medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Oftalmología

Anales de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oftalmología y Archivos de la Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Oftalmol 2005; 79 (6)

Intraocular pressure behavior after Lasik.

Rojas-Diaz J, Baca-Lozada O, Velasco-Ramos R, Viggiano AD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 318-321
PDF size: 34.49 Kb.


Key words:

Intraocular pressure, Lasik.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Establish the intraocular pressure (IOP) behavior after laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik); learn if a relationship between the amount of corneal ablation and IOP after Lasik exist and determine if flap’s thickness has any effect in IOP after Lasik. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, observational and descriptive study, between March and November 2002. We studied 91 eyes from 46 patients. Preoperatory IOP and pachymetry were measured in all patients, and were treated with Lasik conventional technique. Postoperatory IOP and pachymetry were measured in all patients. Patients were divided in three groups according to corneal ablation: 1) ‹50 microns; 2) 51-75 microns and 3) ›76 microns. According to the flap thickness we divided two groups: a) 180 microns and b) 160 microns. Statistical analysis was done by Paired Student’s t test. Results: In all groups we found a decreased IOP (P‹0.05). When we compared all groups we did not found a statistically significant reduction in IOP after Lasik. Conclusion: IOP underestimation after Lasik does exist, which does not depend on the amount of corneal ablation. The flap’s thickness does not have an effect in the IOP underestimation.


REFERENCES

  1. 1. Boyd BF y col. Lasik presente y futuro. Highlights Of Ophthalmology, 2001, cap. 1, pag. 1-3.

  2. 2. Hornova J, Sedlak P, Hlouskova B. Refractive procedures – LASIK and intraocular pressure in myopic eyes, Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2000; 56(2):98-103.

  3. 3. Hart WM Jr. Adler Fisiología del Ojo. España, Mosby/Doyma Libros, 1994. 250-269.

  4. 4. Wallace LMA y cols. Glaucoma. Los Requisitos en Oftalmologia. Mosby, 2000. pag. 19 – 20.

  5. 5. Filipecka I, Gierek-Ciaciura S. Influence of cornea thickness changes after refractive surgery on intraocular pressure measurements. Klin Oczna 2001; 103(1):25-7.

  6. 6. Pan Y, Zhang Y, Lian J. Analysis of intraocular pressure and corneal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Chung Hua Yen Ko Tsa Chih 1999; 35(5):359-62.

  7. 7. Levy Y, Zadok D, Glovinsky Y, Krakowski D, Nemet P. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25(4):486-91.

  8. 8. Agudelo LM, Molina CA, Alvarez DL. Changes in intraocular pressure after lasik in situ keratomileusis for miopía, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2002; 18(4):472-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2005;79