuraxial ultrasound for spinal and epidural anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:251-260.

  9. Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:277-280.

  10. Watson MJ, Evans S, Thorp JM. Could ultrasonography be used by an anaesthetist to identify a specified lumbar interspace before spinal anaesthesia? Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:509-511.

  11. Halpern SH, Banerjee A, Stocche R, Glanc P. The use of ultrasound for lumbar spinous process identification: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:817-822.

  12. Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Beyene J, et al. Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f1720.

  13. Kallidaikurichi-Srinivasan K, Iohom G, Loughnane F, Lee PJ. Conventional landmark-guided midline versus preprocedure ultrasound-guided paramedian techniques in spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1089-1096.

  14. Lim YC, Choo CY, Tan KT. A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42:191-198.

  15. Taylor JA. Lumbosacral subarachnoid tap. J Urol. 1940;43:561-564.

  16. Lee PJ, Tang R, Sawka A, Krebs C, Vaghadia H. Brief report: real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia using Taylor’s approach. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1236-1238.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2017;40