medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2017; 59 (3)

Methodological design of the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016

Romero-Martínez M, Shamah-Levy T, Cuevas-Nasu L, Méndez Gómez-Humarán I, Gaona-Pineda EB, Gómez-Acosta LM, Rivera-Dommarco JÁ, Hernández-Ávila M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 299-305
PDF size: 256.88 Kb.


Key words:

population surveys, health status, nutritional status, obesity, overweight, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective. Describe the design methodology of the halfway health and nutrition national survey (Ensanut-MC) 2016. Materials and methods. The Ensanut-MC is a national probabilistic survey whose objective population are the inhabitants of private households in Mexico. The sample size was determined to make inferences on the urban and rural areas in four regions. Describes main design elements: target population, topics of study, sampling procedure, measurement procedure and logistics organization. Results. A final sample of 9 479 completed household interviews, and a sample of 16 591 individual interviews. The response rate for households was 77.9%, and the response rate for individuals was 91.9%. Conclusions. The Ensanut-MC probabilistic design allows valid statistical inferences about interest parameters for Mexico´s public health and nutrition, specifically on overweight, obesity and diabetes mellitus. Updated information also supports the monitoring, updating and formulation of new policies and priority programs.


REFERENCES

  1. Brewer K. Three controversies in the history of survey sampling. Survey Methodology 2013;39(2):249-262.

  2. Sepúlveda J, Tapia-Conyer R, Velásquez O, Valdespino JL, Olaiz-Fernández G, Kuri P, Sarti E, Conde-González C. Diseño y metodología de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. Salud Publica Mex 2007;49(3):427-432. https:// doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342007000900015

  3. Palma O, Shamah T, Franco A, Olaiz G, Mendez I. Metodología. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2006. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2006.

  4. Romero-Martínez M, Shamah-Levy T, Franco-Nuñez A, Villalpando S, Cuevas-Nasu L, Gutiérrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012: diseño y cobertura. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55(suppl 2):S332-S340. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v55s2.5132

  5. Hernández-Ávila M, Gutiérrez JP, Reynoso-Noverón N. Diabetes mellitus en México. El estado de la epidemia. Salud Publica Mex 2013;55(supl 2):S129-S136. http://dx.doi.org/10.21144/spm.v55s2.5103

  6. Thompson S. Sampling. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2002.

  7. Cochran W. Técnicas de muestreo. México: CECSA, 1985.

  8. Gutiérrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2012.

  9. Coneval. Los mapas de pobreza en México. Anexo técnico metodológico [documento en internet]. México: Coneval, 2007 [consultado el 6 de marzo de 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.coneval.gob.mx/cmsconeval/ rw/resource/coneval/med_pobreza/1024.pdf

  10. Inegi. Encuesta Intercensal 2015 [documento en internet]. México: Inegi, 2015 [consultado el 27 de marzo de 2017]. Disponible en: http://www. beta.inegi.org.mx/proyectos/enchogares/especiales/intercensal/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2017;59