medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2017; 74 (4)

Bacterial comparison of 30 handpieces of high speed before and after being used in the Faculty of Dentistry Region Veracruz

Romero MBR, Mendez PNC, Martínez NMP, Trejo PZB, Villeda MK, Tadeo XZC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 5
Page: 185-188
PDF size: 305.31 Kb.


Key words:

Air-driven handpieces, high-speed, disinfection, bacteria, systemic diseases, contamination.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Dental activity is exposed to a lot of microorganisms, and clinical interventions have a direct or indirect contact with them. Whether through the instruments, dental equipment contaminated with saliva, blood, etc; so you should take into account the type of contamination of handpieces for being the most widely used equipment for dental treatment. General Objectives: Determine the bacterial load in high-speed parts before and after being used in different clinical uses in Dentistry School at UV, Veracruz. Methodology: Cross-sectional, descriptive and observational research. Material and methods: 30 pieces of students from the Universidad Veracruzana School of Dentistry, Veracruz region, which a sample was taken with a swab to pieces before and after use in dental practice were randomly selected. Cultures with samples obtained observed during three days in a row microscope to determine the presence of bacterial colonies were made. Results: Of the 30 pieces before being used 24% of Bacillus Gram-positive samples were found; 20% Bacillus Gram-negative, Gram-positive Streptobacillus 6%; 20% Gram-positive Staphylococcus, 3% developed Coccobacillus Gram-negative and 22% Gram negative Actinomyces. The remaining 2% no colony forming units development (UFC). In a second sampling; 33% developed Bacillus Gram-positive, Gram-negative Bacillus 10%, 20% obtained Sthapylococcus Gram-positive, Gram-negative Sthapylococcus 3% and 34% did not develop colony forming unit (CFU). Conclusion: In the first sampling 98% of the pieces were microorganism growth, while in the second 66% and the presence of microorganisms obtained 34% no development.


REFERENCES

  1. Lewis DL, Boe RK. Cross-infection risks associated with current procedures for using high - speed dental handpieces. J Clin Microbiol.1992; 30 (2): 401-406.

  2. Liébana J. Microbiología oral. Editorial Interamericana McGraw-Hill. España. 1995; p. 42.

  3. Malagon G, Malagon O. Urgencias odontológicas. 3ra ed. Editorial medica Panamericana. Colombia. 2003; p. 84.

  4. Gooch B, Marianos D, Ciesielski C, Dumbaugh R, Lasch A, Jaffe H et al. Lack of evidence for patient to patient. Transmission of HIV in a dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993; 124 (1): 38-44.

  5. Palomo AB. Riesgo de Contaminación cruzada para el paciente que asiste a las clínicas de la facultad de odontología de la Universidad Francisco Marroquin. [Tesis] Facultad de Odontología: Universidad Francisco Marroquín. Guatemala. 2001.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2017;74